- 在線時間
- 1268 小時
- 最後登錄
- 25-6-25
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 9571
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 11-11-9
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 836
- 主題
- 3
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 10407
- UID
- 827632
  
|
本帖最後由 KikiDaddy 於 25-1-23 14:27 編輯
Sing13 發表於 25-1-22 11:02 
全港最多人考,學術要求最高既應該是TSL,六年後都有一定比例既band2生。點可能唔超過雙位數?
考小學時, ...
You just brought up a very good example to show the advantage of DSS schools.
TSL SSPA results: -
https://www.edu-kingdom.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=3879669
Students allocated to Band 2 secondary schools are just a few percentage while a high percentage of students are allocated to Band 1A / B schools. YWPS band 2 students % may be higher as they are guaranteed a place at YWC while TSL students need to go thru SSPA. However, the quality of YWPS P1 intake should be as good as TSL if not better than. No one can deny any good primary school will have Band 2 or 3 students but my question is “how many”?
Yes, some DSS schools DSE results are just mediocre. Their teaching quality may be an issue but the quality of student intake will also affect. Not all DSS schools can have highly selective student intake like YW and TSL.
YWC, as a DSS school, if some of the top students of YWPS go for other elite schools like SPCC, DBS and LSC, it can fill up the vacancies with Band 1 students from other primary schools. SJC, as a subsidized school, it can only allocated the places to the Band 2 students of its feeder schools if some top students “jump ship”.
This unfair and faulty feeder school allocation mechanism have created pressure on Band 1 schools with feeder school arrangement. Some schools like WYHK and SSGC tried to transform to DSS until strongly objected by their stakeholders. Some schools like Methodist College and CSK just simply disconnect the feeder school relationship.
Going back to SJC DSE results, 2024 5*+ % is higher than 2022, 5+ % is similar while 4+ % is lower. The difference is not that significant.
|
|