資優可不可以訓練?

Gisele

Dr. T

A friend of mine would like to have a copy - she cannot access BK on her Mackintosh Computer.

Please send it to:

[email protected]


thanks

Dr.T 寫道:
已scan了3篇早前寫落有關閃咭及光碟學習的文章,如有興趣的網友請pm你的email給我...由於file頗大(7M+),請先確定自己的信箱裝得落 Hotmail一定爆...

cltm

我想要一個 copy 參考, 請email 比我, thanks

[email protected]

Dr.T 寫道:
已scan了3篇早前寫落有關閃咭及光碟學習的文章,如有興趣的網友請pm你的email給我...由於file頗大(7M+),請先確定自己的信箱裝得落 Hotmail一定爆...

由於文章有版權(當然唔係我自己嘅, 如果係嘅話大家隨便複印無問題),所以在此聲明僅供大家參考之用...

[quote]
beesbees 寫道:
...不如你揾人幫你整晒上你個網頁, 以餐一眾飢民+fans.

[/quote]

David媽

Dr. T
I want the copy too ,pls send to the following address. Thanks
[email protected]
  

Dr.T

寄出後收到以下訊息...請check一check:

"-The following addresses had delivery problems-
<[email protected]>   (No delivery mechanism available.)"

David媽 寫道:
I want the copy too ,pls send to the following address. Thanks
[email protected]
  

suz

Dr. T:  please send to [email protected].  tks.

David媽

DR. T
Sorry, 咁麻煩你試下呢個
[email protected]

Davidma

Dr.T 寫道:
寄出後收到以下訊息...請check一check:

"-The following addresses had delivery problems-
<[email protected]>   (No delivery mechanism available.)"

[quote]
David媽 寫道:
I want the copy too ,pls send to the following address. Thanks
[email protected]
  

[/quote]

David媽

DR. T
收到資料, 唔該哂

Martin媽咪

我想要一個 copy 參考, 請email 比我, thanks

e-mail address : [email protected]     

palmchristy

在香港未必有太多人有機會知道 "How to Multiply your baby's Intelligence Course (for well children)" 這個由Glenn Doman辦的課程. 不少人在實行他的方法教導孩子前, 可能連<如何教寶寶閱讀>這本書也未有機會看過, 只靠有限的資料或一些課程的介紹便去實行. 由於對這個方法的理念了解有限, 加上方法對家長的要求很高, 結果出現了兩個情況: (1)家長十分著重孩子認字的進度或(2)家長因種種原因放棄. 結果令一些朋友對這個方法有不少負面評價, 實在令人感到氣餒.

Glenn Doman/Janet Doman經常在IAHP網站強調對方法有正確認知才實行的重要性. 有興趣的朋友可以看一看其網站內的一編文章: Lovers, Attackers and Counterfeiters.

我沒有機會上過"How to Multiply your baby's Intelligence Course (for well children)" 的課程, 也沒有興趣上一些聲稱有關但不是Glenn Doman認可的課程, 但我有機會看完Glenn Doman/Janet Doman出版的相關6本書, 並斷斷續續的實行其方法兩年多. 這個不太完整的堅持顯然對我女兒的認知, 閱讀能力及興趣, 以及語言能力等有不少幫助. 而我對方法的有限了解及實踐, 令我很認同上述文章裡的一句話: Inevitably, techniques that are applied without a complete understanding of principle and philosophy do not work.

所以, 我認為對這個方法有興趣的朋友, 無論如何至少要找<如何教寶寶閱讀>這本書看一看, 對書中的方法有基本認識及了解, 才好去依樣開始教寶寶閱讀.

資優可不可以訓練, 我不敢下什麼判斷. 但只要家長認真了解你的孩子, 再配合合理的早期教育, 對孩子的各方面發展必定會有幫助.

SLI 寫道:
Dear Dr. T , twokidsmum and 睡覺 ,

As I personally know Dr. Glenn Doman ( and his family ) , who is the founder of flashing method for words and dots ( for maths ) , and I've met in person with so many kids that are trained with such methods, it's no need for any more research report or doubt for me to believe that the method works !!

Although the method is pretty old ( ~ 50 years ) , it still keeps training up so many talented kids worldwide , esp. in USA , Japan , Taiwan, Singapore , Malaysia , HK and even in PRC.  There are 2 pioneer experts in this field, namely Dr. Glenn Doman ( www.iahp.org ) and Dr. Makato Shichida  ( www.shichida.org.jp ) .

With thousands of proven cases (gifted kids trained up with this method, I've met quite a no. of them ), I don't think any research report is necessary. By the way, how can you rationalize and generalize such a research with such diversity , such as differences in races , cultural and educational backgrounds of parents, genetics , nuturing environment etc. ? Or is it moral or ethical to put infants for such research , one group being trained and another without training or stimulation ?

I firmly believe that the method works , it even helps Glenn Doman's 2 grandsons to graduate from university with bachelor degree at just age 17 ! They're gentle, knowledgable and love to read and play violin , aren't them the dream of parents that come true !

I've used the method to teach my own son since birth , the effect is so astounishing as compared with kids of similiar age. Now he is 2 and can speak in complete bilingual sentences , physically strong and fit , can read independently , curious about the world with lots of 'why' questions . I recalled the old saying from Wu Xi (胡適) : You get what you nuture .

I'm not buffing or boasting for my own son, I just want to share my own experience and knowing . Science can't solve all the human issues ; and scientific methods are not very helpful  for subjects that due with humans or human experiences  , such as training, education, economics , sensations, religions and politics .

SLI    

ellan

Hi, Dr. T,

請pm給我有關的發表文章, 謝意

Dr.T 寫道:
已scan了3篇早前寫落有關閃咭及光碟學習的文章,如有興趣的網友請pm你的email給我...由於file頗大(7M+),請先確定自己的信箱裝得落 Hotmail一定爆...

由於文章有版權(當然唔係我自己嘅, 如果係嘅話大家隨便複印無問題),所以在此聲明僅供大家參考之用...

[quote]
beesbees 寫道:
...不如你揾人幫你整晒上你個網頁, 以餐一眾飢民+fans.

[/quote]

alady

Dr. T,

What is the population in Hong Kong for a gifted child?  What is your comment for a child whose IQ is close to 130?

Thanks,

Dr.T 寫道:
寄出後收到以下訊息...請check一check:

"-The following addresses had delivery problems-
<[email protected]>   (No delivery mechanism available.)"

[quote]
David媽 寫道:
I want the copy too ,pls send to the following address. Thanks
[email protected]
  

[/quote]

Dr.T

因是pdf檔案,只可email,無法pm.

ellan 寫道:
請pm給我有關的發表文章, 謝意

Dr.T

1. 3-4%

2. 單從總分是沒法知道小朋友的強弱項在那裡,因為內在分數分佈絕對影響孩子表現(指"韋氏"-"雷文氏"則只會給予一個評級,談不上分析)

alady 寫道:
1.What is the population in Hong Kong for a gifted child?
2.What is your comment for a child whose IQ is close to 130?

YeeOnMama

Hi, Dr. T,

請e-mail 給我有關的發表文章, [email protected]

非常感激!

ellan

Dear Dr. T

對不起, 我的e-mail是 [email protected], 煩請e給我有關文章, 再謝.

Dr.T 寫道:
因是pdf檔案,只可email,無法pm.

[quote]
ellan 寫道:
請pm給我有關的發表文章, 謝意

[/quote]

ellan

謝謝Dr. T, 文章已收妥, 感激  

Phantom

DrT

我是新入離看到這個題目。我想請問在香港小孩的智力評估一般是多少呢？

Dr.T 寫道:
1. 3-4%

2. 單從總分是沒法知道小朋友的強弱項在那裡,因為內在分數分佈絕對影響孩子表現(指"韋氏"-"雷文氏"則只會給予一個評級,談不上分析)

[quote]
alady 寫道:
1.What is the population in Hong Kong for a gifted child?
2.What is your comment for a child whose IQ is close to 130?

[/quote]

Dr.T

理論上六成多的人是智商(IQ)90-109...雖然有人(通常只是人云亦云)認為現時很多小朋友似乎比以往的一代聰明,但可惜我的臨床經驗是普通表現佔大多數,尤其是當我在學校內工作時這情況更明顯.

但正如我不斷地強調,總分實在不是最重要(除非是頗差[<90]或是極好[>140),反而孩子在分部測驗內(指韋氏)的分數分佈更有啟發性.

所以有網友問我"1xx分的孩子表現會如何"這類問題是很難有實質的答案. 因為從總分只能約略估計小朋友的資質,但強弱項如何實無法從單單一個分數得知.

Phantom 寫道:
我是新入離看到這個題目。我想請問在香港小孩的智力評估一般是多少呢？

Phantom

Dr. T,

Dr. T,

我想再問一問，我有兩個孩子，姐姐之前亦做過智力評估，評估結果是127。那樣，姊姊屬於怎樣的孩子？報告籠統說她介乎於優異與超乎優異，屬於一個學習能力強的孩子。咁之後又如何呢？
她的弟弟現在六歲，弟弟平日行為表現大概是思考速度快、創作力豐富，語文能力不差，但記憶力不太好。那麼弟弟會否有類似姊姊的智商呢？智商會否有遺傳的關係呢？另外，我想問問做了這個智力評估後對小朋友究竟有甚麼用處？弟弟值不值得也去做智力評估呢？請指點？
謝謝！

Dr.T 寫道:
理論上六成多的人是智商(IQ)90-109...雖然有人(通常只是人云亦云)認為現時很多小朋友似乎比以往的一代聰明,但可惜我的臨床經驗是普通表現佔大多數,尤其是當我在學校內工作時這情況更明顯.

但正如我不斷地強調,總分實在不是最重要(除非是頗差[<90]或是極好[>140),反而孩子在分部測驗內(指韋氏)的分數分佈更有啟發性.

所以有網友問我"1xx分的孩子表現會如何"這類問題是很難有實質的答案. 因為從總分只能約略估計小朋友的資質,但強弱項如何實無法從單單一個分數得知.

[quote]
Phantom 寫道:
我是新入離看到這個題目。我想請問在香港小孩的智力評估一般是多少呢？

[/quote]

Dr.T

1. 再三強調要分析分部測驗才可知道小朋友強弱項,從總分是看不出日後培訓的重點-負責評估小朋友那位心理學家應該向你解釋清楚.

2. 沒有見過及測試過無法得知小朋友能力如何.但只要那位評估人員能夠詳細向你解釋分數背後的含意,無論最終分數如何也是值得的(但肯定為姐姐做測試那位做不到這點...)

至於有否遺傳...我只可以說我見過不少兄弟姊妹間智能表現完全南轅北轍的例子,但亦有一門數天才的個案.

其他問題可參考我另一個題目一直以來的討論...
>>Dr.T speaking...

Phantom 寫道:
1...評估結果是127。那樣，姊姊屬於怎樣的孩子？...
2...她的弟弟現...會否有類似姊姊的智商呢？智商會否有遺傳的關係呢？另外，我想問問做了這個智力評估後對小朋友究竟有甚麼用處？弟弟值不值得也去做智力評估呢？請指點？