用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 備戰大學 IB Chinese A SL vs NSS Chinese
樓主: kids-kingdom
go

IB Chinese A SL vs NSS Chinese [複製鏈接]

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5331
21#
發表於 15-1-25 20:35 |只看該作者
kids-kingdom 發表於 15-1-25 08:37
Is it correct to say that Chinese Language and Literature (LL) is more suitable for students if their language skill is not that strong compared to Chinese Language (L) ?

Simply speaking, is LL easier that L or easier to achieve a better score ?






It is true that most students prefer doing LL. Since L involves more literature works and thus more genres. Not all genre would be considered enjoyable by all students. On the other hand, the language component of LL is usually more daily life matters, e.g. advertisements or even comic stripes. But it really depends on the personality. Some students love studying literature and feel that they are more confident to score high with L.




Rank: 5Rank: 5


3668
22#
發表於 15-1-26 10:19 |只看該作者
kids-kingdom 發表於 15-1-23 06:52
Given that the student in this school are local Chinese, I doubt whether they have the resources to  ...

I was told that SSC will start offering French AB OR Spanish AB next school year.  

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5822
23#
發表於 15-1-26 11:00 |只看該作者
Lamtau 發表於 15-1-26 10:19
I was told that SSC will start offering French AB OR Spanish AB next school year.
ab can only be group 6 (as alternatives to art subjects) but not group 2 language I guess

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


22066
24#
發表於 15-1-26 11:45 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:Lamtau+發表於+15-1-26+10:19+I+was+

原帖由 caa 於 15-01-26 發表
ab can only be group 6 (as alternatives to art subjects) but not group 2 language I guess
Yea, ab can be taken as second language



Rank: 6Rank: 6


5822
25#
發表於 15-1-26 13:10 |只看該作者
poonseelai 發表於 15-1-26 11:45
Yea, ab can be taken as second language
Yea ab can certainly be taken as group 2. I should have said better only consider ab for group 6 but not as group 2.

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10


25867
26#
發表於 15-1-28 22:22 |只看該作者
I guess, nowadays, universities won't take it for granted that simply you're chinese, you should have chinese as your mother tongue.

Rank: 4


592
27#
發表於 15-3-11 01:13 |只看該作者
My D has taken both IB Chinese A SL and DSE Chinese before. She commented that IB Chinese focuses more on literary analysis and she got to appreciate Chinese classics and foreign translated texts, as well as to understand more about Chinese history and culture. She did not like reading before taking IB Chinese but after that she absolutely loves Chinese literature. Thanks to the hard work of her teacher, she got a decent score for Chinese A Literature, and seems like Literature is more safe than L&L since it is quite new (more students in her school got higher grades than those in L&L).  For DSE Chinese, her classmates in university think the results are not guaranteed even if they attend tutorial classes outside. Personally, I think DSE Chinese focuses more on exam techniques instead of really learning the essence of Chinese. I would opt for IB Chinese if your school has a good teacher. Unfortunately, IB Chinese is always undervalued because local parents and students always think it is easy, but in fact, it is quite hard to get a good grade.

Rank: 4


592
28#
發表於 15-3-11 01:16 |只看該作者
Also, HKDSE Chinese, especially writing have very arbitrary grades. My D's friend studied in an elite local school and ended up getting a 3 in DSE writing. And for university admission, HK and overseas universities consider both systems. Not sure about the required standard, but for normal subjects, IB Chinese A level 5 or above is considered good enough to get into good units.

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


118438
29#
發表於 15-3-11 08:12 |只看該作者

回覆:ksenia 的帖子

香港一般家長,老師及傳媒貶低 lB 中文程度是十分正路及可以理解,唔通會承認香港的 NSS 課程及 DSE 中文評核是垃圾,連鬼子佬的中文比我們一向驕傲 (成日用 HKAL 比其他考試) 的考試強,情何以堪!


事實上,NSS中文課程及DSE考核方法是否能夠幫助學生瞭解,欣賞及愛上中國語文,文學及文化,如果不是,只是標榜中文科吊詭,「深」,玩嘢,家長自己想想,這種教育方式是否學生為本,抑或長官意志。



點評

ksenia  Can't agree more.  發表於 15-3-11 19:12
poonseelai    發表於 15-3-11 12:57
God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 4


592
30#
發表於 15-3-11 19:21 |只看該作者
from my D's friend:

經常有人聽到我讀IB中文,就笑住咁問我,IB中文係咪好易?鬼佬出嘅題目,會難得去邊?


我敢話,以IB中文A1 SL黎講(甚至A2),我好肯定正常嘅香港DSE中六學生,隨時連題目都理解唔到。IB考嘅係文學知識、欣賞及理解作品深層意義嘅能力,並唔係好似香港咁考5種應用能力。雖然講真,到最後入試場都係考背、考吹,但係起碼我背嘅係文學知識,吹嘅係文學理論,上堂嘅時候有努力學習過點樣去欣賞理解作品,亦有自己讀無數嘅評論、導賞,豐富肚子裏嘅墨水。


雖然有時,我都會覺得所謂嘅“文學賞析”係一件好無聊、主觀、虛無縹緲嘅事,甚至有d荒謬,但係相比起香港學制個種聽說讀寫+綜合能力嘅學習,邊個先係”贏家“呢(關於有人不滿我之前用“皇者”一詞,識我嘅人應該知道,個個係irony,我心目中嘅“皇者”係DSE,DSE簡直贏晒,我都唔想講到咁白。不過為免爭坳都係用第二個詞語)?香港教你嘅係好practical嘅野,(希望)比你可以係工作上應用翻。但係,學習唔係剩係為左係社會生存,而係為左學習生活、豐富知識、學習思維。呢個都係我選擇讀IB、去英國讀書嘅一大原因。


因為我爸爸成日同我講,教育並唔係剩係為左成績,而係為左學會做一個人。


我好感謝有個咁有經驗嘅啟明燈為我引路。


兩年嘅IB,認真,到最終都係考背,但係我學識左欣賞文學(雖然造詣並不深),學識左曠闊眼光、了解世界時事,學識左獨立研究、寫proposal、做experiment、批判思考,學識左聰明地research、吸收資料再混為一體地應用翻出黎,點樣寫一篇好論文,點樣好好分配時間。而李寶椿更加比我識到一班黎自世界各地、不同文化嘅同學(等我係歐洲有得周圍去旅行),同埋boost my confidence,令我由一個驚驚青青、收收埋埋、乳臭未乾嘅細路,係兩年間成熟左、改變左唔少。多謝大家咁體諒我,比咁多機會我發展,and trusted me with a lot of stuff。


哇,由IB中文講到DSE再講到李寶椿再拉到自己,睇黎IB教育真係對我嘅structure同story-telling能力幫助不少(當然都要多謝突破DJ班)。希望小朋友們好好考慮一下讀IB,原因唔係剩係因為外國承認,又或者讀嘅science/maths比DSE易,而係為左challenge自己,個重點係學識獨立思考、真正學習,令到自己強d,學習做一個人。


And once you've conquered the IB, you know you that can conquer anything (well, hopefully).

______________________________________________________________________________________________

補充:聽完朋友嘅觀點,我都好同意我係好幸運嘅一群。好坦白,讀緊中五嘅我仍然係懵剩剩,IB同李寶椿係我爸爸同我提起,我先知道有d咁嘅野。我好幸運有好緊張我、對教育好有要求嘅家人,而且家境可以支持到我去李寶椿同英國。現實中,可以選擇嘅只係一小撮人。仲記得之前係facebook,有朋友話過“香港嘅教育,係比有錢人玩嘅遊戲。你有錢,就可以讀名校、讀外國學制、入好大學。”當然,你嘅命運係自己掌握,能否飛黃騰達都要睇個人付出同際遇,但家境有錢就有本錢,起跑線上有advantage,呢個係好可悲嘅現實。

以上都講過,我選擇讀IB、去英國讀書嘅“一大原因”係因為覺得外地教學模式應該比較全面,可以訓練思維,學會做人。只係”一大原因“,我並無排除其他原因。都係個句,好坦白,IB係國際課程,聲譽良好,大學比較鍾意,考大學有優勢,有邊個敢話,選擇讀IB個陣完全無考慮過呢一點?去英國讀書,可以體驗外地生活,如果係讀Oxbridge更加有個好響嘅朵。選科方面,我成日都好羨慕個d讀緊自己鍾意嘅科嘅人,我自己就因為家庭嘅問題,選擇左自己並無特別興趣(但並不反感)嘅“實用科”。聽落去好似同我一路講緊嘅野contradict咁,其實唔係。雖然我唔係係香港讀大學,唔係好清楚真正嘅教學模式,但聽講偏向“實用”,例如不論你讀乜科,都係教你死背syllabus同逼你學應用中文。係外地,即使你讀嘅係”實用科“(如econ,engine,law),tutor會想你事前自己讀不同學者嘅評論、篇章,然後係tutorial度討論不同角度同發表自己嘅意見,無話邊個啱邊個錯,希望你可以學習思考。

以上只係我個人感想,無話過我講嘅野全部都係“正確”,亦都從來無講過自己讀完IB高人一等,希望唔好扭曲我嘅觀點,更加唔希望人身攻擊,但歡迎討論。

注:個人感想到此為止,因為讀到以下呢個post先有感而發寫左呢篇note,下面文字並不全部代表我的意見。

______________________________________________________________________________________________

轉載:“當連外國的中文科試題都比香港的還要好,可見香港的教育多失敗。以下是IB中文科試題,要求學生從自己之前所學的文章分析:‘“對文學而言,那些沒有把著眼點放在對人的關注上的作品,應該是毫無價值的,而好的作品則完全是從人的靈魂入手。”以所學作品為基礎,談談你對上述論點的看法。


“詩人不但要走向內心世界的深處,同時也要探求外部世界的真實,從而使個人體驗與社會生活在作品中得到融合。”所選詩人中如何在其作品中將上述兩者融合並加以表現?’


這些題目出得很難,但真的很好。我相信香港95﹪學生都不會答到。香港的中英文科淪為能力訓練,訓練所謂的聆聽能力,歸納能力。口試成了虛偽的互相擦鞋。而所謂的獨立思考能力又要移居到通識科加以訓練。充斥偽科學式的能力分類。當局完全沒意識到獨立思考能力從來就是與語言能力掛勾,與學識掛鉤,與肚子裡的墨水掛鉤。而語言能力強的人必然懂文學。


這是香港教育的悲哀,學科能力化,實用化。”

點評

ANChan59  Good article for non-IB parent   發表於 15-3-15 15:59
foolish.mom  Thx for sharing  發表於 15-3-11 19:52
foolish.mom  very good passage  發表於 15-3-11 19:51

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11053
31#
發表於 15-3-12 00:31 |只看該作者
閣下女兒友人的文章是很好的明證:
1. lpc 是一所很出色的學校, 培育很多廣闊視野, 正面的年青人. 文章思路清晰, 言之有物,
2. 一個留英讀大學的年青人, 她的中文水平應該是在她的中學年代所訓練出來的吧, 那麼ib chinese hl 絕不是坊間所言的"好容易"
祝願年青人前程錦繡!

Rank: 4


592
32#
發表於 15-3-12 15:07 |只看該作者
武航 發表於 15-3-12 00:31
閣下女兒友人的文章是很好的明證:
1. lpc 是一所很出色的學校, 培育很多廣闊視野, 正面的年青人. 文章思路 ...
Thank you. Will pass you compliments to D's friend
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖