- 在線時間
- 428 小時
- 最後登錄
- 20-11-6
- 國民生產力
- 3
- 附加生產力
- 3457
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 10-9-13
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1104
- 主題
- 36
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 4564
- UID
- 658837
|
本帖最後由 bobbycheung 於 12-7-14 03:02 編輯
HKTHK 發表於 12-7-14 01:54
It doesn't feel right for me to judge a student's achievement on how much cost or effort was involve ...
Interesting. First of all, we have got to define what we are after. I am sure there are parents who do not put much weight on the IB result. As tingtingting said, she wants her son to be an IB35 Renaissance man than an IB45. It's a decision I respect. However, for others, the IB result is important if his son wants to get into a better university and/or doing the course he wants. If you are one of these parents, would you like your money be spent effectively on achieving this goal? If you spend a few million dollars more, would you like the school to use these sums to employ better teachers and get better facilities etc? If these teachers and facilities can't get you a point more than the school next door which has a lot less resources, shouldn't we ask why? Is it too much to expect perhaps a slightly better result? Of course, the students play a part in it as well. But in the case of ISF and CSS, I wouldn't say the calibre of CSS students in general are higher than that of ISF.
As to your 2nd question, if I spend all day studying but I still get the same point as another student who spends only one hour per day on it, shouldn't I ask why? Could it be something wrong with my approach or method?
As I said, I am commenting on the IB result alone. For those parents who have different priorities, my comments are probably irrelvent.
By the way, does any parent know how many ISF students took English A2?
|
|