用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 使用意見 請問版主:為何此處空窗處處?連Eviepa都被釘戶? ...
樓主: csy_ma
go

請問版主:為何此處空窗處處?連Eviepa都被釘戶? [複製鏈接]


3367
21#
發表於 11-10-20 02:47 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4440
22#
發表於 11-10-20 11:06 |只看該作者
原帖由 Tommy 於 11-10-19 22:21 發表

Ian,

如果能夠與judy和eviepa一起陣亡(Sorry, 韜了您們的光),我倒覺是我的榮耀,不過我知我沒這個資格。

Anyway, 多謝您沒有關閉我的帳戶,並作出了迅速的回應和詳細的交代。我將會慢慢釋懷。

始終覺得多運用預防教育,少進行事後懲罰,大家便可以相親相愛,一團和氣,喜氣洋洋。您應該明白我的意思的。

Tommy


原來禁言都要講"資格"架......
版主大人今次禁左甘多人.....講來講去都冇講"性"在bk尺度可以到咪程度......, motherotk的言論(我自認冇睇晒全部)我覺得只系分享而已, 完全睇唔到佢有意"鼓吹"性或強調要別人跟佢既做法,睇法, 何解甘都要禁言????........甘嚴謹請問是否連"porn"字都唔可以出現呢????

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11

醒目開學勳章


46443
23#
發表於 11-10-20 12:43 |只看該作者

回覆 22# samuel89 的文章

argh!!!!!   

Is this why this get into the nerves of everyone?

I am sorry but there are really limited functions we can use during forum administration, so the only way we can hide all the posts during review is to block the account first!  That's all!

I am thinking this morning, may be need to write a thread to explain how account block works......  but please, give us some time.

I assume everyone treats account blocking as pure penalization?

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5702
24#
發表於 11-10-20 13:34 |只看該作者
Will you punish your kids without any explanation?
Do you want to see the result that someone will not speech after his account has been banned once?
Someone may feel disappointed as he had some contribution here but finally getting a ...
Who is the loss?

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


23048
25#
發表於 11-10-20 13:54 |只看該作者
我也有同感! 本人脸皮薄, 自尊心重, 如有日不幸被禁言, 也会考虑从今一去不返的!

原帖由 kls12 於 11-10-20 13:34 發表
Will you punish your kids without any explanation?
Do you want to see the result that someone will not speech after his account has been banned once?
Someone may feel disappointed as he had some contr ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4440
26#
發表於 11-10-20 14:05 |只看該作者

回覆 23# iantsang 的文章

我在bk發言一直嚴守我自己的低線及價值觀,我唔會用"人身攻擊",謾罵,粗言穢語(但都同人互諷爭論過,用過粗卑d既潮語)....到現時都未被ban過or警告過, 所以我認為我應該都未過bk的低線及價值觀, 但像今次motherotk被ban,而我都同好多網友一樣唔認為佢有踩過界,所以先會有甘多人get into the nerves 呵.....

希望版主大人們儘快交代一下bk條低線及價值觀, 其實上bk發言, 任何人都唔可以"逃"得過公論, 果d無謂爭拗,錯誤價值觀好快就會俾人看穿晒, 版主大人們就算唔執法, 各人都會"自吃惡果".......

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6493
27#
發表於 11-10-20 14:10 |只看該作者
我看大家還是耐心等待版主們覆審之後的結果吧.


89
28#
發表於 11-10-20 14:25 |只看該作者
This is from father of two kids, family member of mother of two kids (motherotk). She asks me to write that there is nothing "shameful" about the "ban", and she will keep on open discussion to share opinions and exchange parenting perspectives from diverse angles with considerate and respectful attitudes.

Role modeling is important in parenting.

原帖由 annie40 於 11-10-20 13:54 發表
我也有同感! 本人脸皮薄, 自尊心重, 如有日不幸被禁言, 也会考虑从今一去不返的!

[ 本帖最後由 fotk 於 11-10-20 14:37 編輯 ]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


23048
29#
發表於 11-10-20 14:56 |只看該作者
Bravo!!

原帖由 fotk 於 11-10-20 14:25 發表
This is from father of two kids, family member of mother of two kids (motherotk). She asks me to write that there is nothing "shameful" about the "ban", and she will keep on open discussion to share o ...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1126
30#
發表於 11-10-20 15:06 |只看該作者
有冇member可以pm我知是什麼原因那幾位a/c被封?? 是什麼言論呢?? 老實說,有時我未必完全同意Eviepa & Judy 的觀點,但我很愛看他們在這裏的討論.既然是討論,各持不同的觀點,當然會有火花,亦因此論者逐陳其詞,各有理據.大家對所論者有更深刻的反思.(我在本版學了不少)若因論點不合乎社會倫理,我想版主要清楚解釋,以釋眾慮.若因激烈的爭辯,用詞稍為尖刻,就被冠以人身攻擊之名,似乎太過了!若魯迅上BK,他的a/c早就已被封.
另一方面,一封a/c就delete所有文章實在是bk的損失.舉例,以前活躍於國際學校那位,其實在BK都很有貢獻,他推動了不少英語閱讀的風氣,亦很樂意分享閱讀的方法,只是說話有時太過,觸怒了其他會員,就將他所有文章删除,包括很詳細的閱讀計劃及書籍推介,實在可惜.
我希望版主能有容人之量,使這裏回復以往百花齊放,百家爭鳴的局面.

[ 本帖最後由 bbJP 於 11-10-20 15:09 編輯 ]


12651
31#
發表於 11-10-20 16:12 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4355
32#
發表於 11-10-20 16:20 |只看該作者
原帖由 awah112 於 11-10-20 16:12 發表
Sumyeema1 開返.



thanks awah 記得我。

我只不過抒發下感受, 都搞到甘...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3973
33#
發表於 11-10-20 16:57 |只看該作者
你返來啦!!!
你知啦, 呢度我齋睇架嘛...嚇C 人啦.

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


23048
34#
發表於 11-10-20 17:00 |只看該作者
Sumyeema1,

幸好你的文能重见天日, 让大家认真的研究吓'搞到甘'的原因.  基本是睇完就更加'唔明'死因. 低B的是我认为合理结论是版主一时手快快的按错'delete' button.把你发配边疆!

在这里送'等着你回来' 这首歌歌词给motherotk,eviepa, stccmc, judy, and Y2K (循循善诱version):

我等着你回来
我想着你回来
等你等你回来让我开怀
等等你等你回来免我关怀
你为甚不回来
如果你还不还不回来
春光不再
你还不还不回来
热泪满腮
梁上燕子已回来
庭前春花为你开
你为甚为甚不回来
我要等你回来
还不回来春光不再
还不回来热泪满腮

原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 11-10-20 16:20 發表


thanks awah 記得我。

我只不過抒發下感受, 都搞到甘...

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6493
35#
發表於 11-10-20 21:20 |只看該作者
welcome back, sumyeema.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11

醒目開學勳章


46443
36#
發表於 11-10-20 22:22 |只看該作者
原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 11-10-20 16:20 發表


thanks awah 記得我。

我只不過抒發下感受, 都搞到甘...


Sumyeema,

Please allow my personal apology to you.  The minute I saw you post I was disappointed and I have tears in my eyes when I have to take the actions required.  

There are really a lot of things going on in behind.  So we are at a stage that we don't wanna stir up too much emotion while all the 超版 are tied up.  Any more argument as a result of these new discussions can just be unbearable.

I wish I could have the ability to think of a better way.  Unfortunately, members are assuming there are so many unrealistic functionality during our administration which are simply unavailable.

I hope you can understand.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3731
37#
發表於 11-10-20 22:58 |只看該作者
原帖由 iantsang 於 11-10-20 22:22 發表


Sumyeema,

Please allow my personal apology to you.  The minute I saw you post I was disappointed and I have tears in my eyes when I have to take the actions required.  

There are really a lo ...


Ian,

I totally understand there are so many limitations in BK's infrastructure and being a webmaster is really a tough job.  However, I think to ban the accounts, no matter  1 days, 2 days or 14 days, just because they make comment on the thread or jsut share their feelings, is not a good way to manage the members and the forum.  On the contrary, it stirs up people's emotion and even make the the situation even more messy.

Why don't you simply do a time-out to the thread and stick a "STOP" sign onto it?   

By doing this, no more discussion is allowed, all the threads is kept unchanged for further investigation, everything is transparent to all the members.  Isn't that nice?

Tommy

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


112851
38#
發表於 11-10-20 23:05 |只看該作者

回覆 37# Tommy 的文章

Time out is a good suggestion.
God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


10848
39#
發表於 11-10-20 23:14 |只看該作者
原帖由 Tommy 於 11-10-20 22:58 發表

However, I think to ban the accounts, no matter  1 days, 2 days or 14 days, just because they make comment on the thread or jsut share their feelings, is not a good way to manage the members and the forum.  On the contrary, it stirs up people's emotion and even make the the situation even more messy.

AGREE!

The freedom of speech is fundamental human rights. There is no REASON to ban one's account because of sharing of feelings as long as the contents do not violate the forum's regulations.

._.

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5702
40#
發表於 11-10-20 23:27 |只看該作者
原帖由 cow 於 11-10-20 23:14 發表

AGREE!

The freedom of speech is fundamental human rights. There is no REASON to ban one's account because of sharing of feelings as long as the contents do not violate the forum's regulations.

._. ...


Agree!
But what are the forum's regulations? Changed?
‹ 上一主題|下一主題