用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 舊油天 vs 陳守仁
發新帖
查看: 2070|回覆: 12
go

舊油天 vs 陳守仁 [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1755
1#
發表於 09-6-17 01:47 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印
請分享.
   0    0    0    0
:-D

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1755
2#
發表於 09-6-17 15:56 |只看該作者
陳守仁派位如何,在哪可看到資料?THANKS
:-D

Rank: 3Rank: 3


218
3#
發表於 09-6-17 16:56 |只看該作者
派得唔錯,呢到有得睇:
http://www.plkctslps.edu.hk/students-student_sspa-2006-2008.php

派去一級直資及津貼英中這兩年約60-75人,35-42%左右,其餘都係選擇入普通次一級直資,可能係讀慣直資吧,另外網頁冇寫批3、40個應該派得唔係咁好。

論津校派位兩間油天好似好少少;不過,佢呢兩年派入喇沙的人數又比較多,可謂各有「特色」。

[ 本帖最後由 marius 於 09-6-17 18:21 編輯 ]


5432
4#
發表於 09-6-17 16:57 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2335
5#
發表於 09-6-17 19:24 |只看該作者
原帖由 miffy 於 09-6-17 16:57 發表
陳守仁係英小, 全英教學, 連家長會, 和平時和班主任contact都是用英文溝通, 有法文和日文科, 升中好似7x%去英中 (我唔sure, 有錯請更正), 好多印度, 南亞學生讀, 有d人可能介意。

油天係傳統老校, 中文小學, 派位67 ...


St. Mary中學唔係收好多外來生(上年得2個舊油天生入St. Mary中學), 舊油天畢業女生最多係去真光女書院(上年有14個).......

[ 本帖最後由 mission 於 09-6-17 19:34 編輯 ]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1755
6#
發表於 09-6-18 02:20 |只看該作者
謝謝大家.

根據網頁,陳守仁派去一級直資及津貼英中這兩年約70-85%吧,好似比油天好少少,因有入喇沙.

津校派位舊油天女仔去真光,男仔多華仁.

但係咪陳守仁程度深D呢?

請問細仔讀邊間會好D呢.
:-D

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2335
7#
發表於 09-6-18 09:12 |只看該作者
原帖由 gs 於 09-6-18 02:20 發表
謝謝大家.

根據網頁,陳守仁派去一級直資及津貼英中這兩年約70-85%吧,好似比油天好少少,因有入喇沙.

津校派位舊油天女仔去真光,男仔多華仁.

但係咪陳守仁程度深D呢?

請問細仔讀邊間會好D呢. ...


冇咁多掛,陳守仁不嬲學生入Band 1中學嘅數字都係少過兩間油天. 雖然陳守仁有學生入到名校,但最多學生都係去香港管理專業協會李國寶中學同埋保良局顏保鈴書院......

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1352
8#
發表於 09-6-18 11:04 |只看該作者
Dear mission,

TSL secondary school allocation is not as bad as you may seem to imply either.

According to their 2007-8 figures, 75 students went to Band 1 schools including a number of traditional brand-name schools.

On the other hand, 70 students went to different DSS schools which are too new to have any banding assignments yet.  They include some through-train schools highly sought after by P1 applicants, such as Evangel, St Margaret, Pui Kiu, GT, in addition to PLK Ngan Po Ling and Li Kwok Po that you have mentioned.

Assuming that they have a total of 150 graduates (30 x 5), that means 97% of them fell into the above categories last year (50% for the first and 47% for the second).  Hence it is almost safe to say that their students will either go to a band 1 school or a good DSS which may be classified as band 1 in the future.

They actually showed some improvements when compared to the previous year’s figures (62 – first category and 66 – second category).

It will be interesting to see if the trend continues this year.  Keep it up, TSL kids!

原帖由 mission 於 09-6-18 09:12 發表


冇咁多掛,陳守仁不嬲學生入Band 1中學嘅數字都係少過兩間油天. 雖然陳守仁有學生入到名校,但最多學生都係去香港管理專業協會李國寶中學同埋保良局顏保鈴書院...... ...

[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 09-6-18 11:06 編輯 ]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2335
9#
發表於 09-6-18 12:20 |只看該作者
原帖由 kaifu 於 09-6-18 11:04 發表
Dear mission,

TSL secondary school allocation is not as bad as you may seem to imply either.

According to their 2007-8 figures, 75 students went to Band 1 schools including a number of traditional b ...


其實陳守仁自己個網頁年年都係選擇性登畢業生分佈資料(唔似油天網頁咁清楚),個年小六生有179個,佢剩係列出145個,佢話係Band1個啲中學有少部份可能都唔係.....

陳守仁小學公佈畢業生分佈
http://www.plkctslps.edu.hk/students-student_sspa-2006-2008.php

陳守仁小學班級結構
http://psp.proj.hkedcity.net/chi/parser.php?file=chi/detail_sch_class_stru.htm&school_id=190

[ 本帖最後由 mission 於 09-6-18 12:35 編輯 ]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1352
10#
發表於 09-6-18 12:35 |只看該作者
Still, there were 80% of the P6 graduates going to a band 1 school or a DSS school, if the total number were 179 last year.  As 2 of the DSS schools were not completely english schools.  There were about 76% of students admitted to EMI schools (a little bit better than the 74% in YMTCPS).  

Keep in mind that they have 10-20% non-Chinese kids which may not go to mainstream secondary schools.

I think you need to provide hard evidences to show which band 1 schools they listed are actually not band 1 schools.

It is obvious that TSL is not the school of choice for your kids, but that doesn't mean that you need to have a "mission" to badmouth the school.


原帖由 mission 於 09-6-18 12:20 發表


其實陳守仁自己個網頁只係選擇性登畢業生分佈資料(唔似油天咁清楚),個年小六生有179個,佢剩係列出145個,佢話係Band1個啲中學有少部份可能都唔係.....

陳守仁小學公佈畢業生分佈
http://www.plkctslps.edu.hk/stud ...

[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 09-6-18 13:24 編輯 ]

Rank: 6Rank: 6


8771
11#
發表於 09-6-18 15:36 |只看該作者
2間都係油尖旺區學校,
一間係英文小學, 要交學費, 多南亞裔人士.
一間有40年歷史老牌津貼小學, 中文以普通話教學, 由於抽獎關係, 學生程度上有差距.


2間都無直屬中學, 學生派位都係靠成績/靠運氣.

以津貼小學來講, 油天派位真係唔錯, 特別係男仔, 華仁及聖芳濟每係都入幾十人, 女仔多選真光, 學校每年都登出所有學生派位成績, 絕不隱瞞.

可能陳守仁家長一直都有交開學費, 所以佢地唔介意中學入直資繼續交學費, 相對起油天, 佢地入直資既人數係多好多.

去年, 我認識陳守仁家長, 佢話讀得叻既女仔, 好多都一早考入st. paul/德望, 因為佢地係英文小學, 仲有部份有讀法文, 考此類英中係會有優勝之處. 朋友個女都係first round入左st. paul, 無參加抽獎.   至於讀得一般既, 派位就真係好一般, 好多都要考返英文直資學校, 因為佢地讀開英文, 讀唔到一般既中文中學.

[ 本帖最後由 必必 於 09-6-18 15:41 編輯 ]

Rank: 4


636
12#
發表於 09-6-18 15:37 |只看該作者
Personally, I will choose 陳守仁 as their language environment is definitely better than 油天. To me, I think kids must have good foundation in order to get higher or better education. I'm not saying that 油天 is not good, but I think 陳守仁 can provide much better education than 油天. Just say speaking, if a kid can speak fluently in English or other language, students can apply better secondary school.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


213
13#
發表於 09-6-19 15:44 |只看該作者
Actually TSL also use Putonghua to teach Chinese starting from P2.


原帖由 必必 於 09-6-18 15:36 發表
2間都係油尖旺區學校,
一間係英文小學, 要交學費, 多南亞裔人士.
一間有40年歷史老牌津貼小學, 中文以普通話教學, 由於抽獎關係, 學生程度上有差距. ...
‹ 上一主題|下一主題