用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 備戰大學 請問各位有經驗家長選科問題: CHEM vs ECON ...
樓主: hotpot_lover
go

請問各位有經驗家長選科問題: CHEM vs ECON [複製鏈接]

Rank: 6Rank: 6


7529
21#
發表於 15-4-6 10:09 |只看該作者

回覆:MC1128 的帖子

是否要70分以上?



點評

MC1128  係呀,是參考建議,低於70分仍可揀   發表於 15-4-6 16:45

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1095
22#
發表於 15-4-6 13:48 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 DSS 於 15-4-6 13:49 編輯

睇番呢兩科舊年分數要求,似乎 Chem成績緊湊過Econ,如果目標係 level 4,Econ應該易啲。

Chem: 67 以上 - Level 4 ;  72 以上 - Level 5

Econ: 65.9 以上 - Level 4; 82.4 以上 - Level 5

Rank: 2


74
23#
發表於 15-4-7 00:34 |只看該作者
中學econ係文科,只要計好簡單既「百分變化」、「主項變換」、加減乘除。

Rank: 3Rank: 3


362
24#
發表於 15-4-7 10:40 |只看該作者

回覆:請問各位有經驗家長選科問題: CHEM vs ECON

Thanks咁多位意見
睇黎我要認真了解下chem 對數學要求先,呢樣好關鍵呢




2432
25#
發表於 15-4-7 12:15 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
簽名被屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1352
26#
發表於 15-4-7 20:52 |只看該作者
hotpot_lover 發表於 15-4-7 10:40
Thanks咁多位意見
睇黎我要認真了解下chem 對數學要求先,呢樣好關鍵呢



  ...
也該了解下bio對chem的要求,呢樣都好關鍵喔!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


350
27#
發表於 15-4-7 21:29 |只看該作者
If being weak at Mathematics ,
Chemistry should not be one of the DSE target-subject combination !

On the other hand  , most economic concept development is based upon mathematical approach and hence Economy is not suitable to those student
weak at mathematics !

The best option is History which would enhance those student  the standard of English simultaneously .

Conclusively , History is the best option for the third non-compulsory subject !

Rank: 3Rank: 3


350
28#
發表於 15-4-7 21:35 |只看該作者
If being weak at Mathematics ,
Chemistry should not be one of the DSE target-subject combination !

On the other hand  , most economic concept development is based upon mathematical approach and hence Economy is not suitable to those student
weak at mathematics !

The best option is History which would enhance those student  the standard of English simultaneously .

Conclusively , History is the best option for the third non-compulsory subject !

Rank: 3Rank: 3


350
29#
發表於 15-4-7 21:38 |只看該作者
If being weak at Mathematics ,
Chemistry should not be one of the DSE target-subject combination !

On the other hand  , most economic concept development is based upon mathematical approach and hence Economy is not suitable to those student
weak at mathematics !

The best option is History which would enhance those student  the standard of English simultaneously .

Conclusively , History is the best option for the third non-compulsory subject !

Rank: 3Rank: 3


149
30#
發表於 15-4-8 22:42 |只看該作者
我自己依家讀緊大學,高中時CHEM同ECON都有讀
個人認為ECON比較易讀,DSE LEVEL既數都只係加減乘除,上到大學先會用到STAT果D野
CHEM計數多過ECON,變化都多D,如果佢中3已經讀唔到店CHEM就唔好揀啦
中4會難好多,仲會有雪球效應,你唔識中4 D野就算中5好比心機都係事倍功半

Rank: 3Rank: 3


362
31#
發表於 15-4-9 10:17 |只看該作者
感謝各位意見, 非常有用
似乎數學唔好, 讀chem會係大挑戰

Rank: 3Rank: 3


362
32#
發表於 15-4-9 10:18 |只看該作者
我女唔肯讀history同中史
無辦法啦, 好現實, 老師好唔好直接影響上堂意欲

Rank: 3Rank: 3


350
33#
發表於 15-4-9 15:00 |只看該作者
The best option is Economy or History !

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1095
34#
發表於 15-4-9 15:25 |只看該作者

回覆:請問各位有經驗家長選科問題: CHEM vs ECON

如果中三化學冇超高分,讀上去可以爆發的機會唔大。因為果d periodic table知識對全科化學黎講簡單到暈



‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖