用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 國際學校 Anfield vs Think
查看: 1879|回覆: 25
go

Anfield vs Think

Rank: 3Rank: 3


265
發表於 19-11-15 13:27 |顯示全部帖子
我個仔現時讀緊Think, 剛有Anfield offer, 現請大家比點意見點揀好:
背景:
1. 我們target 個仔入國際學校
2. 無請工人, 我們及長老亦主要同個仔講廣東話(唔想佢從我哋學啲唔係好好的英文), 所以個仔現時鐘意睇中文書並講唔鐘意英文(因為睇/聽唔明), 但睇番THINK都有教英文都開始無咁抗拒, 佢其實都識vocab, 都有睇啲英文歌youtube, 不過始終聽唔明instruction。有時佢睇英文書都ok, 但要翻譯比佢聽
3. 個仔去到ANFIELD 表現麻麻, 亦睇唔出佢好鐘意間學校(可能外籍人士較多), 相比佢去其他名幼面試, 佢在其他學校IN廣東話佢開心好多。但估唔到佢有Anfield offer

Think:
近屋企照顧接送方便, 個仔返學OK開心
將會報K的全日班(如果繼續讀)
但THINK小學並不是我們杯茶, 亦擔心讀THINK未必入到好的國際學校

Anfield:
真國際學校, 並有機會上Anfield 小學或入其他較好國際學校
但唔近屋企, 校巴好似唔到(要傾)
亦都擔心佢唔鐘意返學及唔適應(因為一下子變全英上堂)

本來我們好心儀Anfield, 但諗番啲交通近遠照顧問題都有啲麻煩, 但同時擔心Think 學英文水平未必夠佢上好的國際學校, 同時對Think小學一般。

睇下大家有咩意見, 謝謝各位!



Rank: 6Rank: 6


6430
發表於 19-11-15 13:48 |顯示全部帖子
你講的我都認同,如果只得呢兩個offer , 一定Anfield 啦。但我相信你target 得國際,應該仲有其他學校未in 或未出offer 啫。

Rank: 4


567
發表於 19-11-15 16:47 |顯示全部帖子

回覆樓主:

本帖最後由 細佬Bebe 於 19-11-15 17:01 編輯

本帖最後由 細佬Bebe 於 19-11-15 16:59 編輯

Think is not very international

And if u target international, ur son has to get through the adaptation period anyway.
The smaller he gets through that, the easier for him.As he is not very good in English , u have to put him to a good English immersion place.In this regard, Anfield would better I believe.  

You are surprised that he gets Anfield offer because his English standard is not good.  If his English doesn’t improve in the coming two years, it will be extremely hard for him to get a Y1 offer at an international school better than Anfield.  And without going to Anfield K, you have no chance for its primary.

Just my small sample observation, my fd s son studying in Think for the third year (going to local), English is not good at all.
And according to my fd, almost 100% kids are locals. Most target local schools and speak in Cantonese.

If you target international, that’s not the right circle for you and your kid.

Having said the above, only a minority of Anfield is foreigners (according to my observation at the Laguna verde campus).Not sure about the kln tong campus.

I went to the school visits if its primary and kindergarten.I love Anfield.I have strong faith that it would be a good school.The only reason I didn’t proceed with my application is it is not a 100% through train school.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


43770
發表於 19-11-15 17:17 |顯示全部帖子

回覆樓主:

A校無校車到,係頭赤d。但你繼續留係舊校,係英語方面係比較難達到你的需要

Rank: 4


519
發表於 19-11-15 18:41 |顯示全部帖子
Anfield la. 校車方面,得幾個學生都開線架,但超貴,睇你想吾想,可以同佢傾

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1772
發表於 19-11-16 20:48 |顯示全部帖子
本帖最後由 amy671 於 19-11-19 11:34 編輯

回覆 starryling 的帖子

Consider the IB classes of K for Think (a/v in Kln Tong and Nam Cheung only). Totally different from its local stream. School bus should be a/v and your child can train up his English before moving onto another IS primary.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1085
發表於 19-11-18 22:49 |顯示全部帖子
Anfield is good school

Rank: 3Rank: 3


265
發表於 19-11-19 10:37 |顯示全部帖子
多謝各位意見!
其實現在將會見埋victoria 2ND INTERVIEW, 唔知有無機會

如果讀Victoria 會否都可以幫到上國際學校?
因為Victoria 比較方便少少


Rank: 3Rank: 3


416
發表於 19-11-19 11:19 |顯示全部帖子
edltw 發表於 19-11-19 10:37
多謝各位意見!
其實現在將會見埋victoria 2ND INTERVIEW, 唔知有無機會

If target IS
I prefer anfield>victoria>think

Rank: 4


722
發表於 19-11-19 11:25 |顯示全部帖子

回覆樓主:

主要睇英文,同埋小朋友要有自信去到interview肯講肯玩。後者我相信維記有幫助,前者就睇運氣。

有啲校舍多啲外國人或native English speakers同學仔,但如果你分到大部份本地小朋友嘅班,三班主任嘅情況下,都係會廣東話dominate。但始終長時間接觸NET有個底,加外補/用英語教嘅課外活動,一般都夠考IS。

維幼每年都有一定數目嘅中途轉國際學校(仲要係多人爭嗰啲老牌IS),但我見到嘅幾個成功例子,嗰啲小朋友屋企都有個native/near native English speaker家長發功…

Rank: 3Rank: 3


265
發表於 19-11-19 11:31 |顯示全部帖子
回覆 dem0cracy 的帖子

就你所講, 似乎單靠維記學英文應該唔夠入國際小學
其實咁細個盡量唔想外補.......

Rank: 3Rank: 3


265
發表於 19-11-19 11:32 |顯示全部帖子
回覆 Sumsumsum123 的帖子

just because the english environment is much better in Anfield rather than Victoria?

Rank: 4


722
發表於 19-11-19 12:05 |顯示全部帖子
edltw 發表於 19-11-19 11:31
回覆 dem0cracy 的帖子

就你所講, 似乎單靠維記學英文應該唔夠入國際小學

但維記有得學吓中文,NET time算好多,又接近IS style,其實個package係吸引嘅,但有風險囉…
希望有入咗IS嘅前維幼用家分享吓…

Rank: 3Rank: 3


416
發表於 19-11-19 12:24 |顯示全部帖子
edltw 發表於 19-11-19 11:32
回覆 Sumsumsum123 的帖子

just because the english environment is much better in Anfield rather than ...

本帖最後由 Sumsumsum123 於 19-11-19 12:24 編輯

Ys, if there is native english speaker at home, i think victoria is still ok for targeting IS
If not,to play safe,anfield is better

Rank: 3Rank: 3


295
發表於 19-11-20 09:19 |顯示全部帖子
回覆 Sumsumsum123 的帖子

can you share more about anfield?

Rank: 4


587
發表於 19-11-21 10:23 |顯示全部帖子
edltw 發表於 19-11-15 13:27
我個仔現時讀緊Think, 剛有Anfield offer, 現請大家比點意見點揀好:
背景:
1. 我們target 個仔入國際學校

分享一吓用家經驗,我小朋友喺Think畢業,由N班讀到K3, K班開始讀全日,屋企人唔會講英文,全靠Think老師教導,小朋友嘅英文好唔錯,由一年級開始老師已經問喺邊間幼稚園讀書,英文口音非常標準。再者,小朋友嘅普通話無外補都唔錯。 感恩考小學都有好幾間offer。而家已經讀到高小。
我想講Think嘅語景幾好,起碼喺小孩學外語嘅黃金時間學校真係幫到我地。
當然,樓主目標為本讀IS, Think應該唔係首選。

Rank: 3Rank: 3


265
發表於 19-11-21 11:54 |顯示全部帖子
回覆 msbear 的帖子

多謝分享。其實我自己都鐘意THINK, 但都是擔心爭唔入國際學校。你小朋友讀直私還是津小?

Rank: 4


587
發表於 19-11-21 12:10 |顯示全部帖子
edltw 發表於 19-11-21 11:54
回覆 msbear 的帖子

多謝分享。其實我自己都鐘意THINK, 但都是擔心爭唔入國際學校。你小朋友讀直私還是津 ...

小朋友最終揀咗直資龍校,因為家庭經濟難以負擔國際學校學費。
如果target IS, 咁我都會轉Anfield讀K1

Rank: 2


50
發表於 19-11-22 12:15 |顯示全部帖子
我兩個女都係由Think N班開始讀, 直至小學畢業。Think幼稚園是無可置疑值得推介。至於小學方面,學生人數少,校舍不太理想,這就要考慮一下。不過,我肯定,這並不代表Think小學教育程度不及其他學校

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1430
發表於 19-11-22 17:43 |顯示全部帖子
cheercheer 發表於 19-11-22 12:15
我兩個女都係由Think N班開始讀, 直至小學畢業。Think幼稚園是無可置疑值得推介。至於小學方面,學生人數少 ...

cheercheer, 可以分享一下think的教學嗎? 謝謝
你需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊