關於集團
集團品牌
presslogic-logo
廣告查詢
工作機會
用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小學雜談 Giving up DBSPD for LS
樓主: sababy
go

Giving up DBSPD for LS [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2052
101#
發表於 07-1-8 11:35 |只看該作者

Re: Giving up DBSPD for LS

如果學費唔係問題,一定係揀DBSPD。一條龍升中學,唔駛為左個幾分放棄星期六日family day溫書,唔駛為升中排全級第幾煩餐死,都唔知死幾多細胞。
小朋友每天唔駛做好多功課(2-3樣),多左時間可以參加課外活動(sports, music, art 唔係補習),亦可以有時間看電視(時事節目和新聞)和看書。
而家要講通識,識將課本倒背如流又點,培養小朋友好奇心和求知慾先係最重要,我覺得DBSPD俾到平台小朋友發揮。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2561
102#
發表於 07-1-8 14:16 |只看該作者

Re: Giving up DBSPD for LS

原本我很同情那位surewinla要waiting list的遭遇,但是他那種撩事鬥非的行為實在令人討厭 唔好將自己的諗法套用


24
103#
發表於 07-1-8 17:35 |只看該作者

Re: Giving up DBSPD for LS

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11205
104#
發表於 07-1-8 23:41 |只看該作者

Re: Giving up DBSPD for LS

我唔知你係唔明定你刻意抹殺喇沙。我話兩間都有中學,跟其他沒有中學的小學比較,已較可取,若你鍾意喇沙就揀喇沙,你鍾意男拔就去揀男拔。是乎你喜好。不過我覺得如果從使費方面想,當然一間直資學校會比較貴。我比唔起便唯有揀喇沙囉。做一個堂堂正正喇沙人有何不妥。你話佢foolish system,最緊要自己唔覺就得喇。每一種方法都有好的方面也有壞的一面。
:verycold: :verycold: :verycold:


803
105#
發表於 07-1-9 10:01 |只看該作者

Re: Giving up DBSPD for LS

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 3Rank: 3


273
106#
發表於 07-1-9 13:27 |只看該作者

Re: Giving up DBSPD for LS

The English standard of DBSPD is equal to IS ??
I read their essays, the English standard is very very high. The students can learn it from school or outside ?

DBSPD published a book collected all essays at each levels, all my friends feel the standard is very high ?
Any comment about the essays ?  

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


11205
107#
發表於 07-1-9 16:06 |只看該作者

Re: Giving up DBSPD for LS

喇沙只要出於foolish system 而不染咪得囉。學生有好有壞,間間都有,只要自己做好本份,如果你去到男拔,但你自己foolish,咪一樣冇得玩。所以考慮自己既能力先總好過理埋個d EMB。你under 呢個system,你咪遵守呢個system既遊戲規則。照你咁講咪要間間都要轉直資或私立先得。況且喇沙收我,我每個月慳回四五千元,一年就四五萬,六年就成三十萬,都未計額外補習,校車,興趣班等等,如果計埋男拔中學那筆,跟本就非一般人可以負擔。我冇理由唔去讀喇沙啦。除非我有能力負擔又或者喇沙唔收我啦。
christf 寫道:
Of course '兩間都有中學,跟其他沒有中學的小學比較,已較可取". However,  I think we are talking about LS vs DBSPD in this thread and therefore I just stated some facts on the difference of these two schools although both of them have their secondary sections as well as some of my personal views.

Besides, I am just comparing the school systems as well as the mode of education which are affected by their sources of funding.

Regarding the "foolish system" I mentioned, I am not pinpointing the system operated by LS. I am talking about the current "升中一派位機制" as well as "the language of instruction policy" developed and manupulated by EMB which leads to so many problems in those government or subsidized schools.

I really think that the current system developed by EMB is "foolish".  You may have different views and I am just expressing my personal views here and has no intention to force anyone to agree with me.





[quote]
ohnono 寫道:
我唔知你係唔明定你刻意抹殺喇沙。我話兩間都有中學,跟其他沒有中學的小學比較,已較可取,若你鍾意喇沙就揀喇沙,你鍾意男拔就去揀男拔。是乎你喜好。不過我覺得如果從使費方面想,當然一間直資學校會比較貴。我比唔起便唯有揀喇沙囉。做一個堂堂正正喇沙人有何不妥。你話佢foolish system,最緊要自己唔覺就得喇。每一種方法都有好的方面也有壞的一面。
[/quote]
:verycold: :verycold: :verycold:

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

王國長老


5044
108#
發表於 07-1-9 16:39 |只看該作者

Re: Giving up DBSPD for LS

ohnono,

我諗你誤會左christf 既意思,佢唔係話同學Foolish,
而係政府既教學語言政策+現行派位制+接龍問題。
今日報紙先講英華都轉直資了,
唔係話學校唔想「出於foolish system 而不染」,
而係呢個制度唔到D 直屬英中唔諗轉呔,
一係脫鈎,咁大家唔使爭入名津小,
好似DPS ,一脫鈎唔接DBS 家長便覺無晒價值咁,
聖馬可接左龍又脫,家長一樣嘈到拆天!
一係轉直資,學校話事唔受制於政府,
亦唔使理達唔達標,鐘意用英文咪英文囉。
遵守呢個system既遊戲規則唔係唔得,
如果有一日D 名校因結龍而唔達標,
因而轉為中文中學,到時D 家長咪又怨聲載道….


803
109#
發表於 07-1-9 16:40 |只看該作者

Re: Giving up DBSPD for LS

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖