- 在線時間
- 948 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-4-14
- 國民生產力
- 2
- 附加生產力
- 56466
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 10-7-5
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1520
- 主題
- 47
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 57988
- UID
- 603057
|
I do not mean to be offensive or rude. What is the point of having a chart like this? A conclusion that XXX tops, and YYY follows with ZZZ next in the table. Then? Does it mean that XXX students are better academically, and YYY and ZZZ are weaker in this arena? Or, XXX has a superior management while YYY is relatively poorly administered?
You mentioned, it is for discussion. What is the underneath area which prompts you to initiate discussion? Is it that what makes XXX the best interests you? Or is it what YYY and ZZZ lack to their counterparts? A discussion of this sort, which seems more substantial, is considerably meaningful yet a definite conclusion cannot be reached.
A successful IS (in a Hong Kong context) is one which helps kids to grow, and if possible, to excel in certain area(s).
Again, and sincerely, I do not mean to be offensive or rude. I am just skeptical about how a ranking like this does any good to EK members here. If my words are too strong, please pardon me. |
|