- 在線時間
- 47 小時
- 最後登錄
- 19-9-25
- 國民生產力
- 3
- 附加生產力
- 195
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-3-29
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 80
- 主題
- 6
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 278
- UID
- 78234
 
|
Re: 購買歐洲鋼琴疑問
ming2, thanks again for the detail explanation. Please check PM.
ming2 寫道:
JJsMaMa
according to your questions..
1. In your opinion, is there a substantial difference between Sauter and Pleyel?....呢個要睇番彈琴0既人自己本身0既要求高唔高,聽唔聽得出/彈唔彈得出個分別啦...如果你問我,Pleyel同Sauter兩隻牌子0既比較,我幾年初次接觸一隻Sauter(不過唔記得係咩model,只知折完都要成十萬蚊),我就非常喜歡呢隻琴0既聲同埋touching,到去年我有個學生想換琴繼續學diploma grade時,佢問我意見,我介紹佢Sauter,佢話佢都好鐘意Sauter,不過價錢over budget,結果我地試完Pleyel都覺得唔錯,但係都唔及我早幾個月試0既個隻Sauter 130M (折完都要成十三四萬),個d聲同手感真係非一般0既upright呢...果然係一分錢就一分貨架...
2. Since pricing is similar between Pleyer and Boston, which one is of better value? ...Boston係designed by Steinway & Sons,所以有d Steinway 0既專利設計都會有用係Boston個琴度,所以如果講better value,我諗Boston會好少少啦..
3. Silly question may be. But, would you say that there is a direct correlation between the price tag and the quality amongst these European brands? Or does the "brand name" play a big part in pricing?....唔..當然有d琴0既質素同個價錢係有直接0既關係啦...就如我之前講過少少有關Steinway & Sons0既資料咁,當你知道Steinway0既製造過程同埋原理之後,你就會明白點一隻Steinway0既琴係會賣得咁貴,而你會覺得如果有錢你都會買佢架啦...不過有時係琴與琴之間作出比較時,你會發現同一個價錢入面,有d牌子0既質素係比另一d牌子好架...呢d亦都可以係同製造地區有關....就如我之前有提及過,同樣係十幾萬0既歐洲琴,柏斯個d就唔及tom lee個隻Sauter 130M好啦...另外"brand name"呢樣野,唔多唔少都會同pricing有d關係0既,正如我相信yamaha0既adv.點都好似比kawai多,所以yamaha 賣得比kawai貴都唔出奇架...
4. How does a 'good' Yamaha compare to these European brands?...呢個睇個人喜好啦..有人偏愛日本琴,但亦有人只係鐘意歐洲琴,好難有得比架.. |
|