- 在線時間
- 1504 小時
- 最後登錄
- 20-9-15
- 國民生產力
- 8831
- 附加生產力
- 33165
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 08-11-1
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 4484
- 主題
- 167
- 精華
- 1
- 積分
- 46480
- UID
- 226763
|
Honestly, the past 10 years should be the nightmare of all primary schools in Hong Kong, because of the prolonged period of low birth rates.
So, it changes everything in the environment and also the different policies by the EDB changes the mix of schools, particularly with the addition of Direct Subsidized schools.
Anyway, I believe there are few facts that happened (1) with the low birth rates, actually children have enjoyed higher chances to be admitted to gov't or gov't aided schools thru allocation so they are given more options; (2) the SLS primary section has changed to whole-day a number of years ago but with the limited classrooms, less seats are available and also make it less attractive; (3) demand to SLS (secondary) may have lowered as C&W district is actually a very special district, besides 2 band 3 schools, all others are band 1 schools. So with decrease in birth rate, it may pushes some band 2 students into some band 1 schools.
Just my observations thru these years. Hope it can help for better understanding.
A little information to share. Although the students entering S1 may not be the best group, however, over these years, the students graduating from the secondary school has achieved the highest improvement rating (compare to other C&W district schools) after their 5 years of study in SLS.
原帖由 Isaacmommy 於 10-11-9 13:30 發表
Can anyone share the present standard of St Louis? I know that SL used to be a very good school in the 80s. I've got 2 friends (now in their late 40s) who graduated from this school. They subsequently ...
[ 本帖最後由 iantsang 於 10-11-10 13:49 編輯 ] |
|