救恩派位理想嗎?

im_csb

看過website's record, 救恩派位好似派位不太理想
是因為程度比其他中西區低一點嗎?

tattc

原帖由 im_csb 於 11-10-27 23:40 發表
看過website's record, 救恩派位好似派位不太理想
是因為程度比其他中西區低一點嗎?

唔好意思，我真心想問下，派去邊幾間先叫理想？

im_csb

係喎...意思係幾多派band 1 , band 2 !

ngsmum

Why do you think it is 不太理想?

nearly 80% go to EMI schools; 86% got first choice.  

I think this is exceptional!

Or maybe the key is you think its linked secondary school is not famous enough?

joeyxlma

原帖由 ngsmum 於 11-10-28 19:35 發表
Why do you think it is 不太理想?

nearly 80% go to EMI schools; 86% got first choice.  

I think this is exceptional!

Or maybe the key is you think its linked secondary school is not famous enough? ...

It depends... I have do the counting but I think 80% is fair, not too low but not exceptional good, especial in that district.

joeyxlma

But I think those with exceptionally good allocation results are tyically those renewal as very "harsh", not only in term of the amount of homeword, also in term of the atmosphere in the school.  Also the school policy may not be nice especially to whose academic results is not outstanding.

It really depends on the choice of the parents which type of education do you prefer.

im_csb

I understand 8x% going to the first choice is a good result already. My question is that Kau Yan is in Central district and there are many famous school in that net. But seems only a few student got a seat those famous seconday school.

CandyTheMom

Yea, I have the same query.
The result suggests that those parents put 'less famous school' in their first choice, and so even 8x% went to their first choice schools, the schools were not those 'top in people's mind'...why is that so?

Is that because they didn't think those top (but probably very academic-focused) schools didn't fit their children?
Or is that because they they didn't have a good 'banding' and so won't be able to get into those top schools.
Anyone who have more experience in secondary school allocation can give us some advice/feedback?

原帖由 im_csb 於 11-10-28 21:21 發表
I understand 8x% going to the first choice is a good result already. My question is that Kau Yan is in Central district and there are many famous school in that net. But seems only a few student got a ...

ahkc

Good question! any insight?

redkoni

原帖由 im_csb 於 11-10-27 23:40 發表
看過website's record, 救恩派位好似派位不太理想
是因為程度比其他中西區低一點嗎?

全級頭十名成績相信也不錯, 問題是東九龍匯基每年都留20-30個位給救恩, 學生是否一定要四月簽undertaking給匯基, 而放棄統一派位大抽獎?  以今年為例, 這21位匯基學生應該有一定數目的Band1學生, 如果參加統一派位大抽獎, 或者會多幾位英華女學校, 英皇, 聖士提反女校, 聖若瑟, 皇仁, 庇理羅士等...你能否答我?

GIPW

好好的分析. But we need some existing parents to give us some insight

im_csb

但去匯基網頁, 佢去年在本港升讀大學只有十人, 海外升學只有一人, 這樣升大學率計, 和band 1 的中學有一段距離

ngsmum

I visited the 匯基網頁 earlier, can't find the # of student admitted to U but from their school report, the % of 14 pt in 6 subject is 5x% in the last HKCEE, which in my impression, is similar to Ramondi or St. Louis?

tattc

我想講現在見到既派位成績，並不可以代所有救恩學生。因為自從陳梁淑貞校長加入之後，好多家長都認為課程係加深咗好多，所以我會期望幾年後見到既成績！

CandyTheMom

This is true. Mrs. Chan joined the school three years ago.

My friend asked her directly in the info session why students in KY have good languages capabilities, analytical power, world perspectives, love and motivated to learn, but the 派位成績 (which implied academic results) didn't seem to be good.

Her first response is that she thought the 派位成績 was good: More than 80% went to their first choice schools (refer to our discussions about the problem we raised).

Then, when my friend asked bluntly that 'from outsiders' perspectives, those schools listed were not the top top schools in the area...do you think it was because the students are still 'the old type' of students...(selected before she joined).

Mrs. Chan actually admitted partly and said she has spent a lot of time to change the curriculum (took almost 3 years), and she could see the children admitted-in are smarter and smarter, and she is very confident the academic results goes better and better.

原帖由 tattc 於 11-10-31 19:57 發表
我想講現在見到既派位成績，並不可以代所有救恩學生。因為自從陳梁淑貞校長加入之後，好多家長都認為課程係加深咗好多，所以我會期望幾年後見到既成績！ ...

im_csb

Just refer the link below :

http://www.ucc.edu.hk/upload/M007/畢業同學出路/中七10-11.doc

im_csb

I agree and I hope the result will be better and better.
However, my friends just reminded me that 升中係一個看過去學校成績的遊戲 , that's why I have concern on it.

原帖由 CandyTheMom 於 11-10-31 20:50 發表
This is true. Mrs. Chan joined the school three years ago.

My friend asked her directly in the info session why students in KY have good languages capabilities, analytical power, world perspectives, ...

redkoni

2011年  救恩升中派位分佈

學校	人數	末代會考>=14分(%)
東九龍匯基	21	51.3
英華女學校	9
基督教崇真	7
聖保羅書院	5
港大同學會	4
中華基金	2
香港真光中學	2	68
聖類斯	2	53.1
聖保羅男女	1	91.6
男拔	1
喇沙	1	74.7
英皇	1	75.7
聖若瑟	1	72.9
聖保祿學校	1	86.1
聖士提反書院	1
蕭明	1	67
培基書院	1
李國寶	1
聖士提反女校	1	71.1
林大輝	1
聖公會鄧肇堅	1
保良局羅氏基金	1
聖嘉勒	1
培僑	5
漢華	3
金文泰	3
嶺南中學	2
香港真光書院	1
鄧肇堅維多利亞官立	1
樂善堂梁銶琚	1
基新中學	1
香港仔浸信會呂明才書院	1	21.7
overseas	3
	88

redkoni

講真, 簽約去匯基的學生都自己知自己事, 應該都是Band1尾Band2頭的邊緣人, 如果真係Band2去統一派位大抽獎一定無運行, 與其冒險, 假假地匯基都算所謂Band1尾, 所以收到21人亦正常, 其中有一半屬Band1學生也不出奇, 但總不能對匯基有太高要求吧.  以我從這2011年派位的分佈估算, 有一半學生即是50%屬Band1學生也算合理, 反映了現時救恩派位的結果並不十分突出, 但最前列的一少羣學生成績及ECA應該十分優異. 雖知今年小六Banding是參考2008 & 2010 師兄師姐的 Pre-S1 HKAT成績, 你們只能期望學生一年比一年進步, 考好Pre-S1 HKAT去提升後來的師弟師妹Banding, 不過, 你進步時同一校網其他學校也可以進步, 畢竟升中Banding也是一個zero-sum game!  

我講嘅係咁多,  留返俾啲有insight嘅人發表其他意見.

ngsmum

I think the correct website should be this one:

http://www.uccke.edu.hk/