- 在線時間
- 742 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-2-20
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 17708
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 12-10-31
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 14632
- 主題
- 20
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 32340
- UID
- 1049305
|
carriebaby111 發表於 13-9-14 22:42
始終又不能夠一概而論,先不說傳統書本(這個根本沒有得比)就以大家都是電子產品來比較,無論電腦好,kind ...
見聞上,無可否認確是有它的優點,好像介紹動物,太陽系等等,可以附加聲音和圖像功能,可增加孩子的印象和記憶,又可有上網功能,找查資料時,方便很多,所以對小孩而言應該是正面的。
我想家長們煩惱仔女的上網問題,不是因為他們在網上學習,而是沉迷網上玩樂
xxxx
No, I think lively, interactive learning does not have to be iPAD, or even computer. Low tech stuff like, drawings, children making funny noises, pictures shown in the class room, show and tell, etc are incredible lively and interactive teaching, more so than iPAD or computers. With iPAD, they play with a program. Without an iPAD, they interact with classmates and teachers. Which one is better for primary students? I know the answer.
Like I said, why do we want to use one hi tech device to replace printed books, pop-up books, dictionary, teachers, classmates.
|
|