DR POON playgroup 好嗎?

peace_lin

tst 山林道 dr poon playgroup 好嗎?

irene_the_pooh

原帖由 Gloria0510 於 11-11-18 23:37 發表
我都明白你既想法, 我個囡8個月就開始上playgroup,  我都有你呢個想法, 起初我亞囡上playgroup時真係"牛牛地", 係屋企玩又唔見佢甘牛. 有諗過唔想, 留返d錢同時間. 但老公又想亞囡接觸多d人, 好令佢日後interview時 ...

我小朋友上佢PG時唔「牛」，同上其他PG既反應差唔多，我只係針對佢地既地方同埋內容啫！

不過我第一個回覆都講，其實有D人會覺得好，所以如果有錢有時間不妨去試下！

而我自己試過，我回覆板主既答案就係「唔好」！

sylviaho9

本人都上過DR。POON既PLAYGROUP及學前班，也試過其他的，但我覺得DR POON幾好， 好係佢教你點同小朋友溝通及了解小朋友，還有佢有家長班，家長可以互相分享及鼓勵，並且了解小朋友既進度

如果你只係想小朋友學語言，那就不適合。同埋如果係書本可以學到既，甘我相信好多咩班，咩班都要關門大咭

最好，本人建議你先想想你想小朋友上PLAYGROUP既目的係咩，從而找適合的PLAYGROUP， 希望呢個分享幫到你
1。學語言
2。學音樂
3。親子
4。學了解小朋友

5。LAW証書方便幼稚園INTERVIEW

Gloria0510

我都明白你既想法, 我個囡8個月就開始上playgroup,  我都有你呢個想法, 起初我亞囡上playgroup時真係"牛牛地", 係屋企玩又唔見佢甘牛. 有諗過唔想, 留返d錢同時間. 但老公又想亞囡接觸多d人, 好令佢日後interview時唔會怕生保人. 所以我就俾亞囡讀落去. 之後過左3個月, 開始睇到佢鐘意同小朋友一齊玩. 笑得好大聲, 好開心.上堂時佢好有反應架. 依家亞囡15個月大啦, 一個星期上一堂playgroup, 佢見佢上得好開心. 我又識到一班mami daddy, 大家分亨一下湊小朋友既心得. 其實去邊到上堂, 都有機會接觸細菌. 就算學校叫你著物, 都隔唔開d細菌架(我覺得). 所以我一上完堂就用消毒紙巾去清潔我同亞囡既手同腳. 依家上playgroup係8-10個人, 有家長睇住小朋友, 都叫做可以睇緊d唔好俾小朋友亂甘放野入口. 第時小朋友返學時, 你唔係佢身邊, 到時小朋友仲大機會染病.  
我只得一個囡, 我其實我初時都唔係好識得教我既小朋友, 所以我先決定去上playgroup, 睇下playgroup既老師可唔可以幫到我. 係冇左d family既時間, 不過都係一個鐘姐. 依家我都上左playgroup一段日子, 我都大概知道點教我既小朋友同知道我小朋友既脾性. 如果我唔駛做野, 我都同意自己教, 等自己可以同小朋友相處多d時間, 再一個星期上一次playgroup. 都唔錯架. 我都有睇書去補充一下自己, 因為有時上playgroup, 老師只係教你點教你既小朋友, 而小朋友本身既問題, (例如食野唔多, 發脾氣等等) 我就會睇下d書甘.
依家既小朋友同我地既個代真係唔同, 打打鬧鬧多一d壓力都唔得. 為左小朋友,自己經濟能力又許可, 俾多少少錢都冇計.

kwansara

原帖由 bluigugub 於 11-11-18 11:12 發表
I believe many people in Hong Kong buy things from 鴨寮街 or similar places (i.e. they are essentially selling the same kind of stuffs of similar quality).  

Is it a bit over to say those stuffs are  ...

Agree

rchchan0505

原帖由 bluigugub 於 11-11-18 11:12 發表
I believe many people in Hong Kong buy things from 鴨寮街 or similar places (i.e. they are essentially selling the same kind of stuffs of similar quality).  

Is it a bit over to say those stuffs are  ...

我已開始淘寶夢…

bluigugub

I believe many people in Hong Kong buy things from 鴨寮街 or similar places (i.e. they are essentially selling the same kind of stuffs of similar quality).  

Is it a bit over to say those stuffs are toxic and may "strongly affect a young kids esp babies neurogenic system"???   If this is the case, how should those parents who can only afford to buy stuffs for their kids from 鴨寮街 feel ?

[ 本帖最後由 bluigugub 於 11-11-18 11:15 編輯 ]

kwansara

我同我老公&囝囝都返過好多唔同類型嘅PG, 除了Dr Poon, 縱有Gym, Kindermusik, 奧福, 東山等等.. 我地都最鐘意Dr Poon, 已經返咗兩個Session.

Dr Poon最好嘅地方係側重教家長如何與小朋友相處, 點樣同佢地玩 & 溝通, 可能好多有睇書嘅家長一早知道應該點做(我自己都有睇書), 但係要實踐時, 自己做得是否正確, 力度是否過大/ 過少, 返應有否過急...... 我上Dr Poon 嘅堂最鐘意佢有依方面嘅提點.

所以Dr Poon可能比人一的hea 嘅感覺, 因為佢要時間觀察同指導.

致於清潔, 可能我地返新地址, 無問題.

login_mc

I dislike it too! Other mommies think it's HEA simply because his given games are too basic and simple, you can easily learnt from magazines, books or even websites. The things he said are way to cliche, AND the worse thing is... he told us that his education materials are bought from 鴨寮街, which means they're very low quality products that have high possibility to obtain toxics, this may strongly affect a young kids' (especially a baby) neurogenic system!! Both soft and hard-ware cannot pass my bottom line!

bluigugub

I also like Dr. Poon's playgroup.   

You may be right that some of the theories he mentioned could be found in books, but what we often need are forceful reminders and real-life demonstrations.  For instance, two of the things he keeps stressing are, we need to be positive when talking to our babies, and we have to respect each child's own character and needs.  These are no doubt very "common" advice many books will mention.  but exactly how many know how to implement them?  By attending the playgroup, I understand them now as Dr. Poon keeps demonstrating to us how we should talk to the babies and, more importantly, he keeps reminding/correcting us when we are not doing good enough.  

You are also right that the props he uses are all very simple, and the games he taught can be played by everyone at home.  This is exactly the thing I like.  We are only there 60 minutes a week.  Even if he has very advanced/large scale props, we could only play them once a week.  how useful could that be?  Yet, by teaching us to make use of simple stuffs that can be found at home (like bucket, bottles), we can play with our kids every day every night.  So for me, I would rather leran how to make use of simple stuffs to have fun with my babies.  What Dr. Poon taught us is that there is no need to buy very fancy toys, but by simple stuffs we already can have very great time with our kids.

After all, it is a matter of individual expectation as to which kind of playgroup fits you.  For me, Dr. Poon's playgroup is what I am looking for as it is down-to-earth with lasting effect.

rchchan0505

好神奇啊！囡囡前晚識穿針，大針細針都穿到，嚇傻我啦，佢得3歲10個月jar.

前晚，囡囡話要拿針線玩，跟住話要穿針，我話你穿吾到ga，佢話我穿到ga，我就拿支最大的針比佢穿，點知，佢試左兩下就穿到，嚇得我真係大叫起來！跟住佢話要穿支細針，我話好難ga，你穿吾到ga，佢話我穿到ga，我又拿支細的ga針比佢穿，點知佢試左幾下，就穿到，嚇傻我啦！！！
琴日去推拿，傾起來，醫師話囡囡腦部發展好好、手眼協調好好、專注力極高，佢話佢個囡六、七歲先做到。其實囡囡都有前科，佢2歲9個月時就識得自己打西瓜皮韆鞦，當時我相信她的感觀協調應該很好。囡囡成日叫我比番佢學溜冰，琴晚上第一堂，上完後，囡囡主動話要再練多一陣，我真係老懷安慰！
囡囡吾係天才兒童，不過，現在起碼我知道佢手眼協調好好、專注力極高、感觀協調好、情緒很好、觀察力好、肯主動學習、會動腦筋、有d幽默感，我都心滿意足啦。囡囡係少少屬於敏感型，死都吾肯同人打招呼，我就記住Dr. Poon叫我地要尊重小朋友ga特質，比多d時間佢，只教佢但吾迫佢（當然係用盡渾身解數，吾係說教），終於最近佢肯主動同大堂ee揮手！其實多打韆鞦、多去公園、盡量乜都比佢試（少say no）、以孩子主導、正向鼓勵…都係跟 Dr. Poon學ga。呢d都吾係乜野新野，不過 Dr. Poon 就肉緊d同耐心鼓勵。我無其他mami咁叻，自己睇書就識得用，我需要睇示範、要被人提點，我吾係咁creative，真係要人教我點玩，我先識同bb玩，而且不斷調教反省，先可以做到似樣d（記得最初 Dr. Poon 話有必要時要"兇"d小朋，我都吾知點兇、要幾孟力度，我都叫 Dr. Poon 示範，哈哈）。所以我參加左半年 Dr. Poon Playgroup，之後又參加左半年 Dr.Poon學前班和家長班，一於囡囡學時我又學。Playgroup系舊址上，學前班系新址上，囡囡都無病過，反而一返幼兒園就病！

吾好意思，好似離題，但真的好想分享一下。

仲有，我玩過3班 Dr. Poon Playgroup，每班都有不同的bb，Dr. Poon會記得哂 bb d名，都好用心教，咁吾算 hea 啦， 只係個過程吾係好緊密ge，其實咁又係有理論基礎（但我吾記得係乜野理論啦），係對bb有好處ga。吾知係咪我喜歡呢個模式（定係已經洗左腦…係就好啦），我去果d流程緊密、規規矩矩ga playgroup 反而覺得吾舒服。

[ 本帖最後由 rchchan0505 於 11-11-18 11:12 編輯 ]

irene_the_pooh

原帖由 Gloria0510 於 11-11-17 23:19 發表
去邊到上playgroup都唔緊要, 個個小朋友既發展同需知都唔同, 家長對playgroup老師既期望又唔同. 最緊要小朋友喜歡上, 家長又覺得岩小朋友就得.:)

當然！

但問題係：
1. 如果玩既野係屋企完住可以玩到既，點解要比千幾蚊呢？
2. 如果環境係唔理想既，點解要咁細既小朋友去冒險會有傳染病呢？
3. 如果教既野自己可以睇書學到既，點解唔自己睇書呢？
4. 如果教o個個都唔係好教到野既，點解要side左呢D family day既時間呢？

Gloria0510

去邊到上playgroup都唔緊要, 個個小朋友既發展同需知都唔同, 家長對playgroup老師既期望又唔同. 最緊要小朋友喜歡上, 家長又覺得岩小朋友就得.:)

lovebbsuper

真的是見仁見智了，我阿嫂、我、和我妹妹都喜歡他們的形式，或者可以說是較另類的。確是節奏慢，讓家長與孩子玩，甚至是陪他玩，讓他們有時間探索玩意，自己發現那遊戲的趣味，若孩子喜歡的，則給他們多些時間，也是有助培養專注力的。也許我們同意慢活，在實際生活，自己難以做到，對孩子，我們則不想催促了。他們對孩子說話的方法，是感染我的，聽着，也提醒了自己。妹妹是小學教師，對兒童成長理論有認識，她說那些筆記雖是簡單，但也溫故知新，提醒她不要用慣性的老師口脗與孩子說話，媽媽的角色不同於老師。
阿嫂去舊址，我和我妹妹去新地方，新地方較好。我見他們有做清潔，但可能我的要求不高。小女沒感染病，也就算可以了。

lala229

我係2年前上的, 外面仲裝修緊! 我認同幾位mami 的睇法...
1, 環境唔好 --- 細、頗污糟、舊。
2, 話叫做透過遊戲教你點同小朋友溝通，但真係玩多，佢唔係太多野教，唔知咁叫唔叫hea！( 佢地真係 "上堂時「間唔中」有人同你講幾句野囉！") 基本上係睇你同bb玩!
3, "放通心粉入小樽" e 個最深刻! 佢d 樽係飲完果汁先生的吉樽, 當你頭一次洗左..咁之後有冇洗? d 通心粉又有冇洗?? 我仔果時剛一歲, 想放入口食!

supermom1

教得好hea! <- agree

irene_the_pooh

我覺得對咁細既小朋友黎講軟硬件同樣重要，但佢既軟件都唔見得吸引！因為只要各位媽媽睇下書 (even只係睇下baby-mo呢類雜誌)，但已經識得佢教既遊戲玩法；至於玩時既教法 / 同小朋友既相處方法，同樣亦係一般「大路」既育兒書已經可以學到！

不過，唯一唔同既係，上堂時「間唔中」有人同你講幾句野囉！

tsangnamnam

內容普通, 新手而又少睇參考書可以一試.

但環境真係麻麻, 我試過喺地下見到條虫, 其實係我個女見到先. 好細條, 佢當時歲幾, 好彩佢叫我去睇...
唔知係咪因為污糟定外面裝修所以會有虫.
但個人覺得地方清潔係好重要!

rchchan0505

原帖由 2hands 於 11-11-12 02:05 發表
唔好! 教得好hea! 一個鐘玩3個遊戲, 要一班小朋友自己玩, 又唔清潔!

我去果時吾係叫小朋友自己玩ga wor, 係叫父母同bb玩ga wor，Dr. Poon 同 Auntie May 就會黎指教我地點樣用佢果套正向親子法同bb玩，有時我都會覺得一個咁簡單ga遊戲點同bb玩呀，但係佢地有辦法。吾係而家吾同哂嘛！

rchchan0505

我覺得好，因為我注重“軟件”多於“硬件”，我覺得獲益良多。
佢地ga班年齡差距只有2個月，d遊戲係fit到個bb ga發展階段。印象最深同最意外ga係，當囡囡快學行時，Dr. Poon就教bb學“mou”、學跌，真係好有用。吾知係咪我見識少，我覺得地方大，8個家庭一d都吾迫，我試過屋企附近果d，地方細好多。每次d玩具都有洗，呢樣我極之重視。Dr. Poon果度係好簡潔，話係想bb專心d，d玩具係好大眾化，話係想父母在家亦同bb玩，我真係每個星期可以係屋企同bb玩果幾個遊戲，呢d我都覺得係實際ga，不過就吾會好fanncy 囉。Playgroup真係有好多種，最緊要係知自己想要乜野。