GSIS - relocating?? - 國際學校


	686

2^#

發表於 09-3-16 17:37 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

popolung

別墅

Rank: 4


	686

3^#

發表於 09-3-16 21:09 |只看該作者

原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-3-16 17:37 發表
GSIS's Board plans to decant (not permanently relocating) middle and upper primary students to MOS for a few years for redevelopment of the Peak Campus. However, the plan was voted down by the parent ...

i see long posts in the Geokids forum, and the topic of GSIS is always on top, many parents complained. Some said even parents vote down, the GSIS board has approved already, and signed contract with the school in MOS (some said is RC, but wonder why RC still has space?). I can't verify in Geokids forum as it is down now.....


	686

4^#

發表於 09-3-16 21:57 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 2


	70

5^#

發表於 09-3-16 22:39 |只看該作者

So what does this mean? Who will compromise, the school or the parents? Are there any alternatives to this?

原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-3-16 21:57 發表
It is just rumour and GSIS hasn't signed any contract with RC nor with any school.

The information I provided is 100% correct. I am one of the parents who witnessed the EGM on last Friday and the vot ...


	686

6^#

發表於 09-3-16 22:54 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

popolung

別墅

Rank: 4


	686

7^#

發表於 09-3-17 02:15 |只看該作者

Good news to those who don't want their kids to move, but then it leave an question is, if the school don't renovate, how can it compete with other in the future?

Rank: 2


	70

8^#

發表於 09-3-17 07:06 |只看該作者

Does the school need to listen to the parents? Would they still move on to Ma On Shan regardless?

原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-3-16 21:57 發表
It is just rumour and GSIS hasn't signed any contract with RC nor with any school.

The information I provided is 100% correct. I am one of the parents who witnessed the EGM on last Friday and the vot ...

almom

複式洋房

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	385

9^#

發表於 09-3-17 09:14 |只看該作者

I think if you look at the issue at large, the school has the need of a larger campus.
However parents of course would not want their children to travel too far.
As someone outside GSIS, I think both sides have their merits.

BTW, for those who are interested, the RC rumours (ie, the rumours that GSIS will be using RC campus) were initiated by people with intention. They were in fact trying spread the impression that RC parents are paying all the fees and yet still have to share the campus with GSIS.

Looks like since all the admission procedures are now near the end, negative comments on RC are dying out too. Things like that happen all the time to many schools during admission time. I am so sorry to see that this time, they are using GSIS relocation plan this year as their weapon.


	686

10^#

發表於 09-3-17 11:38 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽


	686

11^#

發表於 09-3-17 11:42 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽


	686

12^#

發表於 09-3-17 11:52 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

tingtingting

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1929

13^#

發表於 09-3-17 12:18 |只看該作者

I don't for a second believe that GSIS will become less competitive as a result of the votes in the EGM. A better campus is nice to have, but not essential to GSIS's success.


	686

14^#

發表於 09-3-17 12:27 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 2


	70

15^#

發表於 09-3-17 17:21 |只看該作者

回覆 # 的文章

wisekid2007,

What is your view on this? Do you think the school will go ahead with the move?

almom

複式洋房

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	385

16^#

發表於 09-3-17 18:24 |只看該作者

原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-3-17 11:52 發表
Is it really true that the rumours were spread with intention?

Who will be so "無聊" to spread such rumours and why?

It is a pity that you have not changed a bit.


	686

17^#

發表於 09-3-18 13:27 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽


	686

18^#

發表於 09-3-18 14:00 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽