- 在線時間
- 893 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-9-4
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 10470
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 12-4-27
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1281
- 主題
- 2
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 11751
- UID
- 907557
|
Sorry to interrupt the discussion. However, I do have something to share.
According to my understanding, the "super subjects" of the universities in Hong Kong would admit the "best" students out of different cohorts.
For example, "medicine" usually admits the top 0.5% to 1.0% of DSE students. For the NJ applicants, they would usually admit the top 0.5% to 1.0% of the cohorts of your education system. If 43 points of IB in a certain year represents the top 1.0% of the cohort, the universities would admit IB students (through the NJ route) of 43 points or above. Basically, it is fair for JUPAS applicants and NJ applicants to compete the spots of the "super subjects". Of course, there are exceptional cases but the number should be small.
I have friends whose daughters respectively obtains 41 IB points this year and 7 AP fives plus SAT 2,250 this year plus 4 SAT II subjects (ranging from 780 to 800). The IB applicant applied for admission of law of CU and HKU. The AP applicant applied for admission to medicine CU and HKU.
The end result is that the AP applicant received no offers and the IB applicant only received an offer from CU for law.
So it is quite clear that it is no easy for NJ students to be admitted to the "super subjects" in Hong Kong through the NJ route. You have to be the top 0.5% to 1.0% percent of your cohort in order to be competitive with the JUPAS students. In my opinion, it is incorrect to say that NJ students (e.g. IB students) are relatively easy to be admitted by the universities to their "super subjects".
The IB applicant eventually settles in a top college in London for law and the AP applicant eventually attends an Ivy college. |
|