- 在線時間
- 403 小時
- 最後登錄
- 19-7-15
- 國民生產力
- 35
- 附加生產力
- 2112
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-12-10
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1597
- 主題
- 23
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 3744
- UID
- 116224
|
本帖最後由 hogwarts 於 13-2-15 02:15 編輯
回復 Charlotte_mom 的帖子
The review report of SPCPS:
http://www.spc-ps.edu.hk/upload_files/na/33_cr_full_report_for_public.pdf
SPCPS 2011-2012 school report:
http://www.spc-ps.edu.hk/profile/School_Report_11-12.pdf
One interesting background of SPC and her primary school, they are governed by a chapter of Laws of Hong Kong. Only few old schools enjoyed this funny privilege. The chapter is St. Paul's College Council Incorporation Ordinance, Laws of Hong Kong Chapter 1102. It does not mean the school is necessary good but the school is just old enough that in those days establishing a school was a bill of the legislative council. Well, it seems that the legislative body in the past did discuss thing more important than the current one.
Interview with PTH & English spelling? Never heard of, and the Principal, Ms. Chan, has stated several times that she believes in education in mother tongue. The main rationale that SPCPS Arithmetic classes are in Chinese. However, the school, by no means Ms. Chan herself, promised that after 6 years in SPCPS, boys should be able to communicate with PTH and English, but not necessary as good as native speakers.
They have PTH class right from the beginning P1 and starting from P3 Chinese lessons are conducted in PTH. This was first introduced in my boy's year, he was the 2009 graduate & most of his fellow boys did meet fair conversational PTH & English std.
Another boy in our family is in RC and the school also provides excellent schooling. Both schools' old boys are very supportive to their schools and this is important as well. I don't know whether KTS has that kind of old boys' support. SPCPS is a better choice might only because of a new campus.
|
|