2nd in 結果

retriever

回覆 markey 的帖子

有無公佈幾多可入3RD IN?

retriever

回覆 christywwk 的帖子

for those who got reject letter, did they go to 2nd in?

the school may take the chance to send reject letter to those who failed in 1st in.



btw, do anyone know how many envelop u provide when u first submitted the application?

retriever

回覆 markey 的帖子

係咩? 交表唔駛交信封?
咁失落1ST IN 既最終唔會收到信?


姐係而家收REJECT 是堅2ND IN REJECTED?




BTW, 簡介會記唔記得有無講3RD IN 幾多人? 或者BY HISTORY?

retriever

回覆 jyylamcheung 的帖子

3RD IN JAN? 唔係DEC?

JAN 出結果啦...


嘩, 佢提早同TSL 特別同大抽獎鬥搶人!!!!

retriever

aka722 發表於 15-11-24 14:21
should be not, my son is Jan B

maybe 分數排

1st and 2nd in arrangement is based on the app no.
for 3rd in.... well, if an IT staff was tasked to generate the list of interviews, only if he/she was asked to make it random, the list has to be based on something for sorting, rite?

and for the final interview, it make sense to arrange the interviews per preferences as that will make the principal 's life easier to compare and pick the one she likes.

if not, how could she come back from a pick at interview no.298 and compare it by feel with that at interview no.2??!

retriever

回覆 Snoopyboy 的帖子

"校長都是人，不可能一次過in 哂三百多個家長，實有人in 早in 遲啦"

technically speaking, cuz principal lam is a human being not a machine, there should be some kind of sorting that let the principal to make a sensible decision among 300 candidates.

retriever

aka722 發表於 15-11-26 11:36
Um...true....so the sorting is probably based on some kind of preference so that the principal can c ...

well, it does make sense, doesn't it?

but it doesn't mean the earlier the higher chance, but certainly there is kind of grouping...


hey, when u go to a boutique and try to decide between two dresses... do u need to put it together and compare in front of the mirror?