教學用電子書真的好嗎？

shadeslayer

IloveJJ 發表於 18-5-22 23:54
你又誤解啦？我絕對唔認為個女仔係暴力欺凌，打人唔等於暴力，暴力唔等於欺凌。
你又想轉移視線? :badfeel ...

哈哈，打人都唔等如暴力，打人唔等於欺凌，但單打就是欺凌。

我打你一拳，但我沒有行使暴力對待你？不要混澈視聽？。。。。笑死人。

打人，係行使暴力的一種。

如果你打完人被人拉，你同法官解釋打人同暴力的分别喇。

重有， Jane 和我一開始是講「打人」的，和你用字一樣，當然係你在#145同意左我意思。

你D邏輯同混淆令人驚訝。以為出聲的人等於所有看題目的人。

shadeslayer

IloveJJ 發表於 18-5-22 23:59
不想多說!

So what？

shadeslayer

IloveJJ 發表於 18-5-23 00:01
既然無事實基礎，你憑乜用佔中人士因為打人而坐花廳來反証你認為「打人一定有罪」既觀點呢？你係自相矛盾
...

哂氣，我己講過，再講多次，我從未說過「打人一定有罪」咁簡單一句，反而係你在#145 自己說「個女仔打人係唔啱」你攻擊緊自己的觀點嗎？你知唔知自己做緊乜。

你無心看清楚，無時間看清楚，無能力看清楚，可以不出聲的。

shadeslayer

IloveJJ 發表於 18-5-23 00:09
你既頭腦真係有問題，仲反而話人混淆  
我今晚得閒先同你玩辯論，但你太無質素，我瞓啦！ :sleep ...

面你人地比，。。。。下删五個字。

shadeslayer

IloveJJ 發表於 18-5-23 00:20
你都打錯好多字喎!你嗰句無時間睇清楚、無能力睇清楚，係咪應該同自己講呢？
而且「面係人哋俾」呢句，我 ...

嗱嗱嗱，我無話個女仔無學好成人世界的事。咪胡扯一番當有理先得架。口舌欺凌，難判斷，不易有共識。因為别人講一些唔好聽的事，而「被迫」打人，就好易判斷。對方立即有証據指控女孩「欺凌」，十分諷刺。

我常常被人討論中途，被扯去中文方面，不再講道理，顧左右而言他，原因顯然易見。

MrBeast

shadeslayer 發表於 18-5-22 23:23
The news did not prove your argument right and did not prove my argument wrong.

我想美國有無數案例
http://hk.on.cc/int/bkn/cnt/news/20160924/mobile/bknint-20160924110215724-0924_17011_001.html

shadeslayer

MrBeast 發表於 18-5-23 06:51
我想美國有無數案例
http://hk.on.cc/int/bkn/cnt/news/20160924/mobile/bknint-20160924110215724-0924_17 ...

No amount of individual cases would prove me wrong.

I am saying if you shoot a burglar you may or may not get into trouble because it depends on the situation. In other words, you cannot assume you shoot a burglar and use self defense as a defense.

I brought up that example to say that self defense is difficult to use even in burglary cases, someone coming into your own home, let alone the girl case, resorting to violence when somebody teases you.

MrBeast

shadeslayer 發表於 18-5-23 07:21
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 18-5-23 07:22 編輯

No amount of individual cases would prove me wrong. ...

dead man dont argue his case

shadeslayer

MrBeast 發表於 18-5-23 07:28
dead man dont argue his case

Seriously.  If that is the case, no murder case can be successful because dead man can't argue.

Don't believe me, believe Google.

b3410

點解講電子教學變作講bully

MrBeast

shadeslayer 發表於 18-5-23 08:14
Seriously.  If that is the case, no murder case can be successful because dead man can't argue.

D ...

I brlieve locals

MrBeast

shadeslayer 發表於 18-5-23 08:14
Seriously.  If that is the case, no murder case can be successful because dead man can't argue.

D ...

But seriously, in the first vid, the off duty officer shot to kill, for a reason

shadeslayer

MrBeast 發表於 18-5-23 08:29
I brlieve locals

You believe what you want to believe.  But intrusion or burglar alone is not sufficient condition to give anyone the right to kill and use self defense as defense.  Likewise, verbal abuse alone does not give you the right to resort to violence and use self defense as defense.  Most probably.

shadeslayer

MrBeast 發表於 18-5-23 08:32
But seriously, in the first vid, the off duty officer shot to kill, for a reason

Let's discuss further if after you reviewed exactly what I am saying and researched "self defense".

MrBeast

shadeslayer 發表於 18-5-23 08:47
Let's discuss further if after you reviewed exactly what I am saying and researched "self defense". ...

Ok but Dont hold ur breath

Jane1983

聽得多欺凌事，有感：

1）大人話：bully呀叫花名呀呢d嘢，成日都有，你唔理佢，佢覺得無聊會停。唔一定，更多細路係會escalate 。無人叫停佢，佢覺得好得戚，越玩越大。
2）學校：小事唔想理，出事急住理。到家長好強硬，日日見校長，line up大堆人證，表明唔怕搞大件事，就即刻龜縮。難怪造就惡人家長，因為學校係欺善怕惡的多。

3）bully你唔趁佢細個教好佢，遲早係社會毒瘤。

shadeslayer

Jane1983 發表於 18-5-23 08:53
聽得多欺凌事，有感：

1）大人話：bully呀叫花名呀呢d嘢，成日都有，你唔理佢，佢覺得無聊會停。唔一定， ...

我諗這裏無人認同欺凌，或同意學校縱容欺凌。但文明社會凡事講証據，暴力性欺凌容易舉証，非暴力性欺凌十分難判斷或舉証。

唔係証明某某講左乜，係証明這些言語已明確跌入「欺凌」定義中。叫花名在每一校，每一班房，無日無之。是講笑？是百厭？是言語欺凌？

所以我「明白」學校難處理花名之類的欺凌投訴。