- 在線時間
- 97 小時
- 最後登錄
- 21-2-3
- 國民生產力
- 24
- 附加生產力
- 1358
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 09-9-17
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 281
- 主題
- 13
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 1663
- UID
- 542375
|
Band5 發表於 15-12-16 20:03
我見好多人都要睇有冇得全in嚟決定報邊間,其實我覺得根本上係冇分別。試用QC做例子:
QC先以教署排名揀20 ... The following assessment criteria are quoted from QC's website:
本校將於2016年1月向教育局呈交中一自行分配學位申請者之名單。校方會根據各申請者在學業成績(佔評分50%)、操行(佔評分5%)及課外活動(佔評分15%)三方面的表現,安排約二百名申請者參加面試,面試將考核申請者的中英文語文能力、溝通能力及常識(佔評分30%)。
So the weighting for rank order vs interview performance is 50% vs 30%. Interviews still play a vital part in the selection process. Maybe QC doesn't want bookworm type of high achievers but rather all-round students. In fact, all-round students are welcome everywhere, aren't they?
|
|