用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 教育講場 Al最大機會影響的5種職業
查看: 7741|回覆: 60
go

Al最大機會影響的5種職業

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


116412
發表於 24-10-20 08:03 |顯示全部帖子
AI isn't likely to replace humans at work, says report—but 5 occupations may soon feel its impact more

Artificial intelligence is already changing the way some people work, but it's not yet poised to replace the work that humans do, according to a new report from Indeed.

No workplace skills out of more than 2,800 identified by Indeed Hiring Lab were "very likely" to be replaced by generative AI, the report, published on Sept. 25, found. 

A 68.7% majority of skills were "very unlikely" or "unlikely" to be replaced by AI, while 28.5% of skills may "potentially" be replaceable. Indeed's report examined soft skills like communication, leadership and organization, more technical skills including specific coding languages, and hands-on skills such as cooking and administering medication.

"We were able to take all these skills, map them to over a million job postings that we had over the last year or so, and then evaluate: Could gen AI replace a human being in performing this particular job function?" says Svenja Gudell, Indeed's chief economist. "When we did that, the result was actually quite striking because we found that there were really no skills — literally zero — that were very likely to be replaceable."

Indeed used GPT-4o, OpenAI's latest multimodal generative AI model, to evaluate its own ability to perform work skills across three areas: provide theoretical knowledge related to skills, use those skills to solve problems and execute those skills either physically or digitally. 

The model then used that assessment to rate the likelihood of whether generative AI could replace a person to carry out a given skill.
The research indicates that AI is only suited, for now, to serve a support role for workers: While AI has relatively high technical competency, without stronger problem-solving capability and hands-on functionality, it can't compete with human labor.

"Our takeaway was that gen AI, in its current form at least — now that's a pretty important caveat — would be a very advanced digital assistant, and it could certainly make us more productive in some settings," Gudell says. "But it's not replacing the human quite yet."

Indeed's researchers considered 16 occupations in their study and highlighted five jobs that involve the greatest share of skills that have the potential to be replaced by AI. Those lines of work are:

* Accounting professionals
* Marketing and advertising specialists
* Software developers
* Health care administrative support staff
* Insurance claims and inspection officers

The technical and often repetitive nature of the skills needed for those roles play into AI's strengths, says Gudell, in addition to the fact that those professions tend to require less physical interaction. 

On the other hand, occupations that demand client or customer exchange, physical presence or less repetitive problem-solving are the least likely to be replaceable, she adds, citing patient-facing health care work such as nursing as examples.

Still, workers shouldn't shy away from certain career paths that are more susceptible to being replaced by AI, according to Gudell. Instead, she explains, people interested in software development, for instance, should learn to use AI tools to increase their productivity and boost their competitiveness in the job market.

"It's really all about using these tools to your maximum advantage when you're searching for a job," Gudell says.

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2024/10/14/ai-isnt-ready-to-replace-human-jobs-5-professions-may-feel-its-impact-more.html


Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


116412
發表於 24-10-20 08:04 |顯示全部帖子
Software developer 有點意外。
God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2484
發表於 24-10-20 08:57 |顯示全部帖子
ANChan59 發表於 24-10-20 08:04
Software developer 有點意外。

其實我哋都試用緊一啲ChatGPT入面的model 去generate source code. 另外幾個AI project 用LLM + RAG technology, 其實都有一定嘅實用性。所以Microsoft 定位Copilot 都幾貼切吓。 之前有啲人10幾年之前讀過AI,講啲似是而非嘅嘢。

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


116412
發表於 24-10-20 09:14 |顯示全部帖子
barque 發表於 24-10-20 08:57
其實我哋都試用緊一啲ChatGPT入面的model 去generate source code. 另外幾個AI project 用LLM + RAG techn ...

我冇這方面深入的認識,我只是好奇的應用程度。


God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


21150
發表於 24-10-20 09:55 |顯示全部帖子

回覆樓主:

不時有類似行業清單, software developer or coding 都好似有份, 因為少要有文中所講customer exchange? 咁就有D唔明, marketing 又有份?

網上submit insurance claims已經好普遍, 雖然唔知之後係真人定AI處理

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2484
發表於 24-10-20 10:10 |顯示全部帖子
poonseelai 發表於 24-10-20 09:55
不時有類似行業清單, software developer or coding 都好似有份, 因為少要有文中所講customer exchange? 咁 ...

本帖最後由 barque 於 24-10-20 10:11 編輯

其中一個做法,將幾千份文件上載和指定一些websites,然後限制ChatGPT回答問題時只可以在這些資料中尋找答案,唔准上Internet去search其他資料,暫時觀察都幾有用

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


21150
發表於 24-10-20 10:35 |顯示全部帖子
barque 發表於 24-10-20 10:10
本帖最後由 barque 於 24-10-20 10:11 編輯

其中一個做法,將幾千份文件上載和指定一些websites,然後 ...

如何防止AI自己作嘢?美國試過AI自己創作D案例,被發現,律師被罰款

點評

bananaGi    發表於 24-10-30 09:47

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


116412
發表於 24-10-20 11:31 |顯示全部帖子
poonseelai 發表於 24-10-20 09:55
不時有類似行業清單, software developer or coding 都好似有份, 因為少要有文中所講customer exchange? 咁 ...

Marketing 就要請教beastiebristo 的觀察,他曾經說過creative 的部分不能替代。
God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


116412
發表於 24-10-20 11:55 |顯示全部帖子
barque 發表於 24-10-20 10:10
本帖最後由 barque 於 24-10-20 10:11 編輯

其中一個做法,將幾千份文件上載和指定一些websites,然後 ...

兒子公司跟Open AI 談合作,最大挑戰係content 的保密性,當時有考慮report writing 係只限自己公司專用,文本不會讓其他人作參考資料。最後份合約點樣簽就唔知。

去到coding他覺得如果requirement and logic 清楚係好有用。

但他們的項目有很多不確定性及what-if,而且客戶的最後要求可以跟法規不同,或者buyer side and seller side 有完全相反的要求。
God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2484
發表於 24-10-20 12:42 |顯示全部帖子
ANChan59 發表於 24-10-20 11:55
兒子公司跟Open AI 談合作,最大挑戰係content 的保密性,當時有考慮report writing 係只限自己公司專用, ...

我們都係文件只上戴在公司internal storage

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


116412
發表於 24-10-20 12:43 |顯示全部帖子
barque 發表於 24-10-20 12:42
我們都係文件只上戴在公司internal storage

他們係想吸外邊嘅料,但又唔想同人哋分享自己入面嘅料。


God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2484
發表於 24-10-20 12:57 |顯示全部帖子
poonseelai 發表於 24-10-20 10:35
如何防止AI自己作嘢?美國試過AI自己創作D案例,被發現,律師被罰款

如果係Internal knowledge Management用, 可以限制只可以根據上載嘅內部文件資料作為作答,亦都可以調整佢generative 的程度. open AI唔會儲存你任何資料亦都承諾唔可以用你嘅資料作為佢自己嘅training詳情就唔講點樣做啦。

Rank: 6Rank: 6


7178
發表於 24-10-20 13:33 |顯示全部帖子
ANChan59 發表於 24-10-20 08:03
AI isn't likely to replace humans at work, says report—but 5 occupations may soon feel its impact m ...

又AI
到係尼個作者乜水尼?
佢係AI Developer?
佢係AI User?
佢係大學教授?
佢係AI Trader?
其實尼D不學無術都係執人口水尾

有考牌有保護機制行業基本上好難死
你o個行冇牌考冇保護罩
唔洗質素高
一個 "免費" 出尼就乜都死

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


116412
發表於 24-10-20 13:37 |顯示全部帖子
TAIOU4 發表於 24-10-20 13:33
又AI
到係尼個作者乜水尼?
佢係AI Developer?

你提出一個好問題,她是headhunter公司的經濟學家。其他link 入面有講她的背境。

內容撮錄自她在一個HR conference 的分享。
God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


116412
發表於 24-10-20 13:41 |顯示全部帖子
TAIOU4 發表於 24-10-20 13:33
又AI
到係尼個作者乜水尼?
佢係AI Developer?

我同意專業資格係重要嘅,最好係國際認可,不需要再搞互認,增加職業流動性。
God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 8Rank: 8


18551
發表於 24-10-20 13:46 |顯示全部帖子
ANChan59 發表於 24-10-20 08:04
Software developer 有點意外。
顺个人意見.
我们試下叫ChatGPT 4 寫个ChatGPT 5出來(什致寫返佢自己ChatGPT 4), 大家估下得唔得? 但,叫ChatGPT 4寫個ChatGPT 2出來, 有可能, 3都有d有啲抆水.

意思即係话, 一d大家都識寫的, AI極有可能也寫到, 但寫d未有过的App或难题, 佢会比個答案你, 但work 唔work, 有幾work, 佢自己都唔会知. 又例如, 叫佢寫個Quantum computing的程式出來拆解blockchain for algorithm, 你估得唔得?

從software coding來講, 佢可以做好哂d basic野, 又或者比個好詳盡詳细無誤的soft spec佢叫佢寫, 佢有机会寫到, 就好似我地定好晒兼且冇錯漏個Spec, outsource比India的IT公司, 佢可寫比你, 但如你個Spec有d位唔清楚, 你会收到d 垃圾, 你要執佢的code都執到暈.

所以, 用AI replace一d有清澈指示既coding module, 可以, 所以MS Copilot遲d mature左之後會好有幫, 但要replace個software development, 我未睇到可以.

(試下叫文心一言寫個Windows/Android/iOS/Linux出來試試? 或者寫过Telsa自动駕駛系統睇下会唔会撞死人?)


Rank: 6Rank: 6


7178
發表於 24-10-20 13:53 |顯示全部帖子
ANChan59 發表於 24-10-20 13:37
你提出一個好問題,她是headhunter公司的經濟學家。其他link 入面有講她的背境。

內容撮錄自她在一個HR c ...
佢係響度刷人頭拎著數
只要有文出就有關注度
同經濟KOL一樣
你信佢入市跟本冇絕對勝負
因為佢真係乜都唔係

Rank: 8Rank: 8


18551
發表於 24-10-20 13:54 |顯示全部帖子
ANChan59 發表於 24-10-20 13:41
我同意專業資格係重要嘅,最好係國際認可,不需要再搞互認,增加職業流動性。
...
唔好見难, 我意見相反.
因為專業資格,有 確学習訊息, 正正是AI强項, 所有junior所workload, AI 將可案指示完成, 因為有個專業级,無唔的Spec比佢跟住來做. 就好似我之前講, 如果個software spec可以好清楚寫晒出來, 佢就有好大机会做到.


Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


10098
發表於 24-10-20 13:54 |顯示全部帖子
ANChan59 發表於 24-10-20 11:31
Marketing 就要請教beastiebristo 的觀察,他曾經說過creative 的部分不能替代。
e嗰 creative....
最近.我睇AnChan sir ge留言.
吸收.幫助唔少.

題外話. 網友天外之人.
係聽/講.吸收/理解.別人說話時.
障礙不少.
其實. 不同意見.可以用很多方法善用.

一一一

話說下個月一個展覽會.正努力安排.
我自己定了有幾個目標:
1. 盡力發揮自己才能/知識.  用最少錢.得最大效益
2. 后來者居上. 踏入一個新嘅產品行業.
     要打爆有十多二十年的同行
3.建立層次更高的展覽目標.

前兩口.諗緊一 d slogan.
有一堆字眼....
見到 ANChan sir 講limited.
逆向思維. Unlimited.

今早. 睇到一d先前我自己設計的樣板.
又見 creative,

一一一一一

我講返Al.

十分幫助.

比如設計.
把要求清楚列出.
generate 成品作選擇.
再修改.
....
善用的.
速度是驚人的.

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


21150
發表於 24-10-20 13:56 |顯示全部帖子
TAIOU4 發表於 24-10-20 13:33
又AI
到係尼個作者乜水尼?
佢係AI Developer?

indeed有招聘網站, 好似JobsDB咁

我唔敢講有牌唔受影響, 律師也在這類清單出現

近日亮相的 Elon Musk Optimus robot, 識摺衫, 沖咖啡,仲有自動駕駛汽車, 可能受影響的工種或者不少
你需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊