用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 升中派位 聖若瑟書院 VS 男拔萃書院
樓主: Graff
go

聖若瑟書院 VS 男拔萃書院   [複製鏈接]

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


10407
301#
發表於 25-1-22 11:48 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 KikiDaddy 於 25-1-23 14:27 編輯
Sing13 發表於 25-1-22 11:02
全港最多人考,學術要求最高既應該是TSL,六年後都有一定比例既band2生。點可能唔超過雙位數?
考小學時, ...

You just brought up a very good example to show the advantage of DSS schools.

TSL SSPA results: -

https://www.edu-kingdom.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=3879669

Students allocated to Band 2 secondary schools are just a few percentage while a high percentage of students are allocated to Band 1A / B schools. YWPS band 2 students % may be higher as they are guaranteed a place at YWC while TSL students need to go thru SSPA. However, the quality of YWPS P1 intake should be as good as TSL if not better than. No one can deny any good primary school will have Band 2 or 3 students but my question is “how many”?

Yes, some DSS schools DSE results are just mediocre. Their teaching quality may be an issue but the quality of student intake will also affect. Not all DSS schools can have highly selective student intake like YW and TSL.

YWC, as a DSS school, if some of the top students of YWPS go for other elite schools like SPCC, DBS and LSC, it can fill up the vacancies with Band 1 students from other primary schools. SJC, as a subsidized school, it can only allocated the places to the Band 2 students of its feeder schools if some top students “jump ship”.

This unfair and faulty feeder school allocation mechanism have created pressure on Band 1 schools with feeder school arrangement. Some schools like WYHK and SSGC tried to transform to DSS until strongly objected by their stakeholders. Some schools like Methodist College and CSK just simply disconnect the feeder school relationship.

Going back to SJC DSE results, 2024 5*+ % is higher than 2022, 5+ % is similar while  4+ % is lower. The difference is not that significant.






Rank: 5Rank: 5


2652
302#
發表於 25-1-22 13:30 |只看該作者
英華小學咁揀人法,期望佢成績應該拍得住SPCC 才啱。
利申當年亞仔三面不入

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1784
303#
發表於 25-1-22 14:07 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 肥仔爸B 於 25-1-22 14:08 編輯

YWPS 班 P1又點會係個個 top 5%(165/4000),拍得住SPCC? 頭果批通常都手執幾個offer, EK大把老前輩都話要先揀SPCC、DBS、SPC、港同,剩係呢4間都唔知執走左幾多Top 5%. 但YWPS係勁在過左6年後,唔係 Top 5%果班都可以培養到其他B1AA 中學間間想要,而留低YWC果班,都仍然有B1A成績,所以學校的確係教得有一手。

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


10407
304#
發表於 25-1-22 15:24 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 KikiDaddy 於 25-1-22 15:28 編輯

回覆 肥仔爸B 的帖子

Assuming all the 165 applicants received the first round offers decline YWPS and the quality of the 4000 applicants is just a simulation for the overall HK population, the next 165 applicants with second round offers are still well within top 10% and are definitely with Band 1A caliber.

If the top 10% of these 165 YWPS students can get the offers from SPCC / DBS in P6, I would say it is as expected instead of surprise.  TSL have over 50% Band 1A schools allocation (excluding 6 students allocated to DBS as it is regarded as Band 1B ). YWPS should deliver a comparable result as it is a preferred choice ahead of TSL in P1.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1784
305#
發表於 25-1-22 16:34 |只看該作者
咁YWPS P6畢業生基本上係100% 升上 B1A中學添(只要主科合格)😂

又要假設全部top YWPS 都要跳走晒去SPCC同DBS呢兩間學校, 唔比佢地留原校😅

聽聞呢幾屆愈來愈多top 50%留原校,級頭都有留低。同埋好似就算去到前50名,SPCC同DBS都有收。不過唔知有無在校家長證實。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1784
306#
發表於 25-1-22 16:41 |只看該作者
重有男女發展時期唔同。男仔通常遲發展,升小top果批男仔唔代表DSE都係top果批,大把都係中學先開始追

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


10407
307#
發表於 25-1-22 18:58 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 KikiDaddy 於 25-2-5 17:00 編輯

回覆 肥仔爸B 的帖子

That's exactly what I am saying - YWPS produces a pool of talented students for YWC. Its percentage of Band 1A students should be comparable to TSL.
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
你需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊