英華 VS 喇沙

亞水

我係ls家長，咁明未？

by the way, 亞Vkwan，我好似響網度同你傾過兩句....

原文章由 VKwan 於 07-12-6 20:17 發表

唔明？

VKwan

係？唔記得，邊度？

原文章由 亞水 於 07-12-6 20:23 發表
我係ls家長，咁明未？

by the way, 亞Vkwan，我好似響網度同你傾過兩句....

matthewdad

I don't understand why the people like to compare a tier 1 school (75 years) with a tier 2 new school. How do you know the changes of your son after 5-10 years ?
active -> non active  or
non -active ->  active
In term of acedemic result, which one is better ? In term of sport, whcih one is better ? In term of music, which one is better ?

LS can turn "all student which is allocated by government' into top student.  YW .. let see the result several years later.

poorpapa

原文章由 matthewdad 於 07-12-6 23:21 發表
LS can turn "all student which is allocated by government' into top student.  YW .. let see the result several years later.

I'll choose LS if I'm lucky enough to choose from LS & YW.

However, I can't agree with your "turn all students...into top students".

So happened that I have several friends graduated from LS (one of them couldn't get into LS Secondary) who really are not top student, no matter in terms of academic results, sports or music.  Their career is as poor as mine (or even worse).

Be realistic.  LS has many top students, but many "study with top students".  All depends on the "chemical reaction" among the kid, parent & school, no matter the kid is in which school.

[ 本文章最後由 poorpapa 於 07-12-6 23:58 編輯 ]

亞水

with all the respect due, should that argument runs, we all do not have to make selection coz there is no significant diffrence between schools.

sure enough, we don't have the crystal ball to tell us how the kids would be in some  5 or 10 years time. it's a matter of expectation. you have all the reasons to expect more from a well established school to a brand-new one, in every perspectives.

sounds like soccer betting, i would certain place my bets on mu than on sunderland for the premier league champion

原文章由 matthewdad 於 07-12-6 23:21 發表
I don't understand why the people like to compare a tier 1 school (75 years) with a tier 2 new school. How do you know the changes of your son after 5-10 years ?
active -> non active  or
non -active - ...

亞水

好似係講關於net41抽獎的........係咪話你有個親戚搬竇去博搞珠，但係我話比你聽ls得幾十個位拿出來搞咁上下......

原文章由 VKwan 於 07-12-6 20:47 發表
係？唔記得，邊度？

林嗅四

喂
使唔使介紹個醫生比你呀..
你係咪有病呀
講野咁討厭既

原文章由 sally.cc 於 07-12-7 04:10 發表


投票區咩！緊係有趣味啦！非常有趣添 唔係好明？英華仟幾人報考有幾巴閉？間間直資大多數都過仟人報考啦！（小朋友自己贏返來？）贏乜吖 ？自圓其說！ ...

VKwan

Oh, yes！
咁勁，咁都記得。
個成功率太低啦，後尾佢有直資收，所以唔再等LS。
由於時差問題，比著我都唔夠膽博，一陣博唔到又冇得吃回頭草…

原文章由 亞水 於 07-12-7 00:25 發表
好似係講關於net41抽獎的........係咪話你有個親戚搬竇去博搞珠，但係我話比你聽ls得幾十個位拿出來搞咁上下......

5183

喂!是不是你自己個仔考唔到英華,所以你心理有問題,到處發神經,中建大厦有位心理醫生唔錯,不防一看.

鳳梨

十成十啦

原文章由 5183 於 07-12-7 10:52 發表
喂!是不是你自己個仔考唔到英華,所以你心理有問題,到處發神經,中建大厦有位心理醫生唔錯,不防一看.

gracechung

Hmm....我諗，雖然英華唔係咩超級名校，即使未到一線頂都有一定水準，所以競爭都唔細。
同埋，我個人認為(未必係客觀)，可能裡面的學生家庭的社會階層較傾向中產，相對少了一些去深水灣俱樂部開生日會的富豪家庭，可以預料到小朋友在學校讀書就讀書，少了其他比較。這都會是吸引有心栽培小朋友的中產父母報讀。始終香港中產家庭為數很多。
僧多粥少，競爭當然大啦。

原文章由 5183 於 07-12-7 10:52 發表
喂!是不是你自己個仔考唔到英華,所以你心理有問題,到處發神經,中建大厦有位心理醫生唔錯,不防一看.

亞水

Vkwan,

唔出奇丫，個個都驚死，你個親戚揀直資而唔去博，係好正常既反應，比我都會。 (死佬，咁你捉個仔去博喇沙？)路係人行出來既，所以有人既地方就有路...... 棵草肯等你回頭咪得law

亦都因為咁，我唔多覺亞 sally.c.c既講法錯左係邊？邊個做校長同讀書有無趣味有咩關系？唔通校長自已寫課程自已教？真係願聞其詳喎.....拿！！我無質疑過校長既能力呀，唔好話我針對邊個邊個，我唔明咋.....

個個都驚死，又真係無邊間直資無一千幾百人考播......雖然來來去去都係果班人 (經驗之談，亞水仔去考果陣咪個個熟口熟面)，學生有要求，唔通學校就無？有D學生A校得就B校reject,有d就B校得A校reject, 邊有贏輸好講？人揀你，你揀人，下馬？

你咪自已計下law,有幾多間直資，間間千幾人考，對照全部適齡入學人數，有無咁多applicant呀？全香港d細路都去考直資呀？

講野討厭係咪指個表達方式？包裝唔好就代表錯，代表無point?

原文章由 VKwan 於 07-12-7 10:39 發表
Oh, yes！
咁勁，咁都記得。
個成功率太低啦，後尾佢有直資收，所以唔再等LS。
由於時差問題，比著我都唔夠膽博，一陣博唔到又冇得吃回頭草…

[ 本文章最後由 亞水 於 07-12-7 12:47 編輯 ]

SandyWu

原文章由 5183 於 07-12-7 10:52 發表
喂!是不是你自己個仔考唔到英華,所以你心理有問題,到處發神經,中建大厦有位心理醫生唔錯,不防一看.

我係好多topic都見過佢既comment........

VKwan

亞水，
機會率咁細，點博？呢間直資真係會額滿架喎。就係你地唔稀罕既.........YW！
紙上談兵，講果個就梗係輕鬆，但我眼見真係有咁的事時，真係半句都唔敢答嘴。

我話YW唔夠好咩，LS更好咩，但條件上YW已經比好多學校有優勢。LS都只不過得150幸運兒，咁其他人唔通唔洗讀書咩？又唔通唔係果150幸運兒資質會比果150差？

呢d問題，真係包青天都諗唔掂。

hugoBaBa

actually, to development the children require
Formula = School + student character + Parents.
In same school, different child have different development/result. For parents, we need to consider the school is suitable or not for your child. Maximum benefits to the child is the main issue.

If child is smart and like to challange, he should apply higher grade and competitive school.
If child is smart but not like challange, he should apply another type.

So, there is no best school for all but best school for your particular child character.

I like YW much because it is more middle level and encourage student to learn rather than encourage student to compete

liverpoolfan

原文章由 iwff 於 07-12-6 17:01 發表
我朋友個女讀協恩幼稚園時係林浣心做校長的,佢都話林校長很有魅力,學生很喜歡她的(叫Snooyp校長)。但後來她同協恩中學校長在行政上傾不埋,所以辭職。

其實好坦白講林校長係簡介會上講到幾出色都好,能否實踐到,都要 ...

Don't understand why people just like to say such meaningless comment to YW. Same can apply to 任竹嬌 or even 張灼祥

poorpapa

原文章由 liverpoolfan 於 07-12-7 13:57 發表
Don't understand why people just like to say such meaningless comment to YW. Same can apply to 任竹嬌 or even 張灼祥

好似娛樂圈，名氣大就多批評多事非，有fans有仇家。

[ 本文章最後由 poorpapa 於 07-12-7 14:33 編輯 ]

mamay

I am a YW fan and I will apply YW for my son.

However, if LS accepts my son, I will take it as it is an excellent traditional school with proven track record.  Most importantly, it comes with 12 years free of charge.

One point to note :
YW is a "one dragon" that you can go to Secondary school if you pass the exam with required mark.

I am not sure if LS is "one dragon" but seems that not all the primary student will got to Secondary school.