Some kids need more structured, some do not
for those need more structured environment and learning they left as the teachers have not trained up to support the "unstructurede learning" which is more difficult to achieve, needs a lots of skills and educational philosophy.
Those teachers they themselves were trained in "traditional and structured model of education", how can they understand what is "unstreuctured but supportive learning"??
I have come to their interview and see the questionnaires they asked for parents. Not a very good questions and the seminars they held for the parents are not that really interesting..no special...
My nephew is studying WKF. He has been there for 5 years and is now in Grade 7. His parents are native Chinese but his English is excellent (including his accent) without attending any extra classes or tutorials. All subjects are taught in English except for Chinese and Liberal Arts. I am totally convinced that it is a good school and am also sending my child there in the upcoming year.
I think WKF is very different from TT. If you opt for traditional kind of education, TT is more suitable. If you want your child to study in a comparatively less stressful but well disciplined environment, WKF is a good choice.
原帖由 ha! 於 10-11-6 08:03 發表
What i know from BK forum before :
TT :There are two streams in TT, local stream and international stream. International stream is teaching in Eng and Mand, eng level is higher surely. Local stream ...
Yes, NET teachers but they are not necessarily 'blonde' hair type.
IS, computer, PE are taught in English.
Chi teachers do not speak Cantonese to students but speak Cantonese in parents day. Some of their mother - tongue language is Mandarin but some are not.