- 在線時間
- 10 小時
- 最後登錄
- 14-3-29
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 114
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-8-15
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 39
- 主題
- 4
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 153
- UID
- 152887
 
|
I never complained about the school's logistics as I think they were still acceptable no matter how long I have waited (as long as everyone was self-disciplined). I was really shocked about the incident happened at the very end -- which shows how much they care. We were invited to this school for interview, we were not from nowhere and came to use their bathroom. You invited a guest to your home for dinner, and after the dinner, you do not allow your guest to use your bathroom for his natural physical need (and the need is urgent). If DBS is not so remote up the hill, or if there is a public restroom just around the corner, or if I know more about Mongkok like other parents, or if I know how easy to get to the “Chinese restaurant” mentioned by that young lady, or if I could get a taxi easily from DBS during the shift-changing time, I would be a trouble-maker. I wonder why a parent said it so easy to take one minute to go down the hill by taxi – but I could not see any taxi all all! Her husband must be a taxi-owner! -- I don’t take risk and I don’t lie to my son that I could be able to find a toilet for him within minutes as I had no idea at all. What I could tell my son is all the fact and my prudential estimation.
All in all, what a big deal was it? -- I was not asking to use the principal’s office!
Talking about that there should be rules to control, yes, I absolutely agree. But first thing first. If the rules override humanity, there should be something we need to stop and rethink. If you feel uncomfortable and would like to go in to rest, I guess they will still insist that you need to leave – or someone would say “If you allow for one person, the second one will come.” Even if the bathroom is opened for all, I bet no parent dare to break any rules to make any mess or they would be blacklist.
Some people would think that a kid should not have such an urgent need to go to bathroom after two hours (as there was no water intake). I presume they do not know every child (person) is unique; or they have never taken care of little children in person, or they only have their own kids in their eyes and project their kids’ condition to all other children (i.e. since theirs do not need to pee right after the interview, and therefore, they conclude it is unreasonable that other children have the need). They may not be aware that whether there is a urgent need to pee would also depend upon what food the child has taken, how much he drank, how big his bladder is, how high/low his metabolic rate is, how his health condition was and how excited/nervous he was. It seems these people would be with the same mindset of those staff I encountered – perfect match with DBS.
When I see others really need help, I will not cross my arms and make up stories that they made the trouble by themselves -- I am keen to offer help. It is my character and therefore, DBS does not match my family. I want my son to learn to be a good Samaritan instead of that priest mentioned in Luke 10:25-37.
This school -- has already been dropped to the bottom of my priority (-- some parents must be very happy to hear about this as one competitor will have gone --- but it is the fact).
Why I keep nagging on this matter? 很簡單,發義怒囖! |
|
發表於 12-10-12 15:09
唔外借洗手間可能有原因呢!但
