- 在線時間
- 742 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-2-20
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 17708
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 12-10-31
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 14632
- 主題
- 20
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 32340
- UID
- 1049305
![Rank: 11](/static/image/common//star_level3.gif) ![Rank: 11](/static/image/common//star_level3.gif) ![Rank: 11](/static/image/common//star_level2.gif) ![Rank: 11](/static/image/common//star_level1.gif)
|
ANChan59 發表於 18-3-4 13:10 ![](static/image/common/back.gif)
我冇一定撐老師,你自己假設及想當然!你撐他們是專業,我話他們不是專業,我點撐呢?
我跟學校有好多溝 ...
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 18-3-4 13:32 編輯
你唔係盲撑老師,便是對老師有不合理的寬容。
不要任何話題也扯到整體教育問題,這題目關於有老師講了一些涼薄的話,可不可以集中說老師的話。
有問題一定係管理層,前線無選擇。這想法係錯的。我上文用巴士意外司機查明危駕便要坐監,便是例子。 Nothing the management do can be an excuse for reckless driving by the front line driver. they have to go to jail.
If teachers did something contrary to what teachers should do (eg protect students, help students develop themselves, teach them the best teachers can, use what teachers learned in teachers program in University to give the best to students etc), they should be condemned too. Nothing the management do should be an excuse for teachers.
they are teachers and with that comes certain responsibilities only teachers can do. They are not factory workers.
BTW, 我見過不少「專業有牌」工程師,人工低過老師校長好多。說甚麽香港要投資教育,加大教育資源,大部分又唔係入老師袋?! 如果老師只收工廠啤工人工,教育資源增加落哂教育局呀太同學校管理層,咁我比較易接受。
![](http://www.baby-kingdom.com/static/image/common/android_v2.gif?v=2.2) |
|