- 在線時間
- 882 小時
- 最後登錄
- 14-6-2
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 6332
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-11-24
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 4873
- 主題
- 4
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 11205
- UID
- 113384
  
|
Re: Giving up DBSPD for LS
喇沙只要出於foolish system 而不染咪得囉。學生有好有壞,間間都有,只要自己做好本份,如果你去到男拔,但你自己foolish,咪一樣冇得玩。所以考慮自己既能力先總好過理埋個d EMB。你under 呢個system,你咪遵守呢個system既遊戲規則。照你咁講咪要間間都要轉直資或私立先得。況且喇沙收我,我每個月慳回四五千元,一年就四五萬,六年就成三十萬,都未計額外補習,校車,興趣班等等,如果計埋男拔中學那筆,跟本就非一般人可以負擔。我冇理由唔去讀喇沙啦。除非我有能力負擔又或者喇沙唔收我啦。
christf 寫道:
Of course '兩間都有中學,跟其他沒有中學的小學比較,已較可取". However, I think we are talking about LS vs DBSPD in this thread and therefore I just stated some facts on the difference of these two schools although both of them have their secondary sections as well as some of my personal views.
Besides, I am just comparing the school systems as well as the mode of education which are affected by their sources of funding.
Regarding the "foolish system" I mentioned, I am not pinpointing the system operated by LS. I am talking about the current "升中一派位機制" as well as "the language of instruction policy" developed and manupulated by EMB which leads to so many problems in those government or subsidized schools.
I really think that the current system developed by EMB is "foolish". You may have different views and I am just expressing my personal views here and has no intention to force anyone to agree with me.
[quote]
ohnono 寫道:
我唔知你係唔明定你刻意抹殺喇沙。我話兩間都有中學,跟其他沒有中學的小學比較,已較可取,若你鍾意喇沙就揀喇沙,你鍾意男拔就去揀男拔。是乎你喜好。不過我覺得如果從使費方面想,當然一間直資學校會比較貴。我比唔起便唯有揀喇沙囉。做一個堂堂正正喇沙人有何不妥。你話佢foolish system,最緊要自己唔覺就得喇。每一種方法都有好的方面也有壞的一面。 [/quote] |
|