- 在線時間
- 1385 小時
- 最後登錄
- 25-8-19
- 國民生產力
- 25
- 附加生產力
- 14198
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-3-17
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 9460
- 主題
- 69
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 23683
- UID
- 128866
  
|
本帖最後由 annie40 於 15-10-16 14:53 編輯
回覆 Activehealth 的帖子
haha, that is what they say so.
However, there is no formal assessment to reflect the true improved ability of individual student in various groups. All depends on individual teacher's recommendation. Sometimes group teachers would like to keep several more ability students in the medium group to reflect the group's progress result good enough. Students may have ability to take something more challenging, but if they keep learning 小猫, 小狗repeatly , and teachers don't want to let them go. It would be quite difficult to have progress consistently. By the way, group A is a place Chinese teachers want to boost up the number of outstanding students taking IB Chinese A (billigual IB students). They would do the best to teach you for the target.
I am not going to degrade ESF Chinese teachers. It is kind of 人性. Principal and other subjects teachers are Guilo, they know very little about Chinese Department. Always I believe all students can learn, Chinese lessons hours are sufficient. If the way in teaching and the curriculum are improved, ESF Chinese level would be much better as well.
As a matter of fact I send my daughter to international school , I really don't mind her Chinese level. However, she likes Chinese cultures and has potential to write well. So I try to understand how to learn good Chinese? why some kids left behind? what's wrong with the curriculum? why most students feel boring in Chinese lessons? is it any way to do it better? I saw the waste. Yes, students can do it much better............
|
|