- 在線時間
- 0 小時
- 最後登錄
- 06-10-17
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 0
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 05-12-9
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 76
- 主題
- 11
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 76
- UID
- 66873

|
Re: 家長送孩子讀兩幼園 朝9晚6谷兩文 街上換校服 專家斥虐兒
Yes, I agree with you that most of the children are not suitable to go to two kinders and there are very few gifted children. But, my point is that there must be some cases that the children are very happy to go to two hinders and still have enough sleep (e.g. from 9:15-8:15) Children have different sleeping pattern. Some don't need to nap in the afternoon. Anyway, I think we should be more open and accept the fact that not every child is the same. chan803 寫道:
你都識講啦 "gifted children", 有幾多個係呀? 連一個 proper 的午餐都無得食而你都係要話 ok, 咁咪當 ok law. 我一早已經話過 "囝囡係人地的, 佢地覺得咁樣好 D, 又無犯法, 咪由佢地 law"
3/4 歲 人仔, 幾多個可以話唔鍾意父母咁樣做, 而父母又真係聽佢地話呀?
仲有呀, 現代醫學對d唔駛訓/唔停得的小朋友有個學名, 叫做"過度活躍症"+ [不過唔代表我認同呢個講法]
講多句, 要 "谷兩文", 都唔一定要返兩所唔同的 kinder, 出面有人可以 1 對 1/ 1 對 幾 咁 教小朋友英語.
[quote]
qmaqmama 寫道:
"虐兒"? I think it's because you and the expert assumed that the child must change at the street and must feel very tried after going to school. The case I know is that the child would not sleep even after going to two schools. There are some gifted children. So, I said it all depends on the style and habit of the child. If you make so many negative assumptions and labellings, you and the expert must be correct in saying "虐兒", but are the assumption the fact? I think every case is different. I would say don't push the child if he/she does not like. One man's meat is another man's poison.
[/quote] |
|