直資學校用納稅人的錢攪世襲教育,大家點睇?

fotk

Just wondering :

1) the kids of these government officials, are they sending their kids to these system? do that trust the system they created?

原帖由 edwinho123 於 10-11-3 17:57 發表
政府呢個小一制度...真係令到好多小朋友的父母以及家庭成員i.e.uncle, auntie...好擔心、好煩....簡直茶飯不思.....做咩都冇晒心機......因為日日等結果.....

yuengooluk

可是即使我們繼續在這裡討論也不能改變現狀. 我們可以向政府表達意見嗎? 有遊行我一定去. 唉,自己太懶,永遠只跟人走......

原帖由 motherotk 於 10-11-3 05:50 發表
These controversal discussions are good, that's why we will not be "brainwashed" without independent thinking!!

I like this discussion.. The are good noises, why not?

That's what we are teaching ou ...

thomasha

Maybe the culture of "blow water" is popular...:)

ANChan59

原帖由 fotk 於 10-11-4 08:33 發表
Just wondering :
1) the kids of these government officials, are they sending their kids to these system? do that trust the system they created?

I hope my answer won't upset you.

If they have overseas educational allowance, definitely send their kids to UK for boarding school and back to HK through non-JUPAS. Get the best of the staff benefits, but remember, we, "Blow water" parents pay for that. Maximise benefit > not trust our eduation system.

If they have local educational allowance, they can send their kids to ESF or international school. They may not trust the current system or they have more finance support to have better and more choices.

If they have so many choices and financial supports, why bother the system? That's only our business.

4eyesDad

Why can Government officials get away with it?

motherotk

Reviewing of realties to the educational section through this sharing will be good..

I hope there are some people from the educational development sections is on this discussion forum...

原帖由 4eyesDad 於 10-11-5 18:09 發表
Why can Government officials get away with it?

Lumpapa

i agree !  it is not fair to the kid who do not have relationship.

ANChan59

原帖由 4eyesDad 於 10-11-5 18:09 發表
Why can Government officials get away with it?

King Arther and Touch-bottom rice were so self-centered. They thought they knew everything in education, so DSS, Medium of Instruction, 334.... Eventually, one is the dictator and the other one only have a master degree in education.

Michael Suen is even worse, "I am a civil servant.... time for retirement..... Don't bother me......."

Sumyeema1

原帖由 ANChan59 於 10-11-15 23:59 發表

Michael Suen is even worse, "I am a civil servant.... time for retirement..... Don't bother me......."

haha, i got the same feeling, his best skill is 帶人游花園 + 等長俸

judy

King Arther and Touch-bottom rice were so self-centered. They thought they knew everything in education, so DSS, Medium of Instruction, 334.... Eventually, one is the dictator and the other one only have a master degree in education.

呢啲完全唔關飯焦和角章事。

Medium of Instruction,97前己有共識。教育改革，阿蟲担大旗。

以前，教育局還未成局，只是執行處而己。所有政策，都是政府委托教委會研究，研究結果再交政府，然後教育署執行。

ANChan59

原帖由 judy 於 10-11-16 11:10 發表
呢啲完全唔關飯焦和角章事。

Medium of Instruction,97前己有共識。教育改革，阿蟲担大旗。

以前，教育局還未成局，只是執行處而己。所有政策，都是政府委托教委會研究，研究結果再交政府，然後教育署執行。 ...

Judy

It's too boring of the discussion, add some sense of humour.

Be exact, you are partially right. DSS and MOI should not blame on them, others still hold.

goo_littlebb

算啦, 好多人根本唔係理性去分析, 如果係純抽, 根本就唔駛咁多名牌幼稚園, 根本連幼稚園都唔需要添, 因根本唔係跟小朋友能力去考!!!
考得直資呢類就要跟個遊戲規則, 又要玩又唔服, 自己會好痛苦!

原帖由 DaddyX 於 10-11-16 19:39 發表
其實有部份人話全部學校轉做只純抽
有無人想會好大問題?

請冷靜分析
如果係真係work EDB 一早做左啦
佢地仲做少D呀

到時會點,全香港有成470+咁多間小學
咁即是中位數係派你的第235志願
咁會點
到時你區內心水名校 ...

星歷仔ccsclh

原帖由 ANChan59 於 10-11-4 23:10 發表


I hope my answer won't upset you.

If they have overseas educational allowance, definitely send their kids to UK for boarding school and back to HK through non-JUPAS. Get the best of the staff benef ...

I hope my answer won't upset you.
If they have overseas educational allowance, definitely send their kids to UK for boarding school and back to HK through non-JUPAS. Get the best of the staff benef ... [/quote]

我認爲這標題只反映真實的一小面
自行官津小兒不能去喇叭世襲
要父母及小孩在劇烈競爭下，一打17至18才能有九間真資offer.
如給我官津世襲，我一家人在這幾個月會非常輕鬆及開心