- 在線時間
- 742 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-2-20
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 17708
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 12-10-31
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 14632
- 主題
- 20
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 32340
- UID
- 1049305
   
|
引用:+本帖最後由+bobbycheung+於+15-9-5+10:29+
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 15-9-5 11:12 編輯
原帖由 bobbycheung 於 15-09-05 發表
本帖最後由 bobbycheung 於 15-9-5 10:41 編輯
Don't you get it? Telling individual cases are fine, with whatever information these cases might have. You telling cases of students asked by the school to leave are perfectly fine. Me telling cases of students very weak academically stayed in the school for many years. You accuse my cases being weak. That is fine. I won't manufacture something.
Drawing blanket statement or categorical statement like "中途如果你成績唔得, 會開聲叫你走." up front from whatever cases you might have is bound to be controversial. When you draw conclusions you should be prepared to demonstrate that your conclusion is reasonable based on the cases you have. The burden therefore is on whoever making blanket statements. I am not shifting burden, see?
You said
"中途如果你成績唔得, 會開聲叫你走."
Followed by "I only say things that I know for sure" is pretty blanket/categorical, whether you meant it or not.
"中途如果你成績唔得, (學校)會開聲叫你走"
Is a blanket conclusion/statement and is open to others who might what to know how you drew that conclusion.
"我認識(幾位/十幾位/一百位)中途成績唔得的學生, 學校開聲叫佢地走. " is fine as it is information, not a conclusion.
"中途如果你成績唔得, 學校好可能開聲叫你走" is a conclusion but it is not a blanket statement and I would probably not bothered to ask how you draw this conclusion.
Can you see the difference? Of course you don't.
You probably don't have further information to provide, I will stop right here.
 |
|