ESF foundation schools

Moonlight819

858 發表於 17-2-18 19:09
SJS未必讀，一直RC先係首選

For RC, your waiting no. is 1x, I think you can get the offer very soon!

858

Moonlight819 發表於 17-2-18 22:29
For RC, your waiting no. is 1x, I think you can get the offer very soon!

It's sjs, not RC. RC doesn't disclose position or number on waitlist.

Moonlight819

858 發表於 17-2-19 00:12
It's sjs, not RC. RC doesn't disclose position or number on waitlist.

RC doesn't disclose your number, but they can tell you whether your position such as in the front, middle or at the back!

Fionanylau

858 發表於 17-2-18 19:09
SJS未必讀，一直RC先係首選

You mind to share the reason of preferring RC than SJS? I am struggling between the two...

hong0706

Moonlight819 發表於 17-2-19 00:16
RC doesn't disclose your number, but they can tell you whether your position such as in the front,  ...

RC never disclosed such information.

hong0706

858 發表於 17-2-18 16:38
Luckily we got a good position on waitlist, say 1X candidates ahead of us.

I am quite sure you will soon get an offer.

hong0706

858 發表於 17-2-18 19:09
SJS未必讀，一直RC先係首選

You can buy your way in by paying $400k to get the RC offer in the next round.

bb127

Fionanylau 發表於 17-2-19 01:01
You mind to share the reason of preferring RC than SJS? I am struggling between the two...

I got both offer but should choose SJS though  RC is closer to home

858

hong0706 發表於 17-2-19 01:41
You can buy your way in by paying $400k to get the RC offer in the next round.

Yes, I could purchase the NR but the question is whether I'm willing to pay for it. In this case, that 'pay to play' thing becomes totally unfair - my son passed the interview too, why didn't RC offer him a place? Why would he need to pay money to be moved up on waitlist? Why did his classmates who never pay for NR received an offer? What the hxxx did he do to deserve these? If we intended to get him in with money, we should have bought it before the interview, no need to wait until today.... We're not preparing for long waits nor to pay for the PREMIUM SERVICE to jump the line at this moment.
NR policy makes a good economic sense but it also represents an idea of putting profit first.

858

Fionanylau 發表於 17-2-19 01:01
You mind to share the reason of preferring RC than SJS? I am struggling between the two...

You are being so indecent to ask me such a question..
Declaration of interests : no  ESF schools offer yet

858

little-pig-pig 發表於 17-2-18 15:34
我相信我們大部分學生家長應該冇local school個邊咁自私兩邊都交留位費拖到開學前先决定吧
...

佢地成本少，落幾多注都無所謂

Fionanylau

858 發表於 17-2-19 05:06
You are being so indecent to ask me such a question..
Declaration of interests : no  ESF schools off ...

My apology...

nintendo

真心想幫忙那些網友，唔該唔好又講返已經討論過的情形。
好地地又講乜 NR ？
搞風搞雨。

hong0706

NR 就係解決現時問題的一個好實際的方法, 係真正解決到,唔似你只只係指指點點, 冇貢獻。

nintendo

已經討論過 NR ，想比已經比咗。
這網友一早講咗十分不滿 NR 這個制度，
本來大家回復平靜心情，點解要再提？
看你舊 post ，似係不滿 RC ，希望你唔好利用這 topic 玩批鬥。

hong0706

我從來不喜歡批鬥，更冇不滿RC, 我一直提供有用資訊，如：點應對RC面試,佢揀人方法, 及到今天仍可買NR去解決找不到P1的家長（或好想入RC的人）。

而你, 不斷維護ESF, 代言人咁, 唔啱聽就話人玩批鬥，你有俾過幾多有用資訊？

這平台應用來分享資訊，互相勉勵，唔係俾你指指點點。

858

大家唔好嘈，NR制度本人意見係認為俾當初無信心面試合格或無面試機會的小朋友，考慮買的。但而家面試合格佐，無位俾我，要有'路費'先有位，似乎講唔過去了。心底裏會覺得唔公平，一班同學大家咁高咁大，一樣合格，一批唔使俾錢已經有學位，另一批要比大筆金錢先至有位。如果制造短缺，係學校賺更多錢嘅策略，令本來無意慾買嘅家長考慮購買，恕我不能認同。
--學校email提到百幾個位入面一半俾晒sibling同NR holders. 一半放出來爭餐死。
--
事實上我收到通知候補嗰日，已經打咗去學校問情況同買NR事宜，好直接問佢哋會唔會快啲，佢地好爽快答 : 一定快好多！

申請Y1前，我亦打過去問個人提名權，佢哋話提名權係有個面試機會，但都可能會唔合格，當時只係九月中左右但NR已經'沽清'!!，當我問到公司提名權有更高priority，佢話即刻可以安排ESF個經理同我進一步詳細介紹。
--
我有位教育界朋友幫我引見過某esf前校長，佢幫我小朋友做過familiarison interview, 結果良好。事實上我小朋友亦獲得二間國際學校取錄，該校競爭一樣激烈，一年前已經報名，位唔多，大約收20多個， 面試當日同一組亦好幾個ESF TY WKS同學。其實hong0706提議買NR係一種解決方法，但其實點都有書讀，我情況未到非買NR不可。咁嘅做生意手法亦有問題，此風不可長。

Saboc

858，有point 有方向！隨著自己的想法去選擇，其實真係大把路。

Moonlight819

858 發表於 17-2-19 13:46
大家唔好嘈，NR制度本人意見係認為俾當初無信心面試合格或無面試機會的小朋友，考慮買的。但而家面試合格佐 ...

你是否已交那間IS的留位費？那你更加不用擔心吧！

858

回覆 Moonlight819 的帖子

已交:)
純粹貪RC教繁體同去完info session幾鐘意，但計過條數，如果請本地certified teacher私補中文，當$300-450/小時，用本地課本，一星期三次。唔計四十萬每年可產生嘅回報，純粹四十萬都夠俾六年補習費，而且一對一比大班教學更intensive同有效。六年教育加睇書，應用都應該冇問題， 事實上本地六年級畢業的同學寫的文章亦很OK
我覺得可行，因為同一個實驗我用過係英文科身上，當時老師話佢英文唔夠好，我唔明點唔好但是但啦，佢提議我另外返playgroup。我索性請咗個前ESF老師補，補習內容都係講故事，同小朋友傾下閑計，畫畫，玩小遊戲。但效果超卓。睇返大家留言先知，原來老師同樣會話其他小朋友英文唔夠好。