用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 國際學校 ISF foundation year 180個位,難入嗎?
樓主: fatcni
go

ISF foundation year 180個位,難入嗎? [複製鏈接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


300
41#
發表於 14-9-24 22:02 |只看該作者

引用:回覆+sh00+的帖子 I+did+not+expect+my+fr

原帖由 sh00 於 14-09-24 發表
回覆 sh00 的帖子

I did not expect my friend could respond to my email so quickly. He is usually qui ...
洗咩咁認真。大家都係討論下。信唔信呢家野自行決定啦。



點評

sh00  all righty, thanks!  發表於 14-9-24 22:50

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


48932
42#
發表於 14-9-24 22:04 |只看該作者
今日聽人講,范姜個女由Isf轉咗去Esf(好似係Bradbury)。有d愕然,好似較少咁轉。

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


21689
43#
發表於 14-9-24 22:08 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 HKTHK 於 14-9-24 22:08 編輯

回覆 tingtingting 的帖子

Calm down, no need to get all worked up.  I don't even think sh00 is a hater.  I just think it is irresponsible to comment on something one knows absolutely nothing about and then pulls a rabbit out of of thin air.  Worst of all, the supposed "information" isn't even credible.

I couldn't care less how many people apply to the school.  More applicants doesn't make a school better or worse.  But I do find spreading misinformation irresponsible.

今日佳句: 我以往也以為國際板的家長也有質素,但現在才知deal with 一些麻煩家長也不易!  

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1911
44#
發表於 14-9-24 22:15 |只看該作者

引用:今日聽人講,范姜個女由Isf轉咗去Esf(好似

原帖由 Jane1983 於 14-09-24 發表
今日聽人講,范姜個女由Isf轉咗去Esf(好似係Bradbury)。有d愕然,好似較少咁轉。 ...
It's indeed fairly common. A colleague of mine is planning to switch her kid to HKIS. To her, her kid's Chinese is already good enough. There are also many who see ISF as a perfect pre-boarding school springboard - at least their kids know some Chinese.



點評

Jane1983  Thanks   發表於 14-9-24 22:16

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1911
45#
發表於 14-9-24 22:17 |只看該作者

引用:+本帖最後由+HKTHK+於+14-9-24+22:08+編輯+

原帖由 HKTHK 於 14-09-24 發表
本帖最後由 HKTHK 於 14-9-24 22:08 編輯

回覆 tingtingting 的帖子
I apologise if I sound too offensive or defensive. Just wanted to state my view, which is of course purely personal.



Rank: 4


611
46#
發表於 14-9-24 22:54 |只看該作者
tingtingting 發表於 14-9-24 22:17
I apologise if I sound too offensive or defensive. Just wanted to state my view, which is of course  ...
Why apologise? This is such a beautifully written piece! I am actually as much impressed by your school as by your writing. Thanks for taking the time to share it with us!

Rank: 4


611
47#
發表於 14-9-24 22:56 |只看該作者
annie40 發表於 14-9-24 20:41
hehe.. you are humorous. Like
Just wanna say "hi." I always think you are a wise and kind lady :)

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1191
48#
發表於 14-9-25 13:26 |只看該作者
回覆 Jane1983 的帖子

Bradbury 即係最細個囡?Last year I met her youngest daughter interviewed cis.

點評

Jane1983  不是,讀小學那一個。  發表於 14-9-25 16:14
caa  no, not the youngest  發表於 14-9-25 14:41

Rank: 4


616
49#
發表於 14-9-25 19:30 |只看該作者
我孩子在小學,從來也沒有聽過學校公佈的考生人數。我只記得前年有朋友說 sibling 加 debenture holder 已是相當多,也認識 sibling 入不到。我想這些情況和其他國際學校相若。說難,我估應該比本地名校容易。
ISF 小學是中文和中文數學特別重,絕對不比本地學校差,因為要認真學中文,所以功課量也不少的。這點要留意。
如果家庭有中文語境,不用另補中文,讀完小學中文程度都算幾好。我想這是不少家庭選擇 ISF 的原因吧。

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5616
50#
發表於 14-9-25 21:04 |只看該作者
People would often believe in what we WANT to believe. Often the number of applicants per school gets blown out of proportion, as we all buy into the fear factor. This includes a huge application number, since:
a) If my child gets in, it means she beats thousands of people to get that spot
b) If my child do not get in, that is only because there are thousands of people fighting for the same spot.

Yesterday i was at the CIS parent's seminar (the one every family need to attend in order to apply). The principal clearly stated that there are 88 Reception spots (as we all know) each year, then she followed with "if history repeats itself, we know there will be as many applicants as last year, which is about 800". Cross my heart, this was what i heard yesterday. I thought in my heart, "That's it? 800 is not too bad". If one of the most sought after IS has an application that numbers only 800, then 600 applicants for ISF is believable. I am not siding with anyone. Just so happened i heard this statement yesterday, so I'm sharing with you the info i came across.

點評

chiyin8    發表於 14-9-26 00:05
sh00  this year? Sorry for the mess!  發表於 14-9-25 23:34
sh00  applicants. Is it the same thi   發表於 14-9-25 23:32
sh00  interviews to 2/3 of the appli   發表於 14-9-25 23:32
sh00  last year, CIS only gave inter   發表於 14-9-25 23:28

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


48932
51#
發表於 14-9-25 21:58 |只看該作者
回覆 jolalee 的帖子

謝謝分享!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


465
52#
發表於 14-9-25 22:45 |只看該作者

引用:People+would+often+believe+in+what+we+WA

原帖由 jolalee 於 14-09-25 發表
People would often believe in what we WANT to believe. Often the number of applicants per school get ...
CIS has 800 applicant only?!  I am a bit surprised. Maybe it is because you really need preliviged connections to get in or you have to be extremely smart. A lot of interested candidates do not even try given the prestigious profile of the school.



Rank: 5Rank: 5


1987
53#
發表於 14-9-25 23:02 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 21Ckid 於 14-9-25 23:19 編輯
jolalee 發表於 14-9-25 21:04
People would often believe in what we WANT to believe. Often the number of applicants per school get ...
ISF attracts a lot of LS applicants (because of its chinese content and emphasis on academics) and that's why the number of applicants far exceed that of CIS.

As simple as this.

Rank: 4


561
54#
發表於 14-9-25 23:32 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 type409 於 14-9-25 23:45 編輯

Let me put it this way:

CIS: 800 applicants fight for 88 spots
ISF: 1000+ applicants fight for 180 spots

Does it give a more clear picture?

From the analysis above, it is much easier to get admitted by ISF. BRAVO!
***

But the fact is, that 88 spots of CIS and 180 spots of ISF are not for the world at large. Don't forget about those have siblings priority, debenture holders and other VVIP doners!

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5616
55#
發表於 14-9-25 23:43 |只看該作者
回覆 sh00 的帖子

I don't know, but from the way the principal expressed it, nothing much changes from year to year in terms of application. At least not this year.

點評

sh00  I see. thanks  發表於 14-9-26 00:44

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


21689
56#
發表於 14-9-25 23:46 |只看該作者
回覆 jolalee 的帖子

Yes, I think people should believe in what they want to believe in and thank you for your ill-informed view!  
今日佳句: 我以往也以為國際板的家長也有質素,但現在才知deal with 一些麻煩家長也不易!  

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


21689
57#
發表於 14-9-26 00:00 |只看該作者
And for anyone who absolutely must get to the bottom of this, here is someone, not mine, with a more informed view:

http://www.itseducation.asia/sch ... ools%20Explorer.pdf

點評

jolalee  Thanks for sharing it.  發表於 14-9-26 16:15
jolalee  wrong, but good ref anyhow.  發表於 14-9-26 16:15
jolalee  Some info on the ITS site is w   發表於 14-9-26 16:14
今日佳句: 我以往也以為國際板的家長也有質素,但現在才知deal with 一些麻煩家長也不易!  

Rank: 2


71
58#
發表於 14-9-26 00:09 |只看該作者

回覆:tingtingting 的帖子

Bravo, simply way too many self-hating Asians floating around, like those who writes those articles titled "X國教育震撼了十三億人" on FB groups.



Rank: 2


71
59#
發表於 14-9-26 00:11 |只看該作者

引用:Bravo,+simply+way+too+many+self-hating+A

原帖由 Woojba 於 14-09-26 發表
Bravo, simply way too many self-hating Asians floating around, like those who writes those articles  ...
This is in response to tingtingting's two cents post



Rank: 6Rank: 6


9567
60#
發表於 14-9-26 00:18 |只看該作者
I'm amazed at how a simplistic 2 word question "如題" could lead to this kind of heated exchange, obviously there are some very convinced people around and if there is any deviation from their views it must be from haters or even self-hating haters

點評

jolalee  Agree with you Jane!   發表於 14-9-26 16:09
Jane1983  咁既反應幾恐怖,無謂搭嘴 :surp   發表於 14-9-26 07:27
‹ 上一主題|下一主題