傳統名校vs國際學校

4eyesDad

原帖由 Jane1983 於 15-06-27 發表
回覆 圓方 的帖子

順口問句，你覺得女拔和St Paul Coed讀得叻的學生，會出現你講的local top student 問題 ...

人的經歷不是科學實驗，唔可以做control experience，不過，以我認識的Co-ed 既top students, 去咗外國top u 個D，個個都把孩子首先送到國際學校，然後往外國讀中學及大學，似乎全無乜人有興趣把他們的孩子送回母校的小學及中學！(另外有D嫁唔去既，真係冇得講)

4eyesDad

原帖由 Jane1983 於 15-06-28 發表
回覆 4eyesDad 的帖子

認識幾個Spcc和女拔的舊生，都把小朋友送返母校，但吾係熟，吾知道小朋友讀成點。

舊生而且去了外國讀大學的，他們可能有不同看法。

4eyesDad

原帖由 picture 於 15-06-28 發表
如果入到SPCC or DGS, 我一定入。唔適合至去IS.  

以SPCC 同DG 的水平，轉IS 未聽過有人失手。

我認識有此校小學生考IS 有問題啊!

4eyesDad

原帖由 lken001 於 15-06-30 發表
haha. 如果LS咁好，佢地點會叫自己的下一代讀IS =)

冇錯，所以在這個"famous local schools versus international schools"議題上, 結論只有一個。可惜，亦是可憐，絕大部分的香港人，根本沒有經濟能力作出選擇！有機會及有能力作出選擇的朋友，你們多麼的幸福啊！

4eyesDad

Wallaby 發表於 15-6-27 00:37
Depends on which international school as well.

I suppose it is important to find out the true owners/controllers of fee-paying schools because of the potential benefits available to them, either in the form of administrative fees or licence fees or in whatever name or form. Not all HK parents are naive enough to believe that all international schools (including private schools) are charities and they know that even some charities, despite the so-called charitable status, are run for the benefits of the "owners"/"controllers"!

4eyesDad

原帖由 aidan08 於 15-07-29 發表
兒女長大，是否離開香港也不單純是父母的選擇。父母能做的，是指引，是盡能力去教育而已。路始終是子女的。 ...

Your uncle's children benefited from good education in the UK. What would have happened if they were born and raised in HK? Would they achieve (making the same kind of money, living at mid-levels, playing at HKCC, etc.) the same living standard were they educated in HK at local schools? Do you think your uncle regret his decision to raise his kids in the UK?