- 在線時間
- 83 小時
- 最後登錄
- 08-8-11
- 國民生產力
- 10
- 附加生產力
- 0
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 03-8-13
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 64
- 主題
- 1
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 76
- UID
- 13093

|
Thanks KenBaBa for your useful sharing.
Thanks deniset for your valuable, detailed and comprehensive information. I'd clarify a few points. Concerning competition against sharing, I absolutely agree with you that friendly competition is constructive most of time. What my wife heard is unfriendly competition, a sort of competition without sharing, which is obstructive to learning and personality development (while competition with sharing is constructive).
Award winning is not crucial. It's indication of students' and/or teachers' standard, after some adjustment based on other relevant information gathered. It's particular useful when there are no formal common standard for comparison or when other relevant information is not reliable/available. Fame is not my major concern. I do agree fundamental grounding works are most crucial for a new school.
to be fair to every school, in particular the unfamous ones, I've to consider factors as most comprehensive as I can. The questions I asked are areas I don't have sufficient information to judge, not implying that they're my crucial considerations.
After all, though Logos may be weak in some aspects, I do understand every school has strengths and weaknesses. Although I haven't made up my mind whether to enter this school, I still believe that Logos is an excellent school. Logos' strengths are very impressive to me. In particular, one of the strengths I value is that Logos has comitted and constructive parents like deniset & KenBaBa. I fully support this school.
Thanks again to deniset & KenBaBa.
Best regards
t421316
原文章由 deniset 於 07-7-27 19:24 發表 
Dear t421316,
Thank you for your effort in drafting up the long list of queries. This shows that you do have a keen interest in Logos. Below is some limited info I can share with you, though I'd ... |
|