- 在線時間
- 0 小時
- 最後登錄
- 06-1-14
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 0
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 05-11-28
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 3
- 主題
- 0
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 3
- UID
- 65784

|
Re: 面試終於告一段落, 各位總共報左幾多間kinder?....
[size=medium]My son interview's result
KV: AM session accepted
SC: AM session accepted (will give up)
PLK Tam Au Yeung Siu Fong: AM session accepted (gave up already)
PC: Waiting for result.
KV VS SC
When comparing KV and SC, I picked KV for some general reasons such as:
Although SC is good in English and has higher chance (hearsay) to enter famous Primary school; the chinese and math's standard are not as good as KV;
KV could provide good foundation for student who will enter traditional primary/secondary school (I will likely send my to the traditional school rather than those so-called creative school or international school);
KV VS PC
But I really have some difficulties when making a decision between PC and KV (if PC accepted my son).
Pro PC
PC: Guarantee Band one Primary school;
KV: No guarantee;
PC: When K3, may try other band one school such as DBS, SPCC etc;
PC: around HK$1000 cheaper;
Pro KV
KV: Good in Chinese and Math, foundation in English is also good;
PC: (hearsay) the standard is tended to be low/simple in the kindergarden, so that the student there are normally failed in applying other band one primary school when k3; but suddenly turn to very difficult in P1 and some of the kids may not easily picked up;
KV: A DBS boy (currently studying in P2) shared that his classmate from KV are much stronger than those from SC in every test/dictation/exam etc; that means the education standard from KV is really not bad;
PC: Although it is a well known band one school with a lot of band one output; it is really a risk (at least for me) that to put my son in a Chinese teaching school; Just for example: if my son like to pick medical in the university, will he be facing a big problem if he studied biology in Chinese in his S4 and S5, or may be even S6 and S7??
If you have same feeling or similar difficulties, please share.
|
|