- 在線時間
- 228 小時
- 最後登錄
- 16-9-14
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 1202
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-11-3
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 197
- 主題
- 1
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 1399
- UID
- 109078
|
I apologize if I give that impression to you. Perhaps I should wait until the last interview date of this Sat. But even if I ask after this Sat, it can also be said that I spread rumours to deter successful kids from taking offers. And if I ask that after the deadline for accepting offer, it can then be said that I spread remours in order that competitors wouldn't be applying in the coming year. So, conspriacy theory seems always work. But what I don't understand why saying "not having distinct edge" is spreading rumours. I chose "distinct edge" consciously. Other parents would quote figures and why can't one accept that even for first tier school, not all graduates are top one. Choosing CCKG needs to give up kids' own K1, by which we have to give up the chance of going to their associated primary schools. Not all kids are so fortunate in going to DG or DB at the end, so why can't it be a legitimate concern to ask what happen to those who can't succeed in going to DG or DB?! |
|