真係忍唔住....其實啲家長知唔知自己係到做緊啲咩架?!

MLKC

If the government has such thought, then if I am a civil servant, should my son / daughter has priority to be a civil servant and work together in the same department and he/she can look after me ??

Also if the parents can easily look after their kids in the same school, it is unfair to have such special care taking for such kids. Will the staff know the exam questions in advance if they can handle the printing ???

原帖由 Ryan_baba 於 11-12-4 14:04 發表
根據政府官員嘅荒謬解釋，係方便在該校工作嘅父母可以照顧到自己嘅子女。難道在其他機構工作父母嘅小朋友係唔需要父母嘅照顧？

kitmantsoi

校工或老師可以照顧同校就讀子女可理解為荒謬？莫非自己得不到既方便其他人亦不能得到才算合理？我相信子女除學習知識， 學習體諒他人的同理心亦係必要的。共勉之.

ronniedad

原帖由 Ryan_baba 於 11-12-4 22:04 發表
根據政府官員嘅荒謬解釋，係方便在該校工作嘅父母可以照顧到自己嘅子女。難道在其他機構工作父母嘅小朋友係唔需要父母嘅照顧？

除應話有對校有貢獻或此算係為教育者的福利外, 呢個解釋又確係幾有問題. 如成立而家長又許可的話, 家長們又可以一同回校或於校外等待去照顧嗎? 只是覺得呢個解釋確係有D問題.

[ 本帖最後由 ronniedad 於 11-12-4 22:25 編輯 ]

Ryan_baba

呢個解釋係今年小一第一階段放榜當日，一位政府官員係電視新聞接受訪問時講的。

MLKC

Hope Mr. Tong or Mr. Leung will review this policy when he gets the Chief Executive's chair !!!!!!

原帖由 Ryan_baba 於 11-12-4 14:23 發表
呢個解釋係今年小一第一階段放榜當日，一位政府官員係電視新聞接受訪問時講的。

ronniedad

原帖由 MLKC 於 11-12-4 22:25 發表
Hope Mr. Tong or Mr. Leung will review this policy when he gets the Chief Executive's chair !!!!!!

唐生會? 咁佢在位時點解唔去攪? 我真係唔敢存太大寄望.........唉!

MLKC

I want to point out :
One of the major major major reasons of many parents doing so many application procedure is due to the ridiculous primary school point counting scheme set by the government.
If the game is fair, the parents can be more confident to choose primary schools and not so crazy to fight for the dragon schools or the long-history "good name" KGs to fight for the private primary schools.
The problem of the primary admission game is the root of the parents' worry.

HelloKittyBuzz

Liked x 10000000000000

To_Ma

原帖由 lnp 於 11-12-4 20:07 發表
身教
教唔公平

怎樣不公平？

HelloKittyBuzz

小朋友長大出嚟做事都要阿媽阿爸照顧？ 好似同照顧小朋友返學唔係好同，唔怪得有報紙話有仔女要帶埋阿爸阿媽去見工

MLKC

I said the son/daughter look after the parent in the office. Just a return.

MLKC

Can I write to request them to review the policy ?!?!

HelloKittyBuzz

Oh! Sorry, I have never heard that someone get into a company because of taking care of his or her father or mother who is not retired

HelloKittyBuzz

Maybe u can read and discuss in this thread

http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/vie ... &extra=page%3D2

Some info may inspire u

ronniedad

原帖由 MLKC 於 11-12-4 23:07 發表
Can I write to request them to review the policy ?!?!

有時我都會好懷疑D咩請願信佢地真係會開黎睇? 或真實情況碓是如此, 他們真的會認真地相討處理方法?(係真係盡辦法去完善, 唔係一味拖噃)

gskw

我都like! 睇到某啲家長將歪理變真理，真係好讚同Sheungki0101 講嘅＂令小朋友成績一流，品德九流，成為社會新一代嘅怪物！＂
每一個game 都有rule, 一定有人受惠啲，而依啲亦唔係我哋可以改變嘅嘢！
平常心，大家互相幫忙，遷就，忍讓啦！

Sheungki0101

Sorry,不慎將＂小學一覽＂個世襲計分討論拉左落嚟，本人小、中學畢業於東華三院，所以讀緊PN囡囡無任何得益於世襲計分制（入讀大部份家長所講名校）。
但係每個制度都有幾面睇，相信政府小學教育政策係以照顧小朋友為大前提，大家對呢個政策有偏見，係因為好多人將範圍著眼在所謂名校身上，計分制涵蓋每間名校同非名校，所有學校嘅舊生教職員都會覆蓋到，只不過非名校啲有分人仕唔申請啫，而舊生同教職員除左貢獻同方便照顧，起碼重熟悉學校嘅教學理念而方便配合學校教學，我覺得啲走後門拉關係而能入學先可能先算係唔公平；其實我係支持香港本地孕婦優先使用政府或私營醫院，係因為作為本地納稅人，優先使用本地資源係應該嘅，亦可以apply返點解本人覺得舊生同教職員子女計分方法冇問題，當然每個人對每一種制度都有唔同嘅睇法，政府亦應該時常檢討每一樣教育制度有冇改善嘅需要，盡量去滿足唔同市民各方面唔同需要啦！

HelloKittyBuzz

Liked again x10000000000000