You're really very resourceful! I can see that you've spent a lot of time and effort in analysing the data and share it in BK without bias. Your effort is much appreciated!
Hope to see your analysis about other schools in other threads too
原帖由 DGJS 於 11-3-7 12:23 發表
The reason why we have been emphasizing on the secondary because of this thread.
It is true that this section is for P.1 selection. Let's move on in another thread.
I have to say you are really good in sharing your comments with good reasons and analysis. I honestly appreciate and respect your contributions to this thread. MY HAT OFF TO YOU!
Hi All
As far as I know, there are around 20 pupils who will move to other primary schools (e.g. DGJS, MCS and HY) each year, while taking some pupils from other primary schools.
I am still keen to see more GH parents to share their first-hand information on GH Primary Section. Thanks!
btw .... yes.. may be we better focus more on primary school disucssion rather than secondary school discussion... sorry for that!
原帖由 DGJS 於 11-3-7 09:27 發表
AL result of the year 2009-2010 was comparatively bad. You guess it might be due to the fact that 2003-2004 was the first year of DSS. Then I checked and found that the first year of DSS was 2002-2003 ...
AL result of the year 2009-2010 was comparatively bad. You guess it might be due to the fact that 2003-2004 was the first year of DSS. Then I checked and found that the first year of DSS was 2002-2003. After the 2002-2003 students promoted to F.7, the AL result of them was good.
Anyway, my emphasis was not on the above. I always concern about the ~6% early exit rate per year. The school fee structure gives me some hint that Good Hope school management designs this kind of class structure. That is to say, the school allows ~6% of pupil to leave the school in each year in each form!
Other DSS famous schools (e.g. SPCC, DGS, DBS, St. Stephen) with stable of student do not have school fee varation.
原帖由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-6 22:37 發表
you mean public exam results of that year?
In 2002-2003, only F.1 students need to pay school fee, so it wouldn't affect the F.2-7 students
I mean if 2009-2010 was the 1st batch of DSS students ta ...
In 2002-2003, only F.1 students need to pay school fee, so it wouldn't affect the F.2-7 students
I mean if 2009-2010 was the 1st batch of DSS students taking AL exam..... sorry for the confusion made
btw, if the HKCEE results of this batch of students were not that bad (I haven't checked it), the poor uni entrance result of that year might be due to the fact that many good students left after F.5....
原帖由 DGJS 於 11-3-5 16:38 發表
The first year is 2002-2003. The result of this year's candidate was fine.
From the school fee structure, it seems that school management had defined a structure that no. of higher form students would be less than that of lower form.
原帖由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-4 20:13 發表
If that is the 1st year of turning to DSS, then it might be one of the reasons explaining the high exsit rate.
1. Parents are more well-off, then can afford sending their children to overseas.