用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 香港的直資私立學校會否超英趕美?
查看: 2498|回覆: 60
go

香港的直資私立學校會否超英趕美? [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
1#
發表於 12-10-15 16:12 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印
有報導有名人透過中介人捐款哈佛但仔女不獲取錄而怒告對方。香港既直资私校同時有收生自主權和接受捐款,會不會早晚淪落到此地步?
   0    0    0    0

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3727
2#
發表於 12-10-15 16:31 |只看該作者
印象中十幾年前有中學有教師因此坐監,但忘記那一間。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3727
3#
發表於 12-10-15 16:41 |只看該作者
http://www.singtao.com/archive/f ... ord1=&keyword2= 原來是津校拔小。

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

醒目開學勳章 王國長老


58839
4#
發表於 12-10-15 16:46 |只看該作者
唔好話我陰謀論, 我相信其實不嬲都發生緊, 不過我地呢D小市民唔知姐

點評

carolmum  agreed!!!!  發表於 12-10-15 16:47

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6556
5#
發表於 12-10-15 16:53 |只看該作者
當然有啦!我身邊的人都有發生過…有人介紹再做donation,半年後插班入學...不過應唔會好多掛…


538
6#
發表於 12-10-15 16:56 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
7#
發表於 12-10-15 17:22 |只看該作者
sheffield 發表於 12-10-15 16:53
當然有啦!我身邊的人都有發生過…有人介紹再做donation,半年後插班入學...不過應唔會好多掛… ...
希望不會是官津校吧?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
8#
發表於 12-10-15 17:28 |只看該作者
hophopbunny 發表於 12-10-15 16:56
美國那case是告個consultant,根本沒有捐獻比學校wor

捐獻比學校從來全世界都有,點淪落法?我有留意樓主 ...
我諗你係性本善論和理想主意者。我只相信機制和誘因,有不完善既機制和誘因,這種事情終歸會發生,時間既問題。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2670
9#
發表於 12-10-15 17:30 |只看該作者

回覆:lawsonmoon 的帖子

大陸化之後應該會更嚴重。




538
10#
發表於 12-10-15 17:32 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
11#
發表於 12-10-15 19:07 |只看該作者
hophopbunny 發表於 12-10-15 17:32
津校都可以捐獻wor,你捐比鮮魚行都得。

多謝樓主讚美!
我都係講緊捐款入學尼D不道德行為。行賄是犯法,已有機制嚴懲,冇乜好講。
津校可自主收生既位很少很少,也冇乜好講吧!

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6556
12#
發表於 12-10-15 22:37 |只看該作者
回復 lawsonmoon 的帖子

不,是私校。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
13#
發表於 12-10-16 14:30 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 12-10-16 14:45 編輯
hophopbunny 發表於 12-10-15 17:32
津校都可以捐獻wor,你捐比鮮魚行都得。

多謝樓主讚美!

君不見spcc和DGJS小一申請已收集一些常人覺得同收生冇必要收集既資料(要申請人提供正本水電媒單供核對所申報住址);你試吓問他們資料有何用途?點解唔收生後才要求核對?
Why 其他學校包括男拔不會核對申報既地址,你鐘意報山頂又得,劏房又得?誠實對自己既都會有個答案。

點評

QQLAU  會不會想多左?有人住公屋都一樣可以考到spcc.  發表於 12-10-17 00:26

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6556
14#
發表於 12-10-16 14:53 |只看該作者
其實呢樣野都好普通…名門望族的小朋友們都在明校讀,係咪真係個個出自名門的小朋友都係咁叻,經過一輪interview之後擊敗其他對手入讀名校呢?!再者,sponsorship對學校來說是非常重要…學校是社會的縮影,每個人/學生都有其功能…咁講有點灰,但好現實…

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
15#
發表於 12-10-16 15:13 |只看該作者
sheffield 發表於 12-10-16 14:53
其實呢樣野都好普通…名門望族的小朋友們都在明校讀,係咪真係個個出自名門的小朋友都係咁叻,經過一輪inte ...
所以盡管冇機會受惠,我仍然非常非常欣賞那些已經是名校,但仍拒絶轉私校直資既辦學團體!such as la salle, wah yan, marymount, maryknoll, st mary etc. 排名不分先後。

點評

SCKnight  St Joseph都係!  發表於 12-10-17 22:48

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3101
16#
發表於 12-10-16 15:18 |只看該作者
lawsonmoon 發表於 12-10-16 15:13
所以盡管冇機會受惠,我仍然非常非常欣賞那些已經是名校,但仍拒絶轉私校直資既辦學團體!such as la salle,  ...

One of the reasons for those tranditional schools do not want to change to DSS or private school is that they have no sufficient fund to maintain their campuse.  MCS is one of those.  For subsidy school, they can apply funding from the Government to maintain the campus.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
17#
發表於 12-10-16 15:32 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 12-10-17 14:10 編輯
chunyatmama 發表於 12-10-16 15:18
One of the reasons for those tranditional schools do not want to change to DSS or private school is ...

you really think that is a reason!? dbs is charging about $4k per month. you really think that all the schools i mentioned above cannot take enough students if they change to dss and charge $4k per month!? you know a whole bunch of parents are paying over $4k per month just for eca!
then you tell me why XXX can while la salle cannot if that is the reason? why YYY can while st mary cannot?

點評

SCKnight  I will be the one parent willing to pay....  發表於 12-10-17 22:49

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3101
18#
發表於 12-10-16 15:50 |只看該作者
lawsonmoon 發表於 12-10-16 15:32
you really think that is a reason!? dbs is charging about $4k per month. you really think that all  ...
Relax.  That is ONE of the reasons and that's real.

I believe most if not all the Cathelic schools do not switch to DSS or private schoosl are influenced by the Church.  You agree or not, that's one of the reasons.  To change or not to change is not just click to do it.  When eveyone concentrate on gaining money, you have to see various sides as well.  Besides, $4K or even $7K per month as mentioned by you, to some people is huge some per month while some think its value for money.  Besides, all DSS are required to provide financial aid to those students in need so that less well off students can still enjoy a "fair" opportunities.

Originally, wanna talk about the other famous subsidy school, but I strike them all out.  I do not want to be quoted.  


Rank: 4


838
19#
發表於 12-10-16 22:34 |只看該作者

回覆:lawsonmoon 的帖子

I don't want people to involve my Alma Mater in their argument.
Good Hope changed to DSS because the primary section is private and EDB said that we could take in our own primary students only if both sections were of the same mode, so Secondary has to be half private.



Rank: 5Rank: 5


2094
20#
發表於 12-10-17 00:06 |只看該作者
GHcat 發表於 12-10-16 22:34
I don't want people to involve my Alma Mater in their argument.
Good Hope changed to DSS because the ...
it`s funny what make you feel that people need to follow your "instruction". btw, we are mainly talking about primary schools here, you should have told us why good hope primary changed to private school on day one.
‹ 上一主題|下一主題