用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小學雜談 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?
樓主: 淋雨
go

新小拔與舊小拔有何分別? [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1163
21#
發表於 05-9-28 15:08 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

Hi  haohao

若今年就讀舊小拔一年班
想請問 即使第日好彩入到大拔  

Rank: 3Rank: 3


245
22#
發表於 05-9-28 15:21 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

係,大拔已經吾參加升中派位喇,除左DBSPD through train所有人都係考入去嘅。一律要俾學費。不過可以申請減免。首要讀書叻同運動出色。

Rank: 3Rank: 3


167
23#
發表於 05-9-28 16:18 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

請問舊小拔是否指九龍九龍塘志士達道一及三號那間?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2906
24#
發表於 05-9-28 16:30 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

係呀,即CCKG隔離
Micmic 寫道:
請問舊小拔是否指九龍九龍塘志士達道一及三號那間?

Rank: 3Rank: 3


141
25#
發表於 05-9-28 17:11 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

LilyMaMa 寫道:
Of course 新小拔 la.......


if you believe so ........  




Rank: 5Rank: 5


1163
26#
發表於 05-9-28 17:23 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

KatieM1203 寫道:
[quote]
LilyMaMa 寫道:
Of course 新小拔 la.......


if you believe so ........  






[/quote] :妳是否有其宓它高見       可否分享

Rank: 3Rank: 3


149
27#
發表於 05-9-28 17:37 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

Hi KatieM1203,

Does it mean you do not think DBSPD is better than DPS? Would you care to share your views?  

I would have thought the new DBSPD is better too in terms of:
1) teachers (as I heard many old teachers from DPS have left and joined DBSPD instead),
2) 'through train' to secondary school,
3) building and facilities,
4) ECAs (I believe there are more ECAs available?)

Drawback is of course it's fees paying now, and I heard with regular fund raising events too?

        

Rank: 3Rank: 3


141
28#
發表於 05-9-28 18:17 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

Chatterbox 寫道:
Hi KatieM1203,

Does it mean you do not think DBSPD is better than DPS? Would you care to share your views?  

I would have thought the new DBSPD is better too in terms of:
1) teachers (as I heard many old teachers from DPS have left and joined DBSPD instead),
2) 'through train' to secondary school,
3) building and facilities,
4) ECAs (I believe there are more ECAs available?)

Drawback is of course it's fees paying now, and I heard with regular fund raising events too?

        




I see your points, but how would all these contribute to DPS P.6 students "入到大拔都會讀得好辛苦,始終直資同官津的課程是有分別的"

"Which of these two schools is better?"
I have yet comment on this part, althought I have my own preference and so do other parents.

But what I questioned was DPS has lower academic standard than DBSPD, so DPS students will have hard time catching up with the DBS standard.


Rank: 3Rank: 3


149
29#
發表於 05-9-28 22:35 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

Hi KatieM1203,

Oh I see...we were talking about different things. I have no idea about their relative standards. Perhaps existing parents will be more qualified to answer that.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


248
30#
發表於 05-9-29 00:41 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

Funny 寫道:
代友問, 如果是天主教徒, 報DPS, 是否冇宗教分?  一定要基督教徒才有分?  Thanks a lot.


要係「聖公會」才有分嫁。  




HaoHao de Baba ... 皓 皓 的 爸 爸 ---------

Rank: 3Rank: 3


248
31#
發表於 05-9-29 00:50 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

Lyn 寫道:
Haohao,

請問大拔有幾多班? 同時能收100%的新小拔和85%的舊小拔?



大拔有 6 班中一,每班收不超過 40 人,實際多數都係 38 人,6 班中一共有 240 個位置,新小拔最終會有 5 班小六,每班 30 人,一共 150 直升中一;舊小拔的兩班小六,每班 33人,85% 共有 56 人升大拔。240 個位,收新小拔 150人和舊小拔 56 人,仲有 34 個位剩。

大家可以考入去呀!







HaoHao de Baba ... 皓 皓 的 爸 爸 ---------

Rank: 3Rank: 3


248
32#
發表於 05-9-29 00:56 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

LilyMaMa 寫道:
好似唔係咁喎, 小拔在 2010 / 2011 年「脫鉤」(唔記得邊年),應該咁講,於04/05入讀的小拔學生才可直上大拔,直至六年級即2010/2011才劃上句號。
而06年轉男女,就算讀到六年級,表面上都沒有甚麼優勢,都要參加統一派位K3網,但如果成績好好的男生,我相信會有機會推(箭)入大拔的,有幾多位只有校方才知,但我相信入到大拔都會讀得好辛苦,始終直資同官津的課程是有分別的。



正如 KatieM1203 所 point out,我都想知點解你會覺得舊小拔的成績唔會比得上新小拔? :wink:


HaoHao de Baba ... 皓 皓 的 爸 爸 ---------

Rank: 3Rank: 3


248
33#
發表於 05-9-29 00:58 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

[quote]
mansdom 寫道:
Hi  haohao

若今年就讀舊小拔一年班
想請問 即使第日好彩入到大拔  
HaoHao de Baba ... 皓 皓 的 爸 爸 ---------

Rank: 4


728
34#
發表於 05-9-29 10:45 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

我相信04/05入讀的小拔學生的成績唔會有太大的差距,因還可直上大拔,要連接大拔的課程。
但有沒有想過點解有舊小拔的學生和老師會過擋新小拔呢?在學生來說直上大拔是最主要的因數,因過擋直資,全數學生都要收無論係band 1 or band 2生,但直資要收學費、要交待成績,故課程、教法一定是有分別的,而且直資小拔唔係唔使讀架,可能係讀得活D,像外國式D學校,教學生去尋找、解決問題。
雖然04/05入讀的舊小拔的學生仍可直上大拔,但如果有兩小孩分別在這兩所學校讀P.1開始,你估會否有分別呢?當然最後兩個都入到大拔,如果兩間小拔都一樣課程、教法,咁要間直資來做甚麼呢?還要家長交5、6年學費,right?

在這重申: 我只討論這兩所學校的分別,而不是小朋友的質數,或故意貶低他人。

而今年首年變男女官津,我相信會寬D,因學校要適應新老師、新女同學的轉變。

Rank: 3Rank: 3


141
35#
發表於 05-9-29 11:28 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

LilyMaMa 寫道:
我相信04/05入讀的小拔學生的成績唔會有太大的差距,因還可直上大拔,要連接大拔的課程。
但有沒有想過點解有舊小拔的學生和老師會過擋新小拔呢?在學生來說直上大拔是最主要的因數,因過擋直資,全數學生都要收無論係band 1 or band 2生,但直資要收學費、要交待成績,故課程、教法一定是有分別的,而且直資小拔唔係唔使讀架,可能係讀得活D,像外國式D學校,教學生去尋找、解決問題。
雖然04/05入讀的舊小拔的學生仍可直上大拔,但如果有兩小孩分別在這兩所學校讀P.1開始,你估會否有分別呢?當然最後兩個都入到大拔,如果兩間小拔都一樣課程、教法,咁要間直資來做甚麼呢?還要家長交5、6年學費,right?

在這重申: 我只討論這兩所學校的分別,而不是小朋友的質數,或故意貶低他人。

而今年首年變男女官津,我相信會寬D,因學校要適應新老師、新女同學的轉變。



I think you might be one of the few parents who have ever questioned about DPS's academic standard.

Frankly, it does not have anything to do with DBSPD or any other primary schools. Just to talk about DPS herself, I would say most DPS students have very high standard. I am talking about DPS IS ONE OF THE TOPS in HK. Especially their English standard.

I am not only saying all this without supporting information. To name one, DPS is the overall champion of the "I CUBE 校際智能爭霸戰" this year.

http://www.icube.hk/competition/award.asp

icube is a all-rounded academic knowledge competition. Consider DPS has only 2 classes per level, it isn't bad at all. I just suprise if a parent will think DPS  (I CUBE 校際智能爭霸戰 -- 全場總冠軍: 拔萃小學) students will have hard time catching up in DBS.   

There are some DPS students changed school to DBSPD, but most of them (over 90%) stays. For those who changed school to DBSPD, they are still the minority there. If you ask around, you will find out SFA and APS are the majority in DBSPD. So, what does your logic suggest SFA and APS then?

DBSPD is a great school, and I just try to point out that DPS is not worse than her.



No offense, but if you can find out more about DPS and DBSPD, I'm sure you will have a different point of view.




Rank: 5Rank: 5


1173
36#
發表於 05-9-29 11:42 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

Haohao,

多謝你的詳細資料.
看來你對三間拔萃都甚明瞭. 新小拔用什麼英文書? 舊小拔今年改用Collins, 已往不知是否用Longman? 你點睇?

Rank: 4


728
37#
發表於 05-9-29 12:03 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

KatieM1203 ,
我同意拔萃小學是一間高質數的學校(包括學生),但我是看長遠的前景的,我們的題目是"新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?"
我相信大家的看法是有分別,或許留待時間的証明吧!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


282
38#
發表於 05-9-29 12:22 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

如果有一個家長,其兒子新舊小拔都取錄,撇開經濟因素,這位家長如何取捨呢?
新小拔的簡介會中,家長們得知新小拔的教學法像外國學校的做法,做專題研習,從搜集資料中尋找答案及整理資料作出匯報。然而,舊小拔的教學法如何呢?舊小拔學生得獎是家長背後的投資還是學校的教學法成功呢?如有舊小拔的家長可以現身說法便更好了。

Rank: 3Rank: 3


141
39#
發表於 05-9-29 13:27 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

淋雨 寫道:
如果有一個家長,其兒子新舊小拔都取錄,撇開經濟因素,這位家長如何取捨呢?


I am one of them.

My son is in DPS P.2 now. My son got accepted by both school last year, and I chose DPS, and in fact, there are quite a few kids in DPS are of the same case, who got accepted by both school and chose DPS.

Of course there are many parents whose kids got accepted by both schools and chose DBSPD. All parents are in fact trying to pick the best for their kids, and they all have their own reasons and preferences. Mine was not financial.

新小拔的簡介會中,家長們得知新小拔的教學法像外國學校的做法,做專題研習,從搜集資料中尋找答案及整理資料作出匯報。然而,舊小拔的教學法如何呢?


It doesn't matter what was said in the Briefing session, it is what was conducted in school.

To discuss "像外國學校的做法":

If having "專題研習" is one of the major concerns for parents, DPS has that too, for all levels' students and for all major subjects.  Well, a lot of schools have that too.

If "像外國學校的做法" is less restricted disciplines in class and in school .... sorry to disappoint some parents, starting this year, the school now needs each teacher to enforce disciplines. So, it is ended up similar to the DPS way.

舊小拔學生得獎是家長背後的投資還是學校的教學法成功呢?如有舊小拔的家長可以現身說法便更好了。



The family supports of DPS students are just like the family supports of most of the other "famous schools".



Rank: 3Rank: 3


245
40#
發表於 05-9-29 13:50 |只看該作者

Re: 新小拔與舊小拔有何分別?

2004班的P1學生和2005班以後的P1學生相比,家長有一個很重大的條件需要注意。

2004/05 尚未脫鈎,P1生有85%入大拔,餘下幾個大小拔有商量。只要維持成績好過最差15%就入梗大拔。2005以後舊小拔guarantee入大拔係0%,升中係要同全港精英爭入直資大拔,今年小一開學已經有吾少功課喇。吾計錢,又兩間都收,DBSPD啦。
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖