真道中、小家長聚談

deniset

Hi qq_dad,
I hv no idea this time. I just picked the poem, filled out the application form and returned it to the class teacher. My girl told me that the teacher recited both poems to them yesterday. I guess they would leave the rest to us....meaning, there won't be any formal training. Last year, the procedure was similar. I just let my girl do her own practice at home whenever she felt like. Don't worry, the children are smart and they can manage pretty well on their own. Don't give too much pressure to yourself. Take it casually and encourage her to stand before the audience. It's a fun experience for the children. My girl and all her classmates enjoyed it very much last year.
deniset




由 qq_dad 於 2006-09-11 22:51:47

Hi deniset,

My daughter originally planned to go with best her classmates and joined the group. However, the teacher told her that there is only single.  

Finally she decided to join the Single, Cantonese. I am glad to hear that.

My daughter told me that the teacher would pick the Poem for those who join the competition. However, the school notice stated that there is no individual training. So I get confused. Do you know the school means 1) pick the poem for pupul, 2) no training for them. Just want to clarify and prepare for it.

qq_dad

Hi deniset,

Noted with thanks.  Also share your viewpoint.

zoemaywang

hi qq dad my daugher enjoy and happy school

qq_dad

hi zoemaywang,

glad to hear that.  

Haha-ho

今早入PA Forum 發現多了一些激辯, 有沒有家長看過呀?!   
這是好現象, 唔似以往那樣鬼甘靜一潭死水甘

另外亦有篇言論關於校車事情.
QUOTE:

校車超載 \ 超速及行車線安排問題

啟明旅運已有多年安排學校校車事宜, 但一直聽聞不少家長討論 / 爭議 / 投訴校車安排不妥.

曾在一次家長會聚會內聽說校長已把校車安排事宜轉交家長會處理.  但年復一年, 事情未見改善, 更因今年增加多了一年級學生及延長放學時間而更加混亂. 不知家長會是否仍有處理這事項?

(1)        以往多年因學生不足或分佈太散, 而未能安排同區同一保姆車. 但今年學生增加不少, 以往安排依舊不變, 同區或附近區之學生仍分配不同保姆車再轉接其他不同區之學生.  因延長放學時間, 保姆車需與不少下班車輛在繁忙時段爭路, 比去年乘車時間更多. 亦有些家長開始計劃在放學之回程乘坐其他交通(的士), 以節省小朋友花費在回程時間 (由1.5小時之回程時間, 變為20-30分鐘車程)

(2)        亦有聽聞校車超速事情, 可能因第一個問題而引伸出來?? 是否學生分佈太散, 司機恐怕不能準時到達學校而超速, 相信有待家長會或學校查證.

(3)        校車超載事情, 聽聞去年已曾發生, 因家長向校長投訴才解決. 但同樣事情便發生在本人小朋友之校車上, 校車多出四位小朋友與及保姆姨只能站立於車內 (保姆姨是否亦應當佔用座位乘客計算呢??).  向校車公司投訴, 所得之回覆 :

(a)        是小朋友低於1.3米便可3位當2位計, 那麼3位小朋友便可逼在2人座位上.
(P.S. 小巴收費都是佔用座位者付車資, 為何我們之小朋友付足車資但仍不能安坐一位??!!!)

(b)        再者, 丘校長曾說校車公司所安排之車輛是最新及每座位都設有安全帶. 即使每天小朋友在回程中睡著也安全!!!  那麼3位小朋友能怎樣共用2條安全帶呢?  校車公司回答是那三位小朋友是不用扣安全帶.

(P.S. 過去曾因小巴交通意外, 政府已推行小巴配備安全帶, 乘客必需配扣安全帶. 那麼小朋友乘坐校車之安全守則, 是否更需扣上安全帶??)


(c)        另校車公司亦回答此超載安排是因很多學生在下午都不會乘回程車, 所以小朋友只在上午擠逼!!!   更是有些中學生通常只在開學首兩個月乘坐, 隨後多數都不再乘坐.

(P.S.
此做法是否保障校車公司收入來源??  而校車公司應否在這情況下減收車資?? 請問有那位家長願意看見自己之小朋友乖坐一輛逼窄及不安全之車輛上學去?? 而校車公司是否應先知詢家長 --- 起碼先知詢那三位小朋友被安排共坐之家長同意此安排.)

校車公司最后把已投訴之家長小朋友不再3人同座, 但一些較小之學生或未被家長發現之小朋友仍有被安排3人同座.

亦有聽聞校車公司多接一所學校之保姆車服務, 因而車輛不足夠安排兩所學校之學生來回程, 而出現超載 \ 超速與及一車安排行走兩次早上車程.

在商言商, 校車公司之安排手法是為保障營運成本, 與及安排行車路線有一定難度.  

但站在家長立場, 永遠想自己子女得到最佳安排, 撇掉這想法是否應以安全為大前題呢??

其次若校車公司不能安排足夠車輛接載學生, 家長會/學校可否引入多一間(或多間)校車公司分區安排行車路線??

校車安排與大多學生每日適適相關, 相信很多家長除對學校教學事情關心, 校車事宜是另一大關心事項.

希家長會能把此事, 列入家長會其中之一議題.

UNQUOTED.

有否發生在你們小朋友身上呀 :cry:  

waterdrop

Red Signal and Typhoon 3 now, would it be any special arrangement in school? you know, in TKO area, it is even more serious...
dont wanna call the school, as perhaps lots of parents are calling already, maybe telephone jammed already.... any idea?
perhaps i am over reacted, just, worried.

貴花田711

貴花田711

不用緊張, 孩子會留在學校直到放學, 電台都有廣播啦!

alissa

你說得很對呀!  我的小朋友上車是頭站，落車是尾站，很不公平，我亦有同校車公司反映，不過都無辦法，可能他們就其他多學生的站，鬼叫肉除砧板上，希望學校能引入其他褓母車公司，有競爭才有進步，我們亦多一些選擇。    

風雨同路

剛看到PA Forum 澄清校車安排不是由『家長會』處理的。

知道現在的營運成本漲價不少，我們幾條的將軍澳本區線，同一輛校車在區內來回多次，接載幾所不同的學校的學生是可以理解的，但也須將孩子們準時送抵學校又不超速及衝燈啊！

我們那一條線的司機和姨姨的態度仍然繼續惡劣，什麼『我只是打工的，有什麼事和我老闆講…』

學校又說應由我們家長直接和校車公司溝通？！

真的很無奈…   可能要買定架單車，俾仔仔踩番學！

zoemaywang

u can tell school on  thurday

deniset

Dear 風雨同路, Haha-ho, and all,
The school reiterates and claims that they don't operate the school bus.
Here the PA says they don't run it either (meaning hands off and has no control)
So, who on earth is responsible??,
Do we just let the bus company arrange whichever way they like?  This is ridiculous!!
We need to bring this up tomorrow and let the school know we're dissatisfied with the present bus service and route arrangement.

風雨同路

Dear deniset, zoemaywang and all,

Thank you.

Nobody seems to be responsible for the schoolbus operation, apart from the schoolbus company themselves.  But they do not appear to have been taking parents' input into consideration.

So the only option is either to "bear" with the existing service, or to arrange for the drop off and pick up ourselves?!

deniset

Dear 風雨同路,
If this is the scenario, our PA got to do something.
For example, to invite some other bus companies to propose their plans. When there is a competition, there is improvement.

風雨同路

相信『家長會』現在可做的應很有限。

知道曾有家長們自僱其他公司的褓母車，但不獲准駛入學校，要在路口下車，由姨姨帶返學校。

軒Mother

我住TKO, 個仔都係搭校車, 之前兩年都好好, 每星期有一日需要在另一個站落車, 校巴公司都安排到, 開學第一個星期, 司機的態度都唔係咁好, 後來我與其他家長向校車負責人反映, 她已在今個星期一換了另一架車比我地, 這幾天很準時   最緊要係坐低慢慢傾, 有商有量, 要求合理。
我都覺得有時家長會可以做的很有限, 好似校車咁, 因為合約是學校與校巴公司的, 理應由學校幫我們跟進  

軒Mother

我都有聽過有家長自己搵褓母車, 唔准入學校, 其實學校應該改善吓, 因為有d路線校巴公司自己都做唔到, 咁點解唔可以方便下

風雨同路 寫道:
相信『家長會』現在可做的應很有限。

知道曾有家長們自僱其他公司的褓母車，但不獲准駛入學校，要在路口下車，由姨姨帶返學校。

qq_dad

For the bus route, I directly talked to Mr Ko (the bus company) last week to express the route problem.  Actually, he was willing to change the route as long as the parents on the same route agree.

I think it may be one of the way to solve the problem.  With the help of PA to review the route will surely be a bonus.

貴花田711

唉! 新學年梗係問題多多, 間間學校都係咁, 大家比d時間啦!

zoemaywang

who go to school on thrday?