用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 小學讀私校,定還是留d錢比小朋友將來去外國讀書? ...
樓主: Nicnana
go

小學讀私校,定還是留d錢比小朋友將來去外國讀書? [複製鏈接]

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10


25420
21#
發表於 15-3-8 13:10 |只看該作者

引用:讀任何學校,不保証—定將來不去外國讀書,

本帖最後由 siden 於 15-3-8 13:11 編輯
原帖由 brother4 於 15-03-08 發表
讀任何學校,不保証—定將來不去外國讀書,DSE現中文及通識又可能孩子將來想做律師/醫師,香港u學 ...

律師我唔知。睇怕至多英國得。USA/澳洲law畢業回港唔承認掛。

醫生嗎。

在外國畢業個試香港唔承認的。要另外再考試。而且唔易考。

咁你由得細路以後唔番香港在海外行醫咪得攞。




1945
22#
發表於 15-3-8 13:13 |只看該作者

回覆:小學讀私校,定還是留d錢比小朋友將來去外國讀書?

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


1945
23#
發表於 15-3-8 13:14 |只看該作者

回覆:小學讀私校,定還是留d錢比小朋友將來去外國讀書?

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


1945
24#
發表於 15-3-8 13:26 |只看該作者

回覆:小學讀私校,定還是留d錢比小朋友將來去外國讀書?

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


1945
25#
發表於 15-3-8 13:32 |只看該作者

回覆:小學讀私校,定還是留d錢比小朋友將來去外國讀書?

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


20786
26#
發表於 15-3-8 13:38 |只看該作者

回覆:siden 的帖子

律師及醫師可通過考試,就有牌,好彩孩子冇能力及心願做,有外國讀書有香港獎學金/學校獎學金申請。



Rank: 3Rank: 3


157
27#
發表於 15-3-8 13:39 |只看該作者

引用:睇吓邊間私小,邊間官津,重要係是否適合小

原帖由 HMmummy 於 15-03-07 發表
睇吓邊間私小,邊間官津,重要係是否適合小朋友?
如果新油天官校和SFA私立呢?




1945
28#
發表於 15-3-8 13:41 |只看該作者

引用:+本帖最後由+siden+於+15-3-8+13:11+編輯+\

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10


25420
29#
發表於 15-3-8 14:14 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:原帖由+siden+於+15-03-08+發表本帖

本帖最後由 siden 於 15-3-8 14:20 編輯
原帖由 belle2009 於 15-03-08 發表
這些香港的医科後補試不難考,有朋友也曾英國讀医,現在香港執業多年。
但在Canada要係Canadian citizen才 ...

Passing rate 唔過2成!

唔難???






55260
30#
發表於 15-3-8 14:17 |只看該作者
mamacare123 發表於 15-3-8 13:39
如果新油天官校和SFA私立呢?
SFA ~~~~


1945
31#
發表於 15-3-8 14:17 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:原帖由+belle2009+於+15-03-08+發表

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10


25420
32#
發表於 15-3-8 14:22 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:原帖由+siden+於+15-03-08+發表Passi

原帖由 belle2009 於 15-03-08 發表
我識的朋友全部passed.....many years ago should be more difficult
你自己睇:


Foreign doctors' test 'too tough'

ELLA LEE [email protected]

PUBLISHED : Monday, 08 August, 2011, 12:00am

UPDATED : Monday, 08 August, 2011, 12:00am

Fewer than 10 per cent of foreign doctors who sit the Hong Kong Medical Council examination go on to get a licence, raising concerns that the local medical profession is putting up barriers to fend off competition.

The concerns have prompted the head of the council's licentiate committee, Dr Cheung Hon-ming, to call for a review of the test, which he says is 'too difficult'.

But the city's medical association rejected claims the test was a barrier to foreign doctors, saying Hong Kong has a very free market.

Cheung said the pass rate for the exam dropped from an average 15 per cent between 1977 and 1996, to 8.9 per cent between 1996 and 2009. In 2008, only nine out of 138 people who sat the exam got licences. There were 12 out of 158 in 2009.

'The very low pass rate shows that the standards for the examination could be too high,' he said.

'Some overseas doctors, including those with specialist qualifications, have failed. We need a review.'

Overseas and mainland doctors who want to practise in Hong Kong have to pass the exam to get a licence and qualify for an internship.

But graduates from the city's two medical schools - at the University of Hong Kong and Chinese University - do not have to sit the test.

They can start a 12-month internship immediately after passing the schools' internal exams.

The Medical Council says the standard of the universal examination is comparable to the local medical schools' internal tests.

Before the handover in 1997, doctors from commonwealth countries were exempted from the exam. But the exemption was lifted after the handover.

Cheung said there should be one licensing examination for all, including local medical students.

He said that while the medical schools' examinations mostly covered the final year's curriculum, the council's examination covered almost all subjects in a five-year medical course.

Candidates can only sit the examination five times, a rule Cheung said should be lifted. 'Why don't we give more opportunities to people who want to keep trying?'

Cheung, who trained in Guangzhou, is also president of the Association of Licentiates of the Medical Council, formed by about 500 doctors who passed the licensing exam to practise in Hong Kong.

Hong Kong Medical Association president Dr Choi Kin agreed it would be better if all doctors, including local medical students, sat the same exam.

'That can at least make the system look fairer to all and stop all the argument,' Choi said.

But Choi rejected claims that the council examination was a obstacle to foreign doctors.

He said Hong Kong doctors from all over the world could sit the test and practise here if they passed. In contrast, some countries only allowed people with residency to sit licensing tests.

The annual examination has three parts: written papers on professional knowledge, a test of proficiency in medical English and an assessment of clinical skills.

The syllabus and the examination papers are prepared by the Medical Council's examination sub-committee, comprising academics from the two medical schools.

'To ensure that the level of the licensing examination is comparable to the examinations of the local medical schools, the examiners are requested and required to make reference to the questions used in the examinations of the local undergraduates,' a council spokesman said.

The council said that apart from the local examiners, four overseas examiners were invited to oversee the conduct of the clinical assessments. They gave comments and feedback on the examination. But the 'syllabus' of the examination only lists the subjects covered and does not give details of content.

One university doctor who practises in Hong Kong with limited registration - referring to doctors hired by universities who do not have to take the licensing examination - said the council exam was a 'political examination' instead of about standards.

He questioned why the final exams for the two local medical schools had a pass rate of over 90 per cent, nine times the success rate for candidates sitting the council's tests.

'Are the exams comparable? The views I am given is that they are not,' the doctor said.

154

The number of foreign doctors registered with the Medical Council under limited registrations as of the end of June






1945
33#
發表於 15-3-8 14:24 |只看該作者

回覆:小學讀私校,定還是留d錢比小朋友將來去外國讀書?

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


1945
34#
發表於 15-3-8 14:27 |只看該作者

回覆:小學讀私校,定還是留d錢比小朋友將來去外國讀書?

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10


25420
35#
發表於 15-3-8 14:29 |只看該作者

引用:其實是否包括好多大陸來的医生? +

原帖由 belle2009 於 15-03-08 發表
其實是否包括好多大陸來的医生?
我點知。

但同容易沾不上邊吧。

你自己都估到, pass得咁少,唔係大陸落黎都唔慌易啦。



Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


20786
36#
發表於 15-3-8 14:31 |只看該作者

回覆:小學讀私校,定還是留d錢比小朋友將來去外國讀書?

我只想有開心愉快學習,更何況讀書叻不保証將來生活好




1945
37#
發表於 15-3-8 14:32 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:原帖由+belle2009+於+15-03-08+發表

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10


25420
38#
發表於 15-3-8 14:33 |只看該作者

回覆:小學讀私校,定還是留d錢比小朋友將來去外國讀書?

依家好多國家冇以前咁筍,就算外國U grad, 都要揾到工再住滿?N年至有機會入藉。我都唔清楚。

要揾專家前輩答。




1945
39#
發表於 15-3-8 14:34 |只看該作者

回覆:小學讀私校,定還是留d錢比小朋友將來去外國讀書?

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


1945
40#
發表於 15-3-8 14:37 |只看該作者

回覆:小學讀私校,定還是留d錢比小朋友將來去外國讀書?

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
‹ 上一主題|下一主題