老師用這種罰學生方法, 是否合理? 我很不開心, 請給意見.......

麟媽媽

點為之「靜雞雞」呢？
如果沒有犯點會被責名呢？
唔通班長四圍行叫人唔好咁、唔好咁….
如果唔係責名喇！佢地要自覺嘛。
孩子要有self discipline，
我個仔亦唔係好乖之輩，
舊年一年班本手冊紅當當！
但你會慢慢見有進步的，
佢地好醒架，會學曉唔好再係咁既。
我仔二年班了，開學都好少再被寫手冊了。
我地家長最愛見孩子進步，
責名、寫手冊、被罰在一生中佔好少好少，
從而學到如何對應為將來更為有用。

geppetto 寫道:
認為班長靜雞雞集名無問題乎？

hhma

我想問下其實各位係咪都係香港讀小學既呢?
我當年小學都會用甘既方法架啦
即係老師下權比班長做野...
甘當年我地會唔會覺得有問題呢?
又可以點解決呢?
我記得我細佬試過比風紀罰抄中文課文八次....
甘風紀做錯野又點呢?  邊個集風紀既名呢?

又比如點解我遲到唔得, 老細遲到又得呢?    
好似愈講愈遠tim, sorry

geppetto

埃,大家思想方法唔同。

麟媽媽 寫道:
點為之「靜雞雞」呢？
如果沒有犯點會被責名呢？
唔通班長四圍行叫人唔好咁、唔好咁….
如果唔係責名喇！佢地要自覺嘛。
孩子要有self discipline，
我個仔亦唔係好乖之輩，
舊年一年班本手冊紅當當！
但你會慢慢見有進步的，
佢地好醒架，會學曉唔好再係咁既。
我仔二年班了，開學都好少再被寫手冊了。
我地家長最愛見孩子進步，
責名、寫手冊、被罰在一生中佔好少好少，
從而學到如何對應為將來更為有用。

[quote]
geppetto 寫道:
認為班長靜雞雞集名無問題乎？

[/quote]

睡覺

每個人想法都有出入...
係呀...如果唔係，點會有d老師咁懲罰學生....

只係一洩佢地...「犯事丫喇﹗睇你仲死唔死...亨...活該﹗搞事丫喇﹗」 心頭之恨....

麟媽媽

無錯吖，唔同人當然有唔同睇法喇。
只要是針對件事來善意討論，
好好架，多面睇嘛。
所以唔同學校有唔同既校風，
亦有唔同既學習氣氛。
仲有家長同學校既方針是否一致，
都會孕育出不同的孩子。

geppetto 寫道:
埃,大家思想方法唔同。

[quote]
麟媽媽 寫道:
點為之「靜雞雞」呢？
如果沒有犯點會被責名呢？
唔通班長四圍行叫人唔好咁、唔好咁….
如果唔係責名喇！佢地要自覺嘛。
孩子要有self discipline，
我個仔亦唔係好乖之輩，
舊年一年班本手冊紅當當！
但你會慢慢見有進步的，
佢地好醒架，會學曉唔好再係咁既。
我仔二年班了，開學都好少再被寫手冊了。
我地家長最愛見孩子進步，
責名、寫手冊、被罰在一生中佔好少好少，
從而學到如何對應為將來更為有用。

[quote]
geppetto 寫道:
認為班長靜雞雞集名無問題乎？

[/quote][/quote]

sleeping-beauty

孩子在學校受

Wnnieng

I am very angry after read your msg.  I won't accept this punishment method.  The teacher won't respect the students.  If I were you, I would complain the teacher.
  

geppetto

學校應該是教導同鼓勵的地方。

24孝阿媽

     我認為選擇得作為老師這份職業的話,  應要抱有教育好下一代的高尚情操才好,  否則若只作打一份工,好福利, 無投訴, 平穩過渡的心態,  甚至有些將個人不滿的情緒, 發洩在小孩身上,(如擲粉刷. 粉筆)  就不要揀老師作

sheenaho

學校應該是教導同鼓勵的地方。

agree.

'往地獄之路由善意砌成'.

Cathyneo

[quote]
24孝阿媽 寫道:
     我認為選擇得作為老師這份職業的話,  應要抱有教育好下一代的高尚情操才好,  否則若只作打一份工,好福利, 無投訴, 平穩過渡的心態,  甚至有些將個人不滿的情緒, 發洩在小孩身上,(如擲粉刷. 粉筆)  就不要揀老師作

yanma2004

24孝阿媽


So sad to see this message,  why don't discuss with the principal Mr. Chan. he is a good principal and willing to accept all the opinion.

CD

我細個最憎就係D班長, o個D班長真係好鍾意責名, 如果吾乖, 多野講, 被責名無話可說。但係佢地真係玩針對, friend o既就吾責, 吾friend就責多D   


吾知移家D班長會吾會o甘o尼?

24孝阿媽

      我只是想說現時作為老師的質素問題,  而帶出好似我們讀書時期的老師對待學生方式,, 以擲粉筆, 扭耳朵...等都

24孝阿媽

RE:  Cathyneo  ,,,,

[quote]
24孝阿媽 寫道:
      我只是想說現時作為老師的質素問題,  而帶出好似我們讀書時期的老師對待學生方式,, 以擲粉筆, 扭耳朵...等都

ikiiki

I agreed too. I hate such punishment way.
Whatever how naughty she is, she is only a
P.2  kid. Need care, love and patient.......
Express your unsatisfied to her teacher or headmaster.   

LLT

I think many of you may not be agreeable with me.  I have no objection to punishment on kids, even physical punishment if necessary.

It may be increditable to you that my wife and I did authorise our Filipino maid to beat up our kids if they are too naughty and out of control, subject only to the condition that no excessive force be used.  They need to be taught to behave properly and to respect others, including a maid.

I think the task of teachers is much more easier only if they are willing to give up our children that neither reprimand nor punishment of any kind is to be given to them notwithstanding they do anything wrong or behave improperly.  This can also avoid the risk of being complained by the parents.

My wife and me will never make complaint against the teacher who punishes our kids if they derserve for it.  On the contrary, we will appreciate for his/her effort, which is for the good of our sons.

geppetto

Hi LLT,

Do not beat your child, especially never let your maid to do so. It is really a wrong way, except very very special case.

Punishment is the easiest way to control others. But not for such junior students.

LLT 寫道:
I think many of you may not be agreeable with me.  I have no objection to punishment on kids, even physical punishment if necessary.

It may be increditable to you that my wife and I did authorise our Filipino maid to beat up our kids if they are too naughty and out of control, subject only to the condition that no excessive force be used.  They need to be taught to behave properly and to respect others, including a maid.

I think the task of teachers is much more easier only if they are willing to give up our children that neither reprimand nor punishment of any kind is to be given to them notwithstanding they do anything wrong or behave improperly.  This can also avoid the risk of being complained by the parents.

My wife and me will never make complaint against the teacher who punishes our kids if they derserve for it.  On the contrary, we will appreciate for his/her effort, which is for the good of our sons.

Cathyneo

24孝媽咪
我想重申對你囡囡老師的處罰方法我覺得是有值得商榷的餘地，例如可在午膳後才罰，而且我亦不清楚你囡囡做了甚麼事被罰，但我對小朋友做錯事的處理方法我是很堅持的。小朋友要面對及承擔後果。我提出的方法是恩威並施，賞罰分明，並不是不停的罰...罰...罰。我亦不讚同用令學生尷尬來處罰。
小朋友是要不斷鼓勵及讚賞，引導他們向好的方向前進，但同時亦要使他們明白做錯事的後果，例如失去玩樂的時間。
正如成年人都要守法律，犯法便要坐牢。試想想若果社會失去法律，我們的生命還受到保障嗎？
囡囡在這小學一年多，老師是否只有罰，沒有讚賞，我想只有你最清楚，若是，早點轉校吧！讓這間學校早點被殺吧！
BK裏的媽咪提過有很多學校是很有教育理想，例如鮮魚行學校，早兩天看報紙，有富商被學校的辦學熱誠吸引，捐了一百萬給學校，還有很多其他的學校可試。
Cathy

淋雨

本人並不認同老師對一名小二學生用罰企食飯的方法作懲罰,相信用其他方法會較好。
明白家長們十分關心自己孩子，也希望孩子能在老師的愛心和鼓勵下成長，這樣的懲罰未必適用於一個小二學生，老師的做法是否不愛護和不尊重學生呢？向校長或班主任投訴事件，一來可解家長的心結，二來希望投訴以後不再發生類似的事件。
然而，家長有權揀學校，卻無權揀老師。家校合作是建基於互信的關係，不是動輒就投訴。
這是一件小事，按孩子的適應能力可能很快便過去淡忘了，但家長的投訴或質疑卻會令老師產生戒心，影響家校合作。本人認為，家長是教導孩子而不是去教導老師。不應以一件事情便去質疑老師曾經為孩子所做過的一切，是次事件處理得不太好，並不代表老師是不愛學生。反之，孩子學習面對逆境是一種寶貴的經驗，家長應該在旁鼓勵、安慰和支持，底線是孩子可以承受是次懲罰。
本人可以投訴一名售貨員的態度，也可投訴一名公務員做事敷衍塞責，但卻不會因一件老師罰學生（底線是學生能夠承受的懲罰）的事情而去投訴老師。因為不可輕易投訴一位教育自己孩子的老師，即使有機會與老師溝通討論，本人認為家長應持客氣和尊重老師權威的態度，家校合作互相信任，才使家長繼續安心讓孩子在該校讀書和成長，否則轉校也是一種選擇。
家長動輒為孩子出頭，會影響老師在孩子心目中的地位，對孩子學習尊重權威和過群體生活有好處嗎？孩子能在逆境中昂首闊步，因為他們曾經經歷「合理的要求是訓練、不合理的要求是一種磨練、無論合理還是不合理都是一種鍛煉。」