- 在線時間
- 5470 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-9-25
- 國民生產力
- 66
- 附加生產力
- 85796
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-10-23
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 29276
- 主題
- 286
- 精華
- 3
- 積分
- 115138
- UID
- 107125
|
回覆 171# eviepa 的文章
eviepa
You always have a wrong impression on me as a die-hard supporter of HKAL, I explained more than one time, but you never listen. Yes, my wife and I studied in UK, but we are pretty open-mined in education. My son's first summer program in Australia(G4), then USA (G6), UK (G9).... we enourage wider exposure and analyse different systems for our boy. I need to be humble and I am not good enough to comment on those systems. May be you know more than us.
In UK, for top notch universities well consider HKAL, but they feel uncomfortable about HKDSE (Oxbridge). Their admission officers strongly recommended us either go for feeder school in UK or IB in HK. That's why we consider IB even I am not sure my son eligible to have an interview or not (Oxbridge). But, I and he didn't want to sit for so many examinations on top of HKDSE, GCE AL, SAT, AP etc. for overseas education.
Your point number 1 is partial valid, British discriminate other races and nationalities, just enjoy French, Scotish and Irish jokes. But Cambridge well appreciates the HKAL results as our Cs ~ to GCE As. Our 3As much much better than GCE-AL 3As, better preference in admission.
Your pt no.2 is nothing to do with my case as I explained in first paragraph. Don't complicated with 334 and 523 arguement again.
ANChan59
[ 本帖最後由 ANChan59 於 11-1-15 00:13 編輯 ] |
|