- 在線時間
- 0 小時
- 最後登錄
- 07-6-24
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 0
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-3-15
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 6
- 主題
- 0
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 6
- UID
- 76667

|
Re: CDNIS Vs SIS
There is not much point in comparing the English standard between different schools. Firstly, as you said, there is no conclusive evidence. Secondly, shall we compare the top students of each school? How about the worst ones? Even if we compare the "average" standard prevailing in the schools, but what is good English? If you go to the following site, you will see that the students in England make a lot more spelling and grammatical errors than foreign students.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=378694&in_page_id=1770
So shall we say that schools in England have higher spoken standard, but lower written standard, than schools in foreign countries? Or spelling and grammar just don't count? Even if there were conclusive evidence showing that one particular school's "average" standard is higher than the rest, how can we be sure that our own kid is smart enough to reach this standard? There is no answer to all these questions. The gist of the question is if you want your kid to learn in school Putonghua and Simplified Chinese characters to more or less the same standard as English, then SIS will be fine. If you think that English is a lot more important than Putonghua and Simplified Chinese characters, or if you think that these could be learned by private tuition or later on in life, then ESF will be fine.
|
|