涉抄襲考生來自現代書院

ANChan59

涉抄襲考生來自現代書院 (19:45)


現代書院證實，涉嫌抄襲被取消中文科成績的23名考生是該校學生，也是由同一名老師教授。


[url=]中學文憑[/url]
試明日放榜，考評局稱共發現3宗校本評核抄襲個案，涉及26人。其中在中文科選修單元習作，有23人涉嫌抄襲，他們全來自同一私人教育機構，該23份評核都是由同一名教師評分後呈交上考評局，有關考生抄襲網上資料而未註明出處。


教評局強調，考生手冊有提醒考生校本評核內容必須有原創性，他已約見相關教育機構的校長，研究如何改善。


現代書院其後證實，該23人是該校學生，有關的中文科老師，事發後已被停職。他們的中文科成績將會被取消，變相失去入讀大學的資格。


(即時新聞)

http://inews.mingpao.com/htm/Inews/20130714/gb71945c.htm

JustAParent

ANChan59 發表於 13-7-15 20:15
竟然話個老師太老實，真係服咗佢！

'老師太老實' 可能另有所指.  我小人之心, 商業社會, 呢單野隨時有更有趣的內幕.

那班學生, 讀了六年中學, 功課都唔識抄, 死唔死呀 ?

ANChan59

poem4 發表於 13-7-15 23:56
唔抄襲都可以搵人代做。
校本評核唔應該存在。

I don't know why schools don't use plagiarism software to monitor their students originality of assignments.

poem4

唔抄襲都可以搵人代做。
校本評核唔應該存在。

ANChan59

原帖由 YIN-MA 於 13-07-15 發表
以前寫Paper第一樣要學嘅就係「抄襲」同「引用」嘅分別，但可能現代學店老闆都唔多識分，淨睇住個報價機， ...

竟然話個老師太老實，真係服咗佢！

YIN-MA

以前寫Paper第一樣要學嘅就係「抄襲」同「引用」嘅分別，但可能現代學店老闆都唔多識分，淨睇住個報價機，話之係太誠實定太「不」誠實。。。

ANChan59

Mighty 發表於 13-7-15 18:20
Anchan, you meant as long as I put quotes from xxx (the original source) then its ok? If that is the ...

Yesterday info is not the same as today from HKEAA.
Yesterday, they claimed the students not quote the sources as reference. Today, they claimed the 23 students either copy most of the info from Internet or copy certain percentage from Internet without quoting the sources.

Originally, I thought SBA may be the same as IA of IB, the IA are screened with software like "Turn it in" to check the originality of essay, report, project and assignment before submission.

Mighty

Anchan, you meant as long as I put quotes from xxx (the original source) then its ok? If that is the case, can this be just a careless mistake of those students or being ignorant?

Umi

Thanks!

ANChan59

回復 Umi 的帖子

School based assessment = Internal Assessment, 20% of the overall scores.
Students direct copied articles or essays from internet and not quote the sources.

Umi

其實我唔係好明白e+個考試制度！以前我地考試都會背note架咁點解又唔算係抄襲既

阿女今年升中二, 佢睇完新聞都問我點叫抄襲？因為有d野真係要背的，所以我都5係好識答求大家賜教

ANChan59

我相信是冰山一角，抽樣多些，會有更多。