- 在線時間
- 54 小時
- 最後登錄
- 12-6-15
- 國民生產力
- 83
- 附加生產力
- 6
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 04-8-23
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 2235
- 主題
- 31
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 2324
- UID
- 29187
|
Re: 各位給Dr.T的pm
All I can say is when Glenn Doman started writing his original books, very little about autism was known. As far as I know autism is not considered to be a "brain-injury."
I found the following information from the The National Research Center on Learning Disabilities website (http://nrcld.org/index.html), which "engages in research, develops recommendations, and provides training to help administrators, teachers, parents, and policy makers address the complex issues surrounding the proper identification of students with learning disabilities who need special education services."
"Glen Doman, a physical therapist, founded the Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1955. He along with Carl Delacato, an educational psychologist, developed a controversial approach to treating children with brain injury.13 Their program of "neurological organization" was based on three assumptions: (a) the development of the individual, ontogeny, recapitulates the development of the species, phylogeny; (b) children with brain injury need to be trained to have cerebral dominance; and (c) training procedures need to change the brain itself, not just symptoms (Delacato, 1959, 1963, 1966).
The Doman-Delacato program enjoyed considerable popularity for a time, but it eventually met with overwhelming criticism from the field (Robbins & Glass, 1969). In 1968, a number of professional organizations14 issued a statement criticizing the Institutes on four major points: (a) the promotional methods placed parents in an awkward position if they decided against using the treatment; (b) the training regimens were very demanding, which might cause parents to neglect other family needs and restrict the child from engaging in age-appropriate normal activities; (c) the claims for success were not backed up by credible research; and (d) the theoretical foundation of the methods were questionable."
|
|