Don't worry, I think the school would concern who could follow up and who could not follow up this pattern for P.1.
I really great happy to know the school have this plan for p.1 and I ask why it could not apply for existing p.2,3... but I have no choice. They said it is regarding for the school resources and could not studenly to change for all studient. So, I think the school has the serious consideration for the change and it must have the follow up action with the parents.
Don't worry, I think the school would concern who could follow up and who could not follow up this pattern for P.1.
I really great happy to know the school have this plan for p.1 and I ask ...
Hi everymami,
I also ask same question as the topic of why dont start on P.2 as may schools. The teacher answer me that P.1 is for testing only and review the result. And the mainly problem is they are not enough supporting for P.2 due to the parent will be compare the chinese result of P.1. So, they decide to try it in P.1 first due to they havnt any record before. Anyway, it is good for the changing of the school for us. And hope they will be review after the 1st term.
我都希望學校在來年會實施P.2 以上全級 "以普教中".
I trust that mandarian is more important than English
for the future. Nowadays, students must to learn
this subject in USA.
As per the information fm the Principle that the student for P.2 or over (this year) that means our sons that will not "以普教中". It is cfmd by the Principle on the talk on 30/10/2007 morning. (家校嫻談). It will only start fm P.1 student for this years.
:cry:
原文章由 Terry280905 於 07-11-13 09:35 硐表
早晨, 各位媽咪,
我都希望學校在來年會實施P.2 以上全級 "以普教中".
I trust that mandarian is more important than English
for the future. Nowadays, students must to learn
this subject in USA. ...
As per the information fm the Principle that the student for P.2 or over (this year) that means our sons that will not "以普教中". It is cfmd by the Principle on the talk on 30/10/2007 mor ...
How about the school year of YR08/09 ?
(when our son in P.3)
Any more new from Principal on 30/10/2007.
Could you tell us more?