關於集團
集團品牌
presslogic-logo
廣告查詢
工作機會
用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小學雜談 越來越多好中學轉直資/一條龍, 小學選校策略應否改變 ...
樓主: judy
go

越來越多好中學轉直資/一條龍, 小學選校策略應否改變 [複製鏈接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


204
41#
發表於 04-11-21 01:29 |只看該作者

Re: 越來越多好中學轉直資/一條龍, 小學選校策略應否改變

Rasseles,

Hello! Clarian!!
I'm also waiting for the day of Celebrate80週年校慶. I graduated in 1987, and have a daughter in P2 now. How about U?


Collin

Rank: 3Rank: 3


240
42#
發表於 04-11-21 08:01 |只看該作者

Re: 越來越多好中學轉直資/一條龍, 小學選校策略應否改變

Dear Collin,

Please check P.M.

Regards
Rasseles

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4775
43#
發表於 04-11-22 23:48 |只看該作者

Re: 越來越多好中學轉直資/一條龍, 小學選校策略應否改變

立人兄:

一條龍中小學真的有絕對優勝嗎? I have a different view.

Under the proposed mechanism for English Secondary Schools, a secondary school is qualified to be an EMI only if it can satisfy 3 criteria - sufficient English media teachers, good faciliites for EMI and adequate English-adapted students (at least 85% under the proposal).

If a train-thru secondary school has to accept all students of its primary school. It has less chance to select students from outside. If those P6 students are not good enough in English and less than 85% cannot meet EMI requirements in consecutive years, the seconday school cannot be qualified as an EMI school. You know if it has been classified as Chinese secondary school, both the secondary and primary schools will be less attractive to the parents. The  effects will circulates.

Anyway, I think most dragon schools now are good  now, but NOT ALL are good. In particular, those government/subsidised schools will face higher risk as they have no right to choose students from P1.

Therefore I would prefer to choose a English media primary school no matter it is a train-through school, because these graduates are supposed to be more 搶手under the proposed regime.

How is your view?

Rank: 3Rank: 3


114
44#
發表於 04-11-23 08:12 |只看該作者

Re: 越來越多好中學轉直資/一條龍, 小學選校策略應否改變

"我同事個仔讀La Salle,佢話同學仔有D大抽獎入到,開學一段時間老師就不斷打電話比家長,勸小朋友退學,因為成績唔好,父母又無物學識,雖然學校提供好嘅學習環境,但都有"汰弱留强"既機制,去確保小朋友之間沒有太大的差距,影响教學進度。
名校始終有優勢,因為不斷有好學生去插班。

happyeasy"

我想問,官津學校有無條例唔比踢學生走,同埋唔比留班,因為我記得有人咁同我講過,佢帶個女去加拿大成大半年,可以停學留位,番唻又讀過。

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11251
45#
發表於 04-11-23 10:09 |只看該作者

Re: 越來越多好中學轉直資/一條龍, 小學選校策略應否改變

立人,

因此我的意見是"從龍"之時也要"擇龍而噬",而並非盲目選擇,需因應孩子和家長的期望、能力慎而擇之。


官津校師資一樣、編制一樣、加上"從龍"後收生没有分別,學校間之分別越來越小。加上學校黑箱作業。請指教,怎樣"擇龍而噬"呢?

在報上,常聽說教改令教師疲於奔命。但私底下,很多教師稱主要是新生少,他們需"做嘢"去吸引家長。官津校是一超級大飯碗,教師如不犯程序上之錯誤,無論他多無能,也難請他走。我想問:"從龍"後學校間之分別越來越小,教師會不會因競争少了,而又不用"做嘢"呢?

Rank: 4


708
46#
發表於 04-11-23 10:22 |只看該作者

Re: 越來越多好中學轉直資/一條龍, 小學選校策略應否改變


我唔清楚,不過學校都只係勸,唔係迫。


beseem2003 寫道:

我想問,官津學校有無條例唔比踢學生走,同埋唔比留班,因為我記得有人咁同我講過,佢帶個女去加拿大成大半年,可以停學留位,番唻又讀過。
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖