想插班ESF - 國際學校

發表於 16-12-7 16:23

發表於 16-12-7 16:23

964000

伯爵府

Rank: 8 Rank: 8


	16436

142^#

發表於 16-12-7 10:58 |只看該作者

wadh0988 發表於 16-12-7 00:04
Not many Westerners live in Kowloon. But there are a lot more Chinese than there were 2 years ago in ...

For me, I chose IS due to the ethos and curriculum, and the mindset of the educators . I don't really mind about the ethnic mix, in fact, it's an interesting observation that the concern and discussion of ethnic mix is only observed among the local parents, in expat discussion, people seldom talked about this issue

bbchu2013

複式洋房

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	373

143^#

發表於 16-12-7 11:37 |只看該作者

applebot 發表於 16-12-6 18:40
本帖最後由 applebot 於 16-12-6 18:45 編輯

啱啱聽完 ESF info for Year 1 parents

請問係咪報左名今年考YEAR 1先會邀請你去聽講座?

applebot

別墅

Rank: 4


	715

144^#

發表於 16-12-7 11:40 |只看該作者

bbchu2013 發表於 16-12-7 11:37
請問係咪報左名今年考YEAR 1先會邀請你去聽講座?

係


	480

145^#

發表於 16-12-7 14:19 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 2


	76

146^#

發表於 16-12-7 16:09 |只看該作者

Kittybama 發表於 16-12-7 14:19
我的意思是即使最終考IBD，但之前之Curriculum是無需跟從PYP及MYP之curriculum而可以follow其他的Curriculum，例如IGCSE，而IGCSE+IBD比MYP+IBD是更好的學習制度。

Do you have any appropriate evidence or examples to support your comment?


	480

147^#

發表於 16-12-7 16:16 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 2


	76

148^#

發表於 16-12-7 16:22 |只看該作者

Kittybama 發表於 16-12-7 16:16
沒有客觀數據，純粹是個人分析及觀點。

haha.... In God we Trust, all others bring DATA.

點評

Kittybama Haha！我分析後所作出判斷是有其道理，並非胡亂瞎說發表於 16-12-7 16:27

Artie

男爵府

Rank: 6 Rank: 6


	5331

149^#

發表於 16-12-7 20:33 |只看該作者

No need to provide evidence.
Everyone can believe in what he thinks best for his kids.
I have seen so many parents switching their kids from IGCSE + IB schools to MYP + IB schools, and of course vice versa.
I like what someone has already said.
"Respect" is what we need.

點評

Kittybama Switching from one school to another may involve a lot of different factors and may not havengreat d 發表於 16-12-7 22:19

poonseelai

侯爵府

Rank: 9 Rank: 9 Rank: 9


	23293

150^#

發表於 16-12-7 21:03 |只看該作者

Kittybama 發表於 16-12-7 16:16
沒有客觀數據，純粹是個人分析及觀點。

IBO 自己有分折 GCSE + DP 和 MYP+DP, 兩個課程接上DP各有優勢和不足，有興趣上IBO 網頁看一下

wadh0988

Rank: 2


	100

151^#

發表於 16-12-7 21:06 |只看該作者

回覆：964000 的帖子

I don't mean ethnic mix is a deciding factor (to me) but just my observation. I'm not saying it's a particular issue. Just a statement from what I can see.
And it will likely be more so as the old cat system is a story of the past and your mother tongue and passport does not not really matter.


	480

152^#

發表於 16-12-7 21:54 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽


	480

153^#

發表於 16-12-7 22:16 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

20000508

別墅

Rank: 4


	957

154^#

發表於 16-12-7 22:45 |只看該作者

回覆 delldell888 的帖子

Hi, personally I think IGCSE-> IBD is better than MYP->IBD. My eldest daughter who will be doing her IGCSE exams this year studied MYP before in another international school, she was able to think critically and in a rather creative way but her foundation was not as solid. But when she switched to another international school that does IGCSE instead of MYP, the school focuses more on the foundation, so now she has the ability to write well with a pretty solid foundation.

Rank: 2


	76

155^#

發表於 16-12-7 23:06 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 delldell888 於 16-12-7 23:34 編輯

Artie 發表於 16-12-7 20:33
No need to provide evidence.
Everyone can believe in what he thinks best for his kids.
I have seen s ...

She shouldn't have said IGCSE+IBD比MYP+IBD是更好的學習制度 without giving any data or evidence. It's a critical statement and totally unfair to students who take MYP.

858

複式洋房

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	464

156^#

發表於 16-12-8 01:01 |只看該作者

回覆 Kittybama 的帖子

平心而論，你無俾過乜野觀點，反而直接落定論。其他人問極你原因又唔答唔出，只係話自己啱自己客觀自己認為咁就咁，唔識舉一反三，絶非有意義的討論，唔怪得令人反感。其實大家都願意接收資訊以外的事，只係閣下表達方式十分有問題。

applebot

別墅

Rank: 4


	715

157^#

發表於 16-12-8 07:09 |只看該作者

20000508 發表於 16-12-7 22:45
回覆 delldell888 的帖子

Hi, personally I think IGCSE-> IBD is better than MYP->IBD. My eldest daugh ...

又來一場教育制度恐慌? 今次係IGCSE vs MYP?
選國際學校，大家都上網Research下先，乜嘢係IB, IGCSE, MYP PYP再唸清楚自己要乜嘢, 仲有你問清楚學校幾時完全轉晒行MYP...唔好攪到小朋友轉來轉去。
好似當年香港DSE 大恐慌。

poonseelai

侯爵府

Rank: 9 Rank: 9 Rank: 9


	23293

158^#

發表於 16-12-8 07:25 |只看該作者

applebot 發表於 16-12-8 07:09
又來一場教育制度恐慌? 今次係IGCSE vs MYP?
選國際學校，大家都上網Research下先，乜嘢係IB, IGCSE, MYP ...

本帖最後由 poonseelai 於 16-12-8 08:02 編輯

我想未到恐慌掛。我睇嗰份IBO分折，IBO自己都說sample size細，日後会再做大D，它提及MYP不足之處是knowledge比重不及GCSE,和學生無公開試經歷到考DP時考試技巧不足，這兩點我同意，孩子是用家而我多年來觀察亦有相同意見，由孩子上MYP已聽好多家長講MYP上DP有好大個gap, 因此特別留意是什麼原因，所以我覺得IBO对MYP分析都中肯，仲有無其他IBO收埋無講就唔識睇啦

Artie

男爵府

Rank: 6 Rank: 6


	5331

159^#

發表於 16-12-8 16:27 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 Artie 於 16-12-8 16:31 編輯

Kittybama 發表於 16-12-7 21:54
我個人對不同學際組合作分析並得出一些個人觀點，而各人有各人不同的觀點，我並沒有強迫任何人認同我的觀點 ...

My message was not written for you specifically.

點評

發表於 16-12-8 18:22

Artie

男爵府

Rank: 6 Rank: 6


	5331

160^#

發表於 16-12-8 16:42 |只看該作者

20000508 發表於 16-12-7 22:45
回覆 delldell888 的帖子

Hi, personally I think IGCSE-> IBD is better than MYP->IBD. My eldest daugh ...

Great. I am happy for you as you have found the right school for your child.
That was what I meant. Different curriculum would be suitable for different people.
My children are different. They had no problem with their writing skills.
For my children, MYP at their school has provided very strong foundation in all aspects.
But I am sure there must have been other children that would fit better with other curriculum.
So there is no "best" or "better" curriculum in general.
There is only a "suitable" one for a certain child.
By the way, I know a family that have one child in a through train IB (MYP + DP) school and another in an IGCSE + DP school. This arrangement is actually not that uncommon.
After all, different people have different needs.